Monday, September 2, 2024

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Exposing David Keanu Sai through FACTS

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  Exposing David Keanu Sai through FACTS


                                                          a Repost 
                         Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)


As a Member of our Royal Family, Representative of our Royal Family,  House of Nobles member, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, etc., hereby note for the Legal records that this person named David Kedanu Sai has made some claims that are not truthful.

Sai acts as a self-appointed officer of the Kingdom of Hawaii and he is not recognized by our Royal Family..

Sai claims to Pearl Harbor is questioned because our Kamehameha Royal Family exists and we do not recognize him to be part of our Royal Family.

Our Family are the next-of-kin to Bernice Pauahi Bishop and own the Allodial Titles to Pearl Harbor, Halawa, etc.

Sai's genealogies are being reviewed. 

The following article was posted previously for our legal records and we do not support his claims because we are parties to the permanent Treaty signed by Kamehameha III and aware of the Protectorate Treaty of 2854, and the Neutrality Treaty of 1854, etc.:

Saturday, January 29, 2022

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Untwisting the International Law Version of the Overthrow in 1893 by the U.S.

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Untwisting the International Law Version of the Overthrow  in 1893 by the U.S. 


                                                                           Review by Amelia Gora (2022)


 The international Law Version of the Overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893 by the U.S.reviewed by Keanu Sai, P.D/ also known as David Keanu Sai details a twisted explanation detailing a supposed legal explanation  on the National Education Associations website article.

Facts Checked 

Sai erroneously concludes that there was no friendship treaty and follows the writings of  Judge Crawford in his book The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed., 2006). 

Note: 

The Treaty between the Kingdom  of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom  and the United States shows  who  the players are.

Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli, his heirs and successors and U.S. President Zachary Taylor are parties to the Treaty ratified in 1850. 


Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States - A perpetual friendship/peace and amity Treaty ratified by U.S. President Zachary Taylor,   U.S. Congress and Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli in 1850


The Treaty exists but Sais detailed article combining international law documents otherwise:

 Despite the unprecedented prolonged nature of the illegal occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom by the United States, the Hawaiian State, as a subject of international law, is afforded all the protection that international law provides. “Belligerent occupation,” concludes Judge Crawford in his book The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed., 2006), “does not affect the continuity of the State, even where there exists no government claiming to represent the occupied State (p. 34).” Without a treaty of peace, the laws of war and neutrality would continue to apply.


CONCLUSION

Sais failure in showin a treaty of peace leads one to believe that the war and neutrality existed then in 1893 and exists today.

The fact  of the matter is that a disregard for the permanent peace/friendship and amity treaty has existed since 1874 because of the claim that Lot Kamehameha/ Kamehameha V was the last of the Kamehameha's by Sanford B. Dole.

Note:  The move to extinguish Kamehameha IIIs heirs and successors began in 1874 with Sanford B. Doles article showing  the last of the Kamehameha's.  The purpose?  No Kamehameha's means No Treaty players.  The Treaty goes away.  The people are disrespected, etc.

Reference:

 https://maoliworld.com/forum/topics/opposition-to-the-hawaiian-roll-s-etc-sent-to-u-s-president-obama?page=6&commentId=2011971%3AComment%3A469472&x=1#2011971Comment469472


Premeditation/plans to annex Hawaii to the United States were made since 1826.  See article about John Foster who directed the overthrow in 1893.  Foster was the Secretary of State under U.S. President Benjamin Harrison.

The extinguishing of Kamehameha IIIs heirs and successors would mean that there would be no treaty because only Kamehameha IIIs family would be able to continue the Perpetual peace and amity treaty which directly affected the U.S. Constitution of 1787, and the supremacy clause Article 6 - Treaties were the Supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges were bound as well.

Note** - the U.S. became bankrupt in 1865 due to the American Civil War costs and was no longer able to treaty with other nations.

Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli engaged and agreed to a Protectorate by the United States, Great Britain, and France in 1854.

Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli also made a Proclamation of Neutrality in 1854 which was also served to the United States in 1854.

Reference:

Review by Amelia Gora (2021). Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli made a Neutrality Proclamation and Had the Proclamations served to the U.S., Great Britain, ...

Kamehameha IV, Kamehameha V, King Lunalilo, and King Kalakaua maintained a peaceful, neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.

Queen Liliuokalani maintained a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation as well.

U.S. President Cleveland reminded Americans of the Neutrality Laws and how it would be a military exercise or expedition if it was not respected.

Reference:

Reference:


Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli informed all that if the Neutrality Laws were not respected, then the issue would be piracy. 

Also due to the documented premeditations discovered in research, evidence shows that U.S. President Grover Cleveland did give Hawaii back to Queen Liliuokalani, the blatant disregard by U.S. President William McKinley who formed a government under the United States second nation called the American Empire, the U.S. did engage in illegally annexing a independent, neutral, friendly, non-violent sovereign nation and did a 

“ Crime against peace
A crime against peace, in international law, is "planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of wars of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing". Wikipedia 

Note:  Due to documented conspiracies, breaches, Fraud, Piracies, then the U.S. must pay rents, remove toxins, etc. and return all that does  not belong to them.

Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli documented that the U.S. and Great Britain could not own lands in the Hawaiian Kingdom /Kingdom  of Hawaii

Note:  

Both  the timeline   and important events are missing  in the article - for example: 

- U.S. President Cleveland gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, 1894, and 1897 and he left office in 1897;  

- U.S. President Cleveland had the American flag removed in Hawaii then the new U.S. President McKinley ordered the flag to be raised shortly after.  

- The newly elected U.S. President McKinley created two (2) governments and created the Territory of the United States under the American Empire 

- and McKinley started a War with Spain  in 1898.

The timeline is missing in the article and 

- fails to show that U.S. President McKinley failed to follow the U.S. Constitution of 1787 and 

- failed to obtain the U.S. Congress approval for War with Spain until four (4)  days later.


Importantly, piracies were disregarded in the international arena it seems, and lies were allowed.

Research incomplete.


aloha.



Reference:

https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/illegal-overthrow-hawaiian-kingdom-government#:~:text=The%20Hawaiian%20Kingdom%20entered%20into%20three%20treaties%20with%20the%20United,the%20Exchange%20of%20Money%20Orders.

NEA News

The Illegal Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom Government

Published: 04/02/2018

STATUS OF THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

In 2001, the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s arbitral tribunal, in Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom, declared “in the nineteenth century the Hawaiian Kingdom existed as an independent State recognized as such by the United States of America, the United Kingdom and various other States, including by exchanges of diplomatic or consular representatives and the conclusion of treaties.” The terms State and Country are synonymous.

As an independent State, the Hawaiian Kingdom entered into extensive treaty relations with a variety of States establishing diplomatic relations and trade agreements. The Hawaiian Kingdom entered into three treaties with the United States: 1849 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation; 1875 Commercial Treaty of Reciprocity; and 1883 Convention Concerning the Exchange of Money Orders. In 1893 there were only 44 independent and sovereign States, which included the Hawaiian Kingdom, as compared to 197 today.

On January 1, 1882, it joined the Universal Postal Union. Founded in 1874, the UPU was a forerunner of the United Nations as an organization of member States. Today the UPU is presently a specialized agency of the United Nations.

By 1893, the Hawaiian Kingdom maintained over ninety Legations and Consulates throughout the world. In the United States of America, the Hawaiian Kingdom manned a diplomatic post called a legation in Washington, D.C., which served in the same function as an embassy today, and consulates in the cities of New York, San Francisco, Philadelphia, San Diego, Boston, Portland, Port Townsend and Seattle. The United States manned a legation in Honolulu, and consulates in the cities of Honolulu, Hilo, Kahului and Mahukona.

“Traditional international law was based upon a rigid distinction between the state of peace and the state of war (p. 45),” says Judge Greenwood in his article “Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law” in The Handbook of the International Law of Military Occupations (2nd ed., 2008), “Countries were either in a state of peace or a state of war; there was no intermediate state (Id.).” This is also reflected by the fact that the renowned jurist of international law, Professor Lassa Oppenheim, separated his treatise on International Law into two volumes, Vol. I—Peace, and Vol. II—War and Neutrality.

PRESIDENTIAL INVESTIGATION OF THE OVERTHROW OF THE HAWAIIAN GOVERNMENT

On January 16, 1893, United States troops invaded the Hawaiian Kingdom without just cause, which led to a conditional surrender by the Hawaiian Kingdom’s executive monarch, Her Majesty Queen Lili‘uokalani, the following day. Her conditional surrender read:

“I, Liliuokalani, by the grace of God and under the constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom, Queen, do hereby solemnly protest against any and all acts done against myself and the constitutional Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom by certain persons claiming to have established a provisional government of and for this Kingdom.

That I yield to the superior force of the United States of America, whose minister plenipotentiary, His Excellency John L. Stevens, has caused United States troops to be landed at Honolulu and declared that he would support the said provisional government.

Now, to avoid any collision of armed forces and perhaps the loss of life, I do, under this protest, and impelled by said force, yield my authority until such time as the Government of the United States shall, upon the facts being presented to it, undo the action of its representatives and reinstate me in the authority which I claim as the constitutional sovereign of the Hawaiian Islands.”

Executive Council of the Provisional Government (The Bishop Museum)

In response to the Queen’s conditional surrender of her authority, President Grover Cleveland initiated an investigation on March 11, 1893, with the appointment of Special Commissioner James Blount whose duty was to “investigate and fully report to the President all the facts [he] can learn respecting the condition of affairs in the Hawaiian Islands, the causes of the revolution by which the Queen’s Government was overthrown, the sentiment of the people toward existing authority, and, in general, all that can fully enlighten the President touching the subjects of [his] mission (p. 1185).” After arriving in the Hawaiian Islands, he began his investigation on April 1, and by July 17, the fact-finding investigation was complete with a final report. Secretary of State Walter Gresham was receiving periodic reports from Special Commissioner Blount and was preparing a final report to the President.

On October 18, 1893, Secretary of State Gresham reported to the President, the “Provisional Government was established by the action of the American minister and the presence of the troops landed from the Boston, and its continued existence is due to the belief of the Hawaiians that if they made an effort to overthrow it, they would encounter the armed forces of the United States.” He further stated that the “Government of Hawaii surrendered its authority under a threat of war, until such time only as the Government of the United States, upon the facts being presented to it, should reinstate the constitutional sovereign, and the Provisional Government was created ‘to exist until terms of union with the United States of America have been negotiated and agreed upon (p. 462).’” Gresham then concluded, “Should not the great wrong done to a feeble but independent State by an abuse of the authority of the United States be undone by restoring the legitimate government? Anything short of that will not, I respectfully submit, satisfy the demands of justice (p. 463).”

INVESTIGATION CONCLUDES UNITED STATES COMMITTED ACTS OF WAR AGAINST THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM

One month later, on December 18, 1893, the President proclaimed by manifesto, in a message to the United States Congress, the circumstances for committing acts of war against the Hawaiian Kingdom that transformed a state of peace to a state of war on January 16, 1893. Black’s Law Dictionary defines a war manifesto as a “formal declaration, promulgated…by the executive authority of a state or nation, proclaiming its reasons and motives for…war.” And according to Professor Oppenheim in his seminal publication, International Law, vol. 2 (1906), a “war manifesto may…follow…the actual commencement of war through a hostile act of force (p. 104).”

Addressing the unauthorized landing of United States troops in the capital city of the Hawaiian Kingdom, President Cleveland stated, “on the 16th day of January, 1893, between four and five o’clock in the afternoon, a detachment of marines from the United States steamer Boston, with two pieces of artillery, landed at Honolulu. The men, upwards of 160 in all, were supplied with double cartridge belts filled with ammunition and with haversacks and canteens, and were accompanied by a hospital corps with stretchers and medical supplies (p. 451).”

President Cleveland ascertained that this “military demonstration upon the soil of Honolulu was of itself an act of war, unless made either with the consent of the Government of Hawaii or for the bona fide purpose of protecting the imperiled lives and property of citizens of the United States. But there is no pretense of any such consent on the part of the Government of the Queen, which at that time was undisputed and was both the de facto and the de jure government. In point of fact the existing government instead of requesting the presence of an armed force protested against it (p. 451).” He then stated, “a candid and thorough examination of the facts will force the conviction that the provisional government owes its existence to an armed invasion by the United States (p. 454).”

“War begins,” says Professor Wright in his article “Changes in the Conception of War,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 18 (1924), “when any state of the world manifests its intention to make war by some overt act, which may take the form of an act of war (p. 758).” According to Professor Hall in his book International Law (4th ed., 1895), the “date of the commencement of a war can be perfectly defined by the first act of hostility (p. 391).”

The President also determined that when “our Minister recognized the provisional government the only basis upon which it rested was the fact that the Committee of Safety had in the manner above stated declared it to exist. It was neither a government de facto nor de jure (p. 453).” He unequivocally referred to members of the so-called Provisional Government as insurgents, whereby he stated, and “if the Queen could have dealt with the insurgents alone her course would have been plain and the result unmistakable. But the United States had allied itself with her enemies, had recognized them as the true Government of Hawaii, and had put her and her adherents in the position of opposition against lawful authority. She knew that she could not withstand the power of the United States, but she believed that she might safely trust to its justice.” He then concluded that by “an act of war, committed with the participation of a diplomatic representative of the United States and without authority of Congress, the Government of a feeble but friendly and confiding people has been overthrown (p. 453).”

In August 1898, the Hawaiian flag was lowered from Iolani Palace and replaced by the flag of the United States of America.

“Act of hostility unless it be done in the urgency of self-preservation or by way of reprisals,” according to Hall, “is in itself a full declaration of intent [to wage war] (p. 391).” According to Professor Wright in his article “When does War Exist,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 26(2) (1932), “the moment legal war begins…statutes of limitation cease to operate (p. 363).” He also states that war “in the legal sense means a period of time during which the extraordinary laws of war and neutrality have superseded the normal law of peace in the relations of states (Id.).”

Unbeknownst to the President at the time he delivered his message to the Congress, a settlement, through executive mediation, was reached between the Queen and United States Minister Albert Willis in Honolulu. The agreement of restoration, however, was never implemented. Nevertheless, President Cleveland’s manifesto was a political determination under international law of the existence of a state of war, of which there is no treaty of peace. More importantly, the President’s manifesto is paramount and serves as actual notice to all States of the conduct and course of action of the United States. These actions led to the unlawful overthrow of the government of an independent and sovereign State. When the United States commits acts of hostilities, the President, says Associate Justice Sutherland in his book Constitutional Power and World Affairs (1919), “possesses sole authority, and is charged with sole responsibility, and Congress is excluded from any direct interference (p. 75).”

According to Representative Marshall, before later became Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, in his speech in the House of Representatives in 1800, the “president is the sole organ of the nation in its external relations, and its sole representative with foreign nations. Of consequence, the demand of a foreign nation can only be made of him (Annals of Congress, vol. 10, p. 613).” Professor Wright in his book The Control of American Foreign Relations (1922), goes further and explains that foreign States “have accepted the President’s interpretation of the responsibilities [under international law] as the voice of the nation and the United States has acquiesced (p. 25).”

Despite the unprecedented prolonged nature of the illegal occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom by the United States, the Hawaiian State, as a subject of international law, is afforded all the protection that international law provides. “Belligerent occupation,” concludes Judge Crawford in his book The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed., 2006), “does not affect the continuity of the State, even where there exists no government claiming to represent the occupied State (p. 34).” Without a treaty of peace, the laws of war and neutrality would continue to apply.”


Timeline from 1800 trou 


International Law Discussions


1800 - Representative Marshall:  


“According to Representative Marshall, before later became Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, in his speech in the House of Representatives in 1800, the “president is the sole organ of the nation in its external relations, and its sole representative with foreign nations. Of consequence, the demand of a foreign nation can only be made of him (Annals of Congress, vol. 10, p. 613).” ”


1906 - “And according to Professor Oppenheim in his seminal publication, International Law, vol. 2 (1906), a “war manifesto may…follow…the actual commencement of war through a hostile act of force (p. 104).” ”


1919 - Constitutional Power and World Affairs by Associate Justice Sutherland:


“Unbeknownst to the President at the time he delivered his message to the Congress, a settlement, through executive mediation, was reached between the Queen and United States Minister Albert Willis in Honolulu. The agreement of restoration, however, was never implemented. Nevertheless, President Cleveland’s manifesto was a political determination under international law of the existence of a state of war, of which there is no treaty of peace. More importantly, the President’s manifesto is paramount and serves as actual notice to all States of the conduct and course of action of the United States. These actions led to the unlawful overthrow of the government of an independent and sovereign State. When the United States commits acts of hostilities, the President, says Associate Justice Sutherland in his book Constitutional Power and World Affairs (1919), “possesses sole authority, and is charged with sole responsibility, and Congress is excluded from any direct interference (p. 75).”


1922 - The Control of American Foreign Relations by Professor Writ



2006 -  “ “Belligerent occupation,” concludes Judge Crawford in his book The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed., 2006), “does not affect the continuity of the State, even where there exists no government claiming to represent the occupied State (p. 34).” Without a treaty of peace, the laws of war and neutrality would continue to apply. ”


Iolani Title.png



   

The Legitimate government in Hawaii Series:  Review of the Infiltration of the Constitutional Monarchy government in Hawaii


                                                                        Review by Amelia Gora (2022) 

Notice how many are eager to celebrate the 1893, January 17 date of the wrongful  Overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani?

In actuality everyone should look at it as a time when the U.S. became documented Pirates in the world.

The real celebration to be had is  the   Facts Found /the Truth leading to the wrongful,   planned, premeditated overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani!

A Concert of Pirates Plans

The following   are facts found which shows that there was No Annexation,   Hawaii was given back to Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, 1894, and 1897 by U.S. President rover Cleveland who recognized that the Royal government is the Legitimate government in Hawaii.

Some of the most important articles are:

1822 - Secret Treaty of Verona - which shows the moves by nations in collusion who looked to break down Monarchy governments world wide which included Austria, France, Prussia, Russia, reat Britain, the Vatican, and the United States.




1840 -  The Kingdom  of Hawaiis Monarchy government became a Constitutional Monarchy when Kamehameha III   signed a Constitution.

1841 - Belgium was the first to recognize the Kingdom  of Hawaii.

1844 - An Agent for the United States claimed to have been the first to recognize the Kingdom  of Hawaii which was printed in the newspapers.

1845 - Kamehameha III had a retraction printed denying that the U.S. was over other nations in recognizing Hawaii and had a reprint made showing that Great Britain was also in a like place.

1850 - A Permanent   Treaty of Amity and Friendship was signed and ratified by both the Kingdom  of Hawaii and the United States President Zachary Taylor.

1852 - A Constitution was signed which included the anti-slavery law.  

Note:  the United States signed into law an anti-slavery law which was worded similarly to the law documented in the Kingdom  of Hawaii thirteen years later or in 1865.


 1854 - A Proclamation of Neutrality was made and signed by Kamehameha III, and served to the United States and many other nations.

Reference:
Review by Amelia Gora (2021). Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli made a Neutrality Proclamation and Had the Proclamations served to the U.S., Great Britain, ...

1854 --  A Protectorate was agreed to by the United States, Great Britain, and France over the Kingdom  of Hawaii.

1864 - A Constitution was signed by Kamehameha  V.
Note:  It Abrogated the 1852 Constitution which included the anti-slavery law.
Definitions. To formally annul or repeal a law through an act of the legislature, constitutional authority, or custom. In contract and insurance law, it is to rescind or terminate a contract.

Important note:  Former American Civil War General Alfred Hartwell selected as a Judge by Kamehameha V, influenced many changes in laws and did participate in the overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893.
 
Reference:

Jan 29, 2017 — researched by Amelia Gora (2017) The following American Civil War Generals were found in the Hawaiian Isl… ... 5) Alfred Hartwell.
Oct 29, 2016 — Background on A.S. Hartwell, a Conspirator: He was an Honorary Brevet Brigadier General working under President Lincoln in the American Civil ...

1887 - A Constitution was signed by King David Kalakaua wo was forced to sign with  a gun to  his head.  The Constitution was prepared by the White Supremacists who stripped the King of his rights.

Note:  King Kalakaua was under duress  which means that the 1887 Constitution was null and void.

1891 -  Queen Liliuokalani took office based on the  White  Supremacists 1887 Constitution which shhad called the Bayonnet Constitution.

Note:  The Queen attempted to remove the Constitution by having the 1864 Constitution re-entered into the government laws.

Extra Note:  King David Kalakauas Constitution was signed under duress which made the Constitution that he signed a fraud and illegal document.  Queen Liliuokalani too was under duress makinthe 1887 Constitution illegal.

1892 -  Benjamin Tracy of the U.S. Navy met wit Samuel Andrews relative of Lorrin Thurston in Makua Valley, Oahu, and helped to plan the overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani.

Other activities/groups were getting ready to overthrow  the Queen and through research has been recorded.  See articles posted in the IOLANI - the Royal Hawk for other important information.  see: http://theiolani.blogspot.com/

John Foster, Secretary of State under U.S. President Benjamin Harrison directed the overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani.  See article about John Foster:

Jan 5, 2021 — PLUNDERING UPON THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM/KINGDOM OF HAWAII SINCE THE MISSIONARIES/ MERCENARIES ARRIVAL IN 1820 …
Read John Foster's article....a whistleblower out of history documents. ... Amelia Gora Reference: John Foster, he helped direct the overthrow article --an ...
Feb 23, 2020 — The constitution was enacted on October 8, 1840, by King Kamehameha III and Kekāuluohi as Kuhina Nui, an office similar to .
Prime Minister or ...
Conspiracies Planned, Set, and Moves Made

The stage was set for the White Supremacists and their planned organizations to shoot, kill, hang, guillotine, drown, scalp, turn into slaves, beat up, kill, treat inhumanely, etc. those who did not help to overthrow  the Queen in 1893.

Reference:

Feb 18, 2020 — posted by Amelia Gora (2020) ... Yes, the Hawaiian Kingdom's history includes killing, enslaving, imprisoning, ... 153) Oxnard, Henry T.

Masons, Freemasons arrived in Hawaii a few weeks before the overthrow, and a parade to celebrate their city called Honolulu, Oahu.

Note:  Masons, Freemasons were operatives who arrived in Hawaii to assist in overtrowing a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.  They arrived from various nations and operated in concert with the Sharpshooter's, the Army in Hawaii, missionaries/mercenaries, Portuguese community, Punahou schools administrators and students, and Kamehameha Schools administrators and students.

Reference:

1893 - The BOSTON warship was given orders on January 9 to enter Honolulu to assist in protecting the lives and safety of Americans.

1893 - Queen Liliuokalani was overthrown by White Supremacists whhad wanted Hawaii since 1826.  

The U.S. was bankrupt and nearly out of gold.  A U.S. Representative had asked for loans and were denied during King Kalakauas time.


The American Civil War had rendered the U.S. government, Great Britain bankrupt due to the costs of War.  Funding was gotten from the Bank of England, etc. and loans were due.

Queen Liliuokalani destroyed the new Constitution that she introduced,...it was actually   th1864 Constitution rewritten.

1893, 1894, 1897 - U.S. President Grover Cleveland gave Hawaii back to Queen Liliuokalani.

U.S. President Grover Cleveland did remind Americans of the Neutrality laws which was basically ignored by men who failed to follow rule of law, international laws, and acted as Pirates against a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.

U.S. President William McKinley

Failed to follow the U.S. Constitution of 1787, the Hawaiian Constitution of 1864 - the 1887 Constitution was made by the White Supremacists and forced on King David Kalakaua, and Queen Liliuokalani which was illegal.


The Kamehameha Dynasty Continued

King David Kalakaua and Queen Liliuokalani were part of the Kamehameha Dynasty:  

Their mother Keohokalole was a hanai/adopted daughter  of a Kamehameha descendant named Nahuina, child of hanuna son of Kaoleioku, the Oldest son of Kamehameha with Kanekapolei.  hanuna was the brother of Pauahi, mother of Ruth Keelikolani, brother of Konia, the mother of Bernice Pauahi who married one of thheads of the overthrow  conspirators named Charles Reed Bishop, banker, and Pirate of the Pacific.

Bernice Pauahi Bishop was also the stepsister of Kalola, Kaluaikau, Alapai, Abigail Maheha et. als  her hanai/adopted sister was Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani.

Note:  Queen Liliuokalani was a party to the 1850 Treaty of Amity, and Friendship with the United States.  She too was an heir, and a successor of Kamehameha III.

Queen Liliuokalani was also a party to the Neutrality Law of 1854 which  was signed by Kamehameha III.

Note:  Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution documents that Treaties are the supreme law of the land and Judges are to also adhere to that as well.

Extra Note:  U.S. President McKinley, et. als. failed to follow the rules of law which included the U.S. Constitution as well.

1897   - Opposition to Annexation was made by Queen Liliuokalani and 40,000 of her subjects.

1898 - U.S. President William McKinley created another nation for the U.S. called the American Empire and placed Territories that had no Treaties on that list.

Reference:
Peacock vs. Republic of Hawaii, Hawaiian reports, Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.  

McKinley had the Army, Navy, and other personnel develop the Territory of the United States then had it called the Territory of Hawaii. 

The United States maintained the second nation which operated with nations that had treaties intact.

Note:  McKinley disregarded the Kingdom  of Hawaii as having an active Treaty with the United States.  It was Sanford B. Dole who wrote an article claiming that Kamehameha V was the last of the Kamehameha's in 1874.  Later the claims were also made for Bernice Pauahi Bishop, then   Ruth Keelikolani.

Also note:  By claiming the last of the Kamehameha's, the Treaty of 1850 would not be in effect.  But wrong, the Kamehameha's  existed then and their descendants exist  even today.  The treaty is a permanent friendship and amity treaty.

1959 - U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed an executive order making the Territory of Hawaii - created by the U.S. which was under the American Empire, and made it a State with a shared sovereignty or 1/50 interest in the sovereignty of the United States.

Note:  The Kingdom  of Hawaii /Hawaiian Kingdom  as full sovereignty and remains a separate, independent nation which never went away.  

1969 - An article appeared about the SEIZURE of Hawaii which shows that there was NO ANNEXATION.

2000 - The U.S. Justice Department had an article showing that Hawaii was not legally annexed by the U.S.

2015 - Law School head and Law Professor Williamson Chang researched the moves towards Annexation and found that it is not possible for the U.S.(or any nation) to Annex another sovereign nation.

See:  
Feb 16, 2015 — by Amelia Gora (2015) ... see the article "Thirty Days of Hawaiian History" from the PACIFIC ... OHA 29th #3 with Williamson B C Chang.
2018 - United Nations Dr. Alfred deZayas recognized that the Kingdom  of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom  exists and the U.S. is indeed an occupier meaning there was NO ANNEXATION!

Reference
May 10, 2019 — Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter, and the First Letter to Routhe Bolomet Validating the Existence of the ... posted by Amelia Gora (2019).

SUMMARY 

The Kingdom  of Hawaii /Hawaiian Kingdom  exists wit full sovereignty.   
 
The State of Hawaii as a 1/50 sovereignty for bein a created part of the United States with
 the criminal efforts of U.S. President William McKinley who failed to follow rule of law, disregarded the Kamehameha's existence, failed to follow the Neutrality Laws, International laws, failed to respect the Treaty signed by U.S. President Zachary Taylor and supported the genocide activities against kanaka maoli who remain a neutral, friendly, non-violent operating nation.  

The Kingdom  of Hawaii /Hawaiian Kingdom  exists with Full Sovereignty - 100% vs. a Pirate created entity called the State  of Hawaii with 1/50% sovereignty shared with 49 other States which makes up the United States or full sovereignty equal to the Kingdom  of Hawaii/ Hawaiian Kingdom.

Apologies were not accepted by the Royal Family which was an apology Public Law/ P.L. 103-150  from U.S. President William Clinton in 1993.

U.S. Senators Akaka and Daniel Inouye represented the Pirate created 1/50% for the occupying  entity called the State of Hawaii..

Our Constitutional Monarchy government continues on as well as our Royal Family, descendants and heirs of Kamehameha who ruled as the Kin in 1810 with knowledge that the U.S. wanted to Annex us since 1826 as documented by John Foster, Secretary of State under U.S. Benjamin Harrison in 1893.

Kamehameha lll through Queen Liliuokalani and our Royal Family today maintains a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.

Rents are due, and our Kingdom  of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdoms records needs to be returned, etc..

aloha.



References:

Correction: Our Royal Families - Part 3


OUR ROYAL FAMILIES - Part 3 or Corrected Version: Introducing the Crown Land, etc. Owners: The Royal Families/ Kamehameha's: Some of the Descendants/Heirs Found in Research by Amelia Gora (2015)


OUR ROYAL FAMILIES - Part 3
In the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii/
Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/He Mokupuni Pae Aina o Hawaii/Hawaiian
Islands/ Hawaiian archipelago/Hawaii or

Corrected Version:  Introducing the Crown Land, etc. Owners: The Royal Families/ Kamehameha's: Some of the Descendants/Heirs Found in Research by Amelia Gora (2015)

  •  

Corrected Version:  Introducing the Crown Land, etc. Owners:  The Royal Families/Kamehameha's: Some of the Descendants/Heirs Found in Research
                                                                                  by Amelia Gora (2015)
The following are some of the Descendants/Heirs of Kamehameha Found in Research.  
Introducing the Royal Families who are the Crown Land, etc. Owners who are not subject to the laws, have sovereignty, maintain all non-treasonous persons/kanaka maoli and subjects of the Hawaiian Kingdom, and maintaining the 1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America, Treaty with Japan, Treaty with the Netherlands, Convention with Portugal, Convention with Russia, Treaty with Spain, Treaty with Sweden and Norway, Treaty with the Swiss Confederation, Postal Convention with Tahiti, etc.:
Kamehameha's Family/Bloodlines/Heirs/Children/Descendants:
1)  Kaoleioku - his four (4) children were:  Pauahi (w); Hanuna/Hanuno (k); Keola (k) and Konia (w)
2)  Kanekapolei (2) - her children were:  Kikau (k); u.i. others/research incomplete
3)  Kahiwa Kanekapolei - her children were:  Kepelino (k); u.i. others/research incomplete
4)  Keliiokahekili (w) - her children were: u.i. others/research incomplete
5)  Liholiho/Kamehameha II - research incomplete
6)  Kauikeaouli/Kamehameha III - his children were 10:  Keawe 1(k); Keawe 2 (k); Opunui (k); Kekipi;                          Keawe; Mahoe (w); Kahalaoa; Papa; Nalimu; and Albert Kunuiakea.  His hanai                                            hookama/ adopted and inherited sovereignty:  Alexander Liholiho/Kamehameha IV;                                 Hueu Davis, Kale Davis (w), and Peke Davis (w)
7) Nahienaena (w) - her u.i. child/research incomplete
8) Kamamalu (w) - married Liholiho/Kamehameha II her step brother - no children
9)  Kinau (w) - married Liholiho/Kamehameha II her step brother - no children
10)  Kinau (k) - his children were:  Miriam Kekauonohi/Kekauonohi (w); Maulili (k); and                      
                        Keliikanakaole/Kanakaole (k)
11)  Kalanihelemaiiluna Paki (k) - his children were:  Kalaniulumoku (k) and Abner Paki (k)
12)  Kahalaia (k) - was with Pauahi (w) the mother of Ruth Keelikolani; also married Kekuanaoa (k)
13)  Kapapauai (w) - child u.i. - research incomplete
14)  6 other u.i. siblings of Liholiho/Kamehameha II; Kauikeaouli/Kamehameha III; and
                         Nahienaena  (w) - research incomplete        
Kamehameha's had 19 Children, which includes those being researched.              
 Discussion:
So, the foreigners claimed that Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V was the "last of the Kamehameha's"
In 1874, Sanford B. Dole, a treasonous, conspirator, pillager, pirate did write an article stating that Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V(died in 1872) was the "last of the Kamehameha's".,  see the article "Thirty Days of Hawaiian History" from the PACIFIC  COMMERCIAL ADVERTISER at:  http://theiolani.blogspot.com/2014/05/vol-iv-no-494-wednesday-weekl...
Sanford B. Dole was one of the planners of taking over the King's/Queen's position or the Royal Families genealogies, lands, assets, resources since the 1870's.  
The other planners included Charles Reed Bishop, husband of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, who was a hanai sister/adopted sister of Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, Ruth Keelikolani, et. als.  
Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V died in 1872.
Ruth Keelikolani died in 1883.  
 Ruth Keelikolani was also called "the last of the Kamehameha's" by the foreigners.  She died in 1883.
Ruth Keelikolani died in 1883 and it was claimed to have left all of her lands to Bernice Pauahi Bishop who was also claimed to be "the last of the Kamehameha's" by the foreigners, a lie that was promoted and perpetuated by treasonous, conspirators, pirates, pillagers named Sanford B. Dole, Charles Reed Bishop and Friends, et. als.
  
The Truth:
Kamehameha had a total of 19+ children.
Royal Families are Not subject to the laws.  Kamehameha's descendants/heirs existed and were living in Kamehameha's life time.  
Let us review where "the last of the Kamehameha's" Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, Bernice Pauahi Bishop, and Ruth Keelikolani came from:
Kamehameha's  three (3) of his 19 children and their children:
Child #9:                                                         Child #1:                                             Child #11: 
Kinau (w)               ( step siblings)          Kaoleioku (k)                                   Kalanihelemaiiluna Paki (k)
      /                                                                        /                                                                                      /
Moses Kaikioewa                          Pauahi (w) daughter:  Ruth Keelikolani (w) 1) Kalaniulumoku(k)
David Kamehameha                     Hanuna (k) children: Kapule, Kini(w),Hookahi(w),  2) Abner Paki(k)
Lot Kamehameha/                                                   and  Poohina (w)                                          /
  Kamehameha V                      Konia (w) daughter:  Bernice Pauahi (w)     Bernice Pauahi
Alexander Liholiho/                         hanai daughter:  Kaeha/ Makaeha/
   Kamehameha IV                             Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani                         Kalaniulumoku (k) ch:
Victoria Kamamalu                     Keola (k)                                                                               Kalola (w), Alapai(k)
                                                                                                                                                           Kaluaikau(w),
hanai/adopted:  Bernice Pauahi (w)                                                                                  Jane Loeau (w)                                                                                                                                                               Abigail Maheha(w)
                                                                                                                                                           P.F. Koakanu (k)
                                                                                                                                                                et. als.,
step children:  Paalua/Palua/Kapaalua (k) (from Mataio Kekuanaoa's 1st wife - Kalehua)
                            Ruth Keelikolani (w) (from Mataio Kekuanaoa's 2nd wife - Pauahi)
                             John Kapena (k) (from Mataio Kekuanaoa's 5th wife - Kalima/Kalimakuhi/Kamahine)
                             Sam Kapena (k)  (from Mataio Kekuanaoa's 5th wife - Kalima/Kalimakuhi/Kamahine)
                             Umiokalani (w) (from Mataio Kekuanaoa's 5th wife - Kalima/Kalimakuhi/Kamahine)
                             
Note:  Kinau (w) and Pauahi (w) were two of the five (5) widows of Liholiho/Kamehameha II.
1) Mataio Kekuanaoa, House of Nobles member, married  Kalehua - Son:  Paalua/Palua/Kapaalua(k)
2) Mataio Kekuanaoa married Pauahi (w)  - Daughter:  Ruth Keelikolani.  
3)  Mataio Kekuanaoa married Kinau (w) - Children:  Moses; David; Lot/Kamehameha V;
                                                                                  Alexander Liholiho/Kamehameha IV; Victoria Kamamalu;
                                                                                  hanai:  Bernice Pauahi
4)  Mataio Kekuanaoa married Kaloloahilani/Kalolo (w) - no children
5)  Mataio Kekuanaoa married step sister:  Kalima/Kalimakuhi/Kamahine (w) - her children were
                                               John Kapena, Sam Kapena, Umiokalani (w), Alenoho (k), Kapehe (w) et, aks
 Mataio Kekuanaoa had a total of five (5) marriages.
Mataio Kekuanaoa had a Probate disregarding the fact that he was a Permanent member of the House of Nobles, a Sovereign successor through his ancestor Kaumualii.
Mataio Kekuanaoa was part of the Royal Families who are not subject to the laws.
Mataio Kekuanaoa, a successor, a non-Kamehameha descendant/heir of was made heir of a Kamehameha descendant Victoria Kamamalu by the First Circuit Court Judge.
When Mataio Kekuanaoa died, his heir was Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, younger brother of step sister Ruth Keelikolani and hanai sister Bernice Pauahi /Bernice Pauahi Bishop, et. als..
Ruth Keelikolani  who was not the only heir, left her interest to her hanai sister Bernice Pauahi/Bernice Pauahi Bishop.
Problematic Issues
1)  Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, younger brother of step sister Ruth Keelikolani and hanai sister Bernice Pauahi /Bernice Pauahi Bishop were Not the "last of the Kamehameha's".
2)  Kamehameha had a total of 19+ children and the three - Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, younger brother of step sister Ruth Keelikolani and hanai sister Bernice Pauahi /Bernice Pauahi Bishop were from  three (3) out of his 19+ children.
3)  All three (3) were Kamehameha's descendants leaving first cousins existing who were also descendants/heirs of Kamehameha.
4)  All three (3) were Kamehameha's descendants, part of the Royal Families who were Not subject to the laws, as with their siblings/step siblings/cousins who were Kamehameha's descendants/heirs.
5)  They were and remain beneficiaries, reciprocal beneficiaries of all of Kamehameha's lands which includes the Crown Lands, etc.
6)  It was the desire/greed/lust, etc. of the non Royal Families/foreigners/whites/Americans, et., als. to assume Kamehameha's lands since their arrival in the Hawaiian Islands.
7)  The foreigners who made up the third part of the Hawaiian Government, a temporary, voted in position called the House of Representatives helped to dethrone Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, did conspire, premeditate, pirate, pillage lands, estates, trusts, etc. of the Royal Families.
They were treasonous and did belonged to the third part or temporary voted in part of the three-part government.  The permanent parts of the Hawaiian Government was headed by the Sovereign's / Kamehameha's heirs and successors, and the House of Nobles heirs and successors.
It was the treasonous group which dethroned Queen Liliuokalani and acted as the Provisional Government which was backed by the United States.  
The United States of America became the United States and the American Empire as documented in the Peacock vs. Hawaiian Republic case in 1899. ( see HAWAII REPORTS at the Archives, Main Library, or the Supreme Court Law Library,)
Queen Liliuokalani did state that those who dethroned her was an entity, neither de facto nor de jure.  Reason being that the treasonous persons were only part of the voted in, temporary body of a neutral, friendly, non violent nation which was supported by the United States, England, and the bankers - including the J.P. Morgan bankers who were the investors for bankrupt nations United States, and England due to their American Civil War losses, etc.
8)  The foreigners moved on the genealogies, the history, and the legal activities to accommodate themselves but have been discovered through research the criminal undertakings with the intent to defraud, assume, pirate, pillage what is not theirs, does not belong with documented evidence, etc.
9)  The 1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America, Article XIV is applied against all who have pirated, pillaged, against our Royal Families, which includes Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli's heirs/descendants and successors which includes Kalaniopuu's, Kamehameha I's, and Kaumualii's children, step children, hanai children/adopted children, and including the House of Nobles permanent members descendants/heirs documented in articles posted for the Judicial Tribunal evidence, etc.
SUMMARY
The above shows the 19+ heirs of Kamehameha, his children whose descendants/heirs exists today including myself, one of Kamehameha's descendants/heirs from four (4) of his children and  two (2) of his hanai/adopted children.
The above shows the Kamehameha heirs.  The successors list are posted at http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/our-royal-families-part-2 "Our Royal Families Part 2".
All of the above is part of the genealogy, history, legal research which uncovers the treasons, criminal frauds, the mega frauds, pillaging, piracy(ies), racketeering, corruption engaged in by the Americans supported by a bankrupt, corrupt, deviant nation which wrongfully Plundered upon a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation and wrongfully utilized villainous characters to conspire against the true land owners, the true title owners who maintains the 1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America, which recognizes the Constitution of the United States of America even today.
This evidence is also being used for the purposes of the Judicial Tribunal of the Hawaiian Kingdom, etc. and supports the reasons why it is Not O.K. to utilize our Families, our Nations funds for the use of Wars and wrongful Plundering Upon Innocents at our expense, etc.
There are legal reasons why the American Consulate needs to operate here because War crimes have been committed and crimes against our Royal Families, subjects, friends, and supporters is unacceptable.
Maintaining our Royal Families land claims, all kanaka maoli land claims in the Hawaiian Islands/ Hawaiian archipelago/Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/He Mokupuni Pae Aina o Hawaii/Hawaii and aloha.
                                                                  Amelia Gora, one of Kamehameha's descendants/heirs, successors,
                                                                 House of Nobles, Judicial Tribunal, Konohiki, Hawaiian
                                                                 Genealogical Society member - Hawaiian Kingdom
    



fyi...............a reminder, a keeper......

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by TK on April 8, 2008 at 3:45pm
Has anyone refuted or challenged Steven T. Newcomb after the article was published?
Permalink Reply by Yolanda Crisostomo on April 8, 2008 at 4:52pm
Aloha TK,

I don't know.

Yolanda
Permalink Reply by Tane on May 4, 2008 at 6:03pm
The US Supreme Court agrees with this analysis. They questioned Congress' jurisdiction. This was part of our argument decades ago, till today. The Ku'e Petitions are a key document to this argument that demonstrates that the Hawaii Nationals were opposed to it. The few who swore alligience to the Republic of Hawaii did so under duress as a means for employment to sustain themselves and their family. Others, the majority did not because they had their farms and not in the city of Honolulu. Under the Republic, the Hawaii nationals were not allowed to vote save a few who were landowners of a sizeable amount of land. The Republic was in name only and protected by the US military. Their presence in the first 75 days of the invasion was there specifically to protect the Provisional government set up by the US businessmen (Thurston, et al) and the US minister John Levitt Stevens under the guidance and approval of US Secy of State James Blaine and President Harrison. Thereafter, the US presence was more of a show of strength and monitoring what was ongoing to intimidate the people of Hawaii. They were afraid that Japan would step in and restore the Queen to the throne. Countries didn't want to go to war with the USA so kept their distance but watched the turn of events as this was an international concern.
Permalink Reply by Anston Kanehailua on May 4, 2008 at 8:15pm
Brah dis gottah be spread around to all the Hawaiians that don't know what really is going on
Permalink Reply by Tane on December 4, 2008 at 5:09pm
Help spread the word.
Permalink Reply by Amelia Gora 2 seconds ago
Delete
Stephen Newcombs article is an important one................fyi
Keep/Save for your files.............
Professor Williamson Chang's video/information is also very important........
  1. OHA 29th #3 with Williamson B C Chang

    • 8 months ago
    • 493 views
    OHA 29th #3 with Williamson B C Chang.
  2. Professor Williamson Chang Repo Attorney General 09-22-2014

    • 4 months ago
    • 2,994 views
    Press Conference on Letter of Professor Chang to Attorney General Eric Holder, and others, Statement of Professor Williamson ...
  3. Dr Chang Discusses Pu'uhonua Part One

    • 1 year ago
    • 83 views
    September 20, 2013 Dr. Williamson Chang, professor at the UH Manoa school of law talks to a group gathered by Ohana ...
  4. Iolani Palace with Williamson B.C. Chang 1-18-2014

    • 1 year ago
    • 433 views
    Williamson B.C. Chang Professor of Law Degrees AB Princeton University 1972 JD University of California, Berkeley 1975 ...

    1. Kiliwehi Kekumano Nanakuli DOI Testimonies

      • 7 months ago
      • 40 views
      This video is about Kiliwehi Kekumano Nanakuli DOI Testimonies.
    2. Ko Hawaiʻi Polokika-Politics of Hawaiʻi

      • Active 1 week ago
      • 14 videos
      An initiative to create a platform to educate about Hawaii's true political landscape and the Hawaiian Kingdom's continued illegal ...
      • CHANNEL
       
    3. William Aila DOI Nanakuli Testimony... is he lying? I'll let you de...

      • 7 months ago
      • 222 views
      DOI NANAKULI WILLIAM AILA TESTIMONY ON JUNE 24, 2014 @ NANAIKAPONO ELEMENTARY.
    ************************************************

Reminding everyone on the eve of American Holiday for Prince Kuhio, a traitor, a conspirator, PIRATE, supported by Americans and their 50% supporters living on the Crown Lands:
For the purpose of this article, some of the Paid off Hawaiians/kanaka maoli/treasonous/ conspirators, et. als. follows below:
*Prince Kuhio Kalanianaole Kuhio
******************************
Prince Kuhio Kalanianaole Treasonous Person introduced Statehood in 1920https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wMzY0NzE3ZDUtZGE5Mi00Zj...
Prince Kuhio Kalanianaole was not allowed to vote in Congress.....he was only allowed to talk:
Prince Kuhio Kalanianaole claimed Queen Liliuokalani Insane, entity Hawaii Court rules in favor of Treasonous persons Cleghorn, Smith, and Iaukea
Prince Kuhio took an out-of-court settlement to the claim of Queen Liliuokalani's denial that she signed a Trust Deed
see:
articles, posts, researches by Amelia Gora and editor of the
IOLANI - The Royal Hawk news on the web www.theiolani.blogspot.com
yahoogroups.com see hawaiian genealogy society and http://myweb.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037
Note: All the above articles indicate that he was not a supporter of Queen Liliuokalani. Kuhio was also a Mason/Freemason and friends of Charles Reed Bishop and conspirators/pirates of the Hawaiian Kingdom, our Queen, and aboriginal Hawaiians, kanaka maoli, Hawaiian Nationals.
Kanaka maoli were under duress, stress, usurpation, and coercion..........Premeditation to assume a neutral, friendly nation is documented..............what does that mean?  Ramifications ongoing.....
Reference: 

**************************
 
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40983414

******

Exposing Some of the Highlights of Research-Part 2 by Amelia Gora (2014)-Masons in Washington, D.C. and the Hawaiian Islands Affecting the Dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893

The following article shows some of the history of Washington, D.C. and that U.S. President George Washington was a "Grand Master Pro Tempore" of the Masonic Order when they celebrated a cornerstone in 1793......

The Hawaiian star. (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, October 16, 1893, Page 3, Image 3

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015415/1893-10-16/ed-1/s...

Print this image | Download this image

Page  

   

 

In 1892 (days before the criminal dethronement of our Queen, Queen Liliuokalani) a Masonic celebration was held which lay a "cornerstone" and the Masons proclaimed that Hawaii was the "home city of the Masons":

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, December 28, 1892, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1892-12-28/ed-1/s...

Print this image | Download this image

Page

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, December 28, 1892, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1892-12-28/ed-1/s...

Print this image | Download this image

Page  

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, December 28, 1892, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1892-12-28/ed-1/s...

Print this image | Download this image

Page  

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, December 28, 1892, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1892-12-28/ed-1/s...

Print this image | Download this image

Page  

   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGEFc3aVMyM  OLD HUNDRED - song mentioned above  

Note:  Many of the above names have been/will be listed in the Judicial Tribunal list.

In Thomas Allen's book NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY, etc. Allen stated that the Masons were set up to break down Monarchy Governments worldwide................ Conspiracy documented.

See https://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/exposing-some-of-the-highl... for Part 1.


There are many unresolved issues, which reveals that this is truly the CRIMINAL MECCA of the U.S., genocide issues 

 

Informing many because..............

  

Something STINKS...............(.and I know it's NOT ME) WICKED TO THE MAX!

aloha.

Tags: HawaiiHawaiianKingdomcorruptionfraudinparasitespiratespredatorsuncovered

https://maoliworld.com/main/search/search?q=kekauonohi&page=19

https://he-mokupuni-pae-aina-o-hawaii.blogspot.com/2018/04/important-historical-events-keep-for.html?m=0

https://maoliworld.com/forum/topics/the-legitimate-government-in-hawaii-series-more-evidence-of

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  More Evidence of Neutrality Breaches by Usurper Sanford B. Dole under the U.S. Protectorate

 The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  More Evidence of Neutrality Breaches by Usurper Sanford B. Dole under the U.S. Protectorate

 

                                                                        Review by Amelia Gora (2022)
 
 
The following article validates the fact that  usurper Sanford B. Dole was under the Protectorate of the U.S. which also means that the 
 
1)  U.S. breached the permanent friendship/peace and amity treaty, 
2)  the Protectorate Treaty of 1854, 
3)  and the neutrality laws of 1854 
 
The U.S. did breach the Neutrality laws maintained by the awaiian Kingdom /Kingdom  of  awaii since 1854 through 1893 and continuing on even today!

This is the Neutrality Proclamation by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli in 1854:

 

 

This is the 1896 Proclamation by U.S. President Grover Clevelands warning to Americans about the breaches of the Neutrality Law:

 

 

 

Self-Elected President Dole Evidence:

Hawaii holomua = Progress. [volume] (Honolulu) 1893-1895, June 04, 1894, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82016410/1894-06-04/ed-1/...

 

Doles Army - neutrality lawbreakers supported by the U.S.:

 

Hawaii holomua = Progress. [volume] (Honolulu) 1893-1895, June 04, 1894, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82016410/1894-06-04/ed-1/...

 

The missionaries belonged to the Church  of the holy hypocrites:

 

Hawaii holomua = Progress. [volume] (Honolulu) 1893-1895, June 04, 1894, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82016410/1894-06-04/ed-1/...

 

Research incomplete.

 

aloha.

 



 

references:

Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, January 12, 1915, 3:30 Edition, Page FOUR, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82014682/1915-01-12/ed-2/...

Posted: Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom Introduction Notice ...

https://maoliworld.com › forum › topics › posted-kingd...
Leuren Moret, Vladimir Putin, Karen Hudes, Alayne Fleischmann, and Amelia Gora ... and to insure the entire execution of the articles of the present treaty, ...

  • THE DARK FORCES OF THE ONE WORLD ORDER ...

    https://maoliworld.com › forum › topics › showLastReply
    Sep 22, 2017 — 7) I, Amelia Gora did find the article showing that U.S. President ... Vladimir Putin, Karen Hudes, Alayne Fleischmann, and Amelia Gora.


OPED Articles Posted by Amelia Gora - IOLANI - The Royal ...

http://theiolani.blogspot.com › 2020/11 › oped-articles-...
Nov 6, 2020 — With Credits to Tony Castanha, Wolfram Graetz, Leuren Moret, Vladimir Putin, Karen Hudes, Alayne Fleischmann, and Amelia Gora.

Whistleblowers Info: Exposing One World Order etc.in Hawaii ...

Oct 25, 2015 — World bank Whistleblower Karen Hudes, exposed the fact that the the bankers made a Secret Constitution. This was validated by Vladmir Putin who ...

IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: * Pirate Eyes On Hawaii Series: U.S. ...

Leuren Moret, Vladimir Putin, Karen Hudes, Alayne Fleischmann, and Amelia Gora ... Watch Leuren Moret's videos, and read articles written myself.

Who Has the Hawaiian Kingdom Gold, etc.? - IOLANI - The ...

Dec 6, 2019 — Editors note: This should have been published on December 3rd. but I must have missed the article. ... Karen Hudes is a flak for the World Bank— ...

October 2016 - Kings and Queens of Hawaii

Oct 22, 2016 — 2016-1019a- Expanded Billings for Rents, etc. from Amelia Gora, ... Vladimir Putin, along with Karen Hudes, and Alana Fleischmann are ...

Legal Notice Sent to U.S. President Obama et. als. on January 8 ...

https://theiolani.wordpress.com › 2015/01/09 › legal-notic...
20, 1849/1850 from Amelia Gora, Royal Person, Land Owner, Title Owner, ... Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America, Article XIV.

Exposing Obama........new post - Whistleblower's Website

Jan 10, 2015 — Compiled by Amelia Gora (2014). The following is a compilation of history, genealogies which connects or leads to U.S. President Obama's ...

August 2015 - Tribunal Affairs

Amelia Gora kill hawaiian day also occurred as well as pulling n cutting out tongues ... Karen HudesVladimir Putin, Alayne Fleischmann, David Wynn Miller, ...
 

 

Views: 15


 Repost:

Saturday, January 29, 2022

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Untwisting the International Law Version of the Overthrow in 1893 by the U.S.

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Untwisting the International Law Version of the Overthrow  in 1893 by the U.S. 


                                                                           Review by Amelia Gora (2022)


 The international Law Version of the Overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893 by the U.S.reviewed by Keanu Sai, P.D/ also known as David Keanu Sai details a twisted explanation detailing a supposed legal explanation  on the National Education Associations website article.

Facts Checked 

Sai erroneously concludes that there was no friendship treaty and follows the writings of  Judge Crawford in his book The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed., 2006). 

Note: 

The Treaty between the Kingdom  of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom  and the United States shows  who  the players are.

Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli, his heirs and successors and U.S. President Zachary Taylor are parties to the Treaty ratified in 1850. 


Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States - A perpetual friendship/peace and amity Treaty ratified by U.S. President Zachary Taylor,   U.S. Congress and Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli in 1850


The Treaty exists but Sais detailed article combining international law documents otherwise:

 Despite the unprecedented prolonged nature of the illegal occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom by the United States, the Hawaiian State, as a subject of international law, is afforded all the protection that international law provides. “Belligerent occupation,” concludes Judge Crawford in his book The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed., 2006), “does not affect the continuity of the State, even where there exists no government claiming to represent the occupied State (p. 34).” Without a treaty of peace, the laws of war and neutrality would continue to apply.


CONCLUSION

Sais failure in showin a treaty of peace leads one to believe that the war and neutrality existed then in 1893 and exists today.

The fact  of the matter is that a disregard for the permanent peace/friendship and amity treaty has existed since 1874 because of the claim that Lot Kamehameha/ Kamehameha V was the last of the Kamehameha's by Sanford B. Dole.

Note:  The move to extinguish Kamehameha IIIs heirs and successors began in 1874 with Sanford B. Doles article showing  the last of the Kamehameha's.  The purpose?  No Kamehameha's means No Treaty players.  The Treaty goes away.  The people are disrespected, etc.

Reference:

 https://maoliworld.com/forum/topics/opposition-to-the-hawaiian-roll-s-etc-sent-to-u-s-president-obama?page=6&commentId=2011971%3AComment%3A469472&x=1#2011971Comment469472


Premeditation/plans to annex Hawaii to the United States were made since 1826.  See article about John Foster who directed the overthrow in 1893.  Foster was the Secretary of State under U.S. President Benjamin Harrison.

The extinguishing of Kamehameha IIIs heirs and successors would mean that there would be no treaty because only Kamehameha IIIs family would be able to continue the Perpetual peace and amity treaty which directly affected the U.S. Constitution of 1787, and the supremacy clause Article 6 - Treaties were the Supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges were bound as well.

Note** - the U.S. became bankrupt in 1865 due to the American Civil War costs and was no longer able to treaty with other nations.

Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli engaged and agreed to a Protectorate by the United States, Great Britain, and France in 1854.

Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli also made a Proclamation of Neutrality in 1854 which was also served to the United States in 1854.

Reference:

Review by Amelia Gora (2021). Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli made a Neutrality Proclamation and Had the Proclamations served to the U.S., Great Britain, ...

Kamehameha IV, Kamehameha V, King Lunalilo, and King Kalakaua maintained a peaceful, neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.

Queen Liliuokalani maintained a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation as well.

U.S. President Cleveland reminded Americans of the Neutrality Laws and how it would be a military exercise or expedition if it was not respected.

Reference:

Reference:


Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli informed all that if the Neutrality Laws were not respected, then the issue would be piracy. 

Also due to the documented premeditations discovered in research, evidence shows that U.S. President Grover Cleveland did give Hawaii back to Queen Liliuokalani, the blatant disregard by U.S. President William McKinley who formed a government under the United States second nation called the American Empire, the U.S. did engage in illegally annexing a independent, neutral, friendly, non-violent sovereign nation and did a 

“ Crime against peace
A crime against peace, in international law, is "planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of wars of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing". Wikipedia 

Note:  Due to documented conspiracies, breaches, Fraud, Piracies, then the U.S. must pay rents, remove toxins, etc. and return all that does  not belong to them.

Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli documented that the U.S. and Great Britain could not own lands in the Hawaiian Kingdom /Kingdom  of Hawaii

Note:  

Both  the timeline   and important events are missing  in the article - for example: 

- U.S. President Cleveland gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, 1894, and 1897 and he left office in 1897;  

- U.S. President Cleveland had the American flag removed in Hawaii then the new U.S. President McKinley ordered the flag to be raised shortly after.  

- The newly elected U.S. President McKinley created two (2) governments and created the Territory of the United States under the American Empire 

- and McKinley started a War with Spain  in 1898.

The timeline is missing in the article and 

- fails to show that U.S. President McKinley failed to follow the U.S. Constitution of 1787 and 

- failed to obtain the U.S. Congress approval for War with Spain until four (4)  days later.


Importantly, piracies were disregarded in the international arena it seems, and lies were allowed.

Research incomplete.


aloha.



Reference:

https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/illegal-overthrow-hawaiian-kingdom-government#:~:text=The%20Hawaiian%20Kingdom%20entered%20into%20three%20treaties%20with%20the%20United,the%20Exchange%20of%20Money%20Orders.

NEA News

The Illegal Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom Government

Published: 04/02/2018

STATUS OF THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

In 2001, the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s arbitral tribunal, in Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom, declared “in the nineteenth century the Hawaiian Kingdom existed as an independent State recognized as such by the United States of America, the United Kingdom and various other States, including by exchanges of diplomatic or consular representatives and the conclusion of treaties.” The terms State and Country are synonymous.

As an independent State, the Hawaiian Kingdom entered into extensive treaty relations with a variety of States establishing diplomatic relations and trade agreements. The Hawaiian Kingdom entered into three treaties with the United States: 1849 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation; 1875 Commercial Treaty of Reciprocity; and 1883 Convention Concerning the Exchange of Money Orders. In 1893 there were only 44 independent and sovereign States, which included the Hawaiian Kingdom, as compared to 197 today.

On January 1, 1882, it joined the Universal Postal Union. Founded in 1874, the UPU was a forerunner of the United Nations as an organization of member States. Today the UPU is presently a specialized agency of the United Nations.

By 1893, the Hawaiian Kingdom maintained over ninety Legations and Consulates throughout the world. In the United States of America, the Hawaiian Kingdom manned a diplomatic post called a legation in Washington, D.C., which served in the same function as an embassy today, and consulates in the cities of New York, San Francisco, Philadelphia, San Diego, Boston, Portland, Port Townsend and Seattle. The United States manned a legation in Honolulu, and consulates in the cities of Honolulu, Hilo, Kahului and Mahukona.

“Traditional international law was based upon a rigid distinction between the state of peace and the state of war (p. 45),” says Judge Greenwood in his article “Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law” in The Handbook of the International Law of Military Occupations (2nd ed., 2008), “Countries were either in a state of peace or a state of war; there was no intermediate state (Id.).” This is also reflected by the fact that the renowned jurist of international law, Professor Lassa Oppenheim, separated his treatise on International Law into two volumes, Vol. I—Peace, and Vol. II—War and Neutrality.

PRESIDENTIAL INVESTIGATION OF THE OVERTHROW OF THE HAWAIIAN GOVERNMENT

On January 16, 1893, United States troops invaded the Hawaiian Kingdom without just cause, which led to a conditional surrender by the Hawaiian Kingdom’s executive monarch, Her Majesty Queen Lili‘uokalani, the following day. Her conditional surrender read:

“I, Liliuokalani, by the grace of God and under the constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom, Queen, do hereby solemnly protest against any and all acts done against myself and the constitutional Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom by certain persons claiming to have established a provisional government of and for this Kingdom.

That I yield to the superior force of the United States of America, whose minister plenipotentiary, His Excellency John L. Stevens, has caused United States troops to be landed at Honolulu and declared that he would support the said provisional government.

Now, to avoid any collision of armed forces and perhaps the loss of life, I do, under this protest, and impelled by said force, yield my authority until such time as the Government of the United States shall, upon the facts being presented to it, undo the action of its representatives and reinstate me in the authority which I claim as the constitutional sovereign of the Hawaiian Islands.”

Executive Council of the Provisional Government (The Bishop Museum)

In response to the Queen’s conditional surrender of her authority, President Grover Cleveland initiated an investigation on March 11, 1893, with the appointment of Special Commissioner James Blount whose duty was to “investigate and fully report to the President all the facts [he] can learn respecting the condition of affairs in the Hawaiian Islands, the causes of the revolution by which the Queen’s Government was overthrown, the sentiment of the people toward existing authority, and, in general, all that can fully enlighten the President touching the subjects of [his] mission (p. 1185).” After arriving in the Hawaiian Islands, he began his investigation on April 1, and by July 17, the fact-finding investigation was complete with a final report. Secretary of State Walter Gresham was receiving periodic reports from Special Commissioner Blount and was preparing a final report to the President.

On October 18, 1893, Secretary of State Gresham reported to the President, the “Provisional Government was established by the action of the American minister and the presence of the troops landed from the Boston, and its continued existence is due to the belief of the Hawaiians that if they made an effort to overthrow it, they would encounter the armed forces of the United States.” He further stated that the “Government of Hawaii surrendered its authority under a threat of war, until such time only as the Government of the United States, upon the facts being presented to it, should reinstate the constitutional sovereign, and the Provisional Government was created ‘to exist until terms of union with the United States of America have been negotiated and agreed upon (p. 462).’” Gresham then concluded, “Should not the great wrong done to a feeble but independent State by an abuse of the authority of the United States be undone by restoring the legitimate government? Anything short of that will not, I respectfully submit, satisfy the demands of justice (p. 463).”

INVESTIGATION CONCLUDES UNITED STATES COMMITTED ACTS OF WAR AGAINST THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM

One month later, on December 18, 1893, the President proclaimed by manifesto, in a message to the United States Congress, the circumstances for committing acts of war against the Hawaiian Kingdom that transformed a state of peace to a state of war on January 16, 1893. Black’s Law Dictionary defines a war manifesto as a “formal declaration, promulgated…by the executive authority of a state or nation, proclaiming its reasons and motives for…war.” And according to Professor Oppenheim in his seminal publication, International Law, vol. 2 (1906), a “war manifesto may…follow…the actual commencement of war through a hostile act of force (p. 104).”

Addressing the unauthorized landing of United States troops in the capital city of the Hawaiian Kingdom, President Cleveland stated, “on the 16th day of January, 1893, between four and five o’clock in the afternoon, a detachment of marines from the United States steamer Boston, with two pieces of artillery, landed at Honolulu. The men, upwards of 160 in all, were supplied with double cartridge belts filled with ammunition and with haversacks and canteens, and were accompanied by a hospital corps with stretchers and medical supplies (p. 451).”

President Cleveland ascertained that this “military demonstration upon the soil of Honolulu was of itself an act of war, unless made either with the consent of the Government of Hawaii or for the bona fide purpose of protecting the imperiled lives and property of citizens of the United States. But there is no pretense of any such consent on the part of the Government of the Queen, which at that time was undisputed and was both the de facto and the de jure government. In point of fact the existing government instead of requesting the presence of an armed force protested against it (p. 451).” He then stated, “a candid and thorough examination of the facts will force the conviction that the provisional government owes its existence to an armed invasion by the United States (p. 454).”

“War begins,” says Professor Wright in his article “Changes in the Conception of War,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 18 (1924), “when any state of the world manifests its intention to make war by some overt act, which may take the form of an act of war (p. 758).” According to Professor Hall in his book International Law (4th ed., 1895), the “date of the commencement of a war can be perfectly defined by the first act of hostility (p. 391).”

The President also determined that when “our Minister recognized the provisional government the only basis upon which it rested was the fact that the Committee of Safety had in the manner above stated declared it to exist. It was neither a government de facto nor de jure (p. 453).” He unequivocally referred to members of the so-called Provisional Government as insurgents, whereby he stated, and “if the Queen could have dealt with the insurgents alone her course would have been plain and the result unmistakable. But the United States had allied itself with her enemies, had recognized them as the true Government of Hawaii, and had put her and her adherents in the position of opposition against lawful authority. She knew that she could not withstand the power of the United States, but she believed that she might safely trust to its justice.” He then concluded that by “an act of war, committed with the participation of a diplomatic representative of the United States and without authority of Congress, the Government of a feeble but friendly and confiding people has been overthrown (p. 453).”

In August 1898, the Hawaiian flag was lowered from Iolani Palace and replaced by the flag of the United States of America.

“Act of hostility unless it be done in the urgency of self-preservation or by way of reprisals,” according to Hall, “is in itself a full declaration of intent [to wage war] (p. 391).” According to Professor Wright in his article “When does War Exist,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 26(2) (1932), “the moment legal war begins…statutes of limitation cease to operate (p. 363).” He also states that war “in the legal sense means a period of time during which the extraordinary laws of war and neutrality have superseded the normal law of peace in the relations of states (Id.).”

Unbeknownst to the President at the time he delivered his message to the Congress, a settlement, through executive mediation, was reached between the Queen and United States Minister Albert Willis in Honolulu. The agreement of restoration, however, was never implemented. Nevertheless, President Cleveland’s manifesto was a political determination under international law of the existence of a state of war, of which there is no treaty of peace. More importantly, the President’s manifesto is paramount and serves as actual notice to all States of the conduct and course of action of the United States. These actions led to the unlawful overthrow of the government of an independent and sovereign State. When the United States commits acts of hostilities, the President, says Associate Justice Sutherland in his book Constitutional Power and World Affairs (1919), “possesses sole authority, and is charged with sole responsibility, and Congress is excluded from any direct interference (p. 75).”

According to Representative Marshall, before later became Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, in his speech in the House of Representatives in 1800, the “president is the sole organ of the nation in its external relations, and its sole representative with foreign nations. Of consequence, the demand of a foreign nation can only be made of him (Annals of Congress, vol. 10, p. 613).” Professor Wright in his book The Control of American Foreign Relations (1922), goes further and explains that foreign States “have accepted the President’s interpretation of the responsibilities [under international law] as the voice of the nation and the United States has acquiesced (p. 25).”

Despite the unprecedented prolonged nature of the illegal occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom by the United States, the Hawaiian State, as a subject of international law, is afforded all the protection that international law provides. “Belligerent occupation,” concludes Judge Crawford in his book The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed., 2006), “does not affect the continuity of the State, even where there exists no government claiming to represent the occupied State (p. 34).” Without a treaty of peace, the laws of war and neutrality would continue to apply.”


Timeline from 1800 trou 


International Law Discussions


1800 - Representative Marshall:  


“According to Representative Marshall, before later became Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, in his speech in the House of Representatives in 1800, the “president is the sole organ of the nation in its external relations, and its sole representative with foreign nations. Of consequence, the demand of a foreign nation can only be made of him (Annals of Congress, vol. 10, p. 613).” ”


1906 - “And according to Professor Oppenheim in his seminal publication, International Law, vol. 2 (1906), a “war manifesto may…follow…the actual commencement of war through a hostile act of force (p. 104).” ”


1919 - Constitutional Power and World Affairs by Associate Justice Sutherland:


“Unbeknownst to the President at the time he delivered his message to the Congress, a settlement, through executive mediation, was reached between the Queen and United States Minister Albert Willis in Honolulu. The agreement of restoration, however, was never implemented. Nevertheless, President Cleveland’s manifesto was a political determination under international law of the existence of a state of war, of which there is no treaty of peace. More importantly, the President’s manifesto is paramount and serves as actual notice to all States of the conduct and course of action of the United States. These actions led to the unlawful overthrow of the government of an independent and sovereign State. When the United States commits acts of hostilities, the President, says Associate Justice Sutherland in his book Constitutional Power and World Affairs (1919), “possesses sole authority, and is charged with sole responsibility, and Congress is excluded from any direct interference (p. 75).”


1922 - The Control of American Foreign Relations by Professor Writ



2006 -  “ “Belligerent occupation,” concludes Judge Crawford in his book The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed., 2006), “does not affect the continuity of the State, even where there exists no government claiming to represent the occupied State (p. 34).” Without a treaty of peace, the laws of war and neutrality would continue to apply. ”


Iolani Title.png



   

The Legitimate government in Hawaii Series:  Review of the Infiltration of the Constitutional Monarchy government in Hawaii


                                                                        Review by Amelia Gora (2022) 

Notice how many are eager to celebrate the 1893, January 17 date of the wrongful  Overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani?

In actuality everyone should look at it as a time when the U.S. became documented Pirates in the world.

The real celebration to be had is  the   Facts Found /the Truth leading to the wrongful,   planned, premeditated overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani!

A Concert of Pirates Plans

The following   are facts found which shows that there was No Annexation,   Hawaii was given back to Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, 1894, and 1897 by U.S. President rover Cleveland who recognized that the Royal government is the Legitimate government in Hawaii.

Some of the most important articles are:

1822 - Secret Treaty of Verona - which shows the moves by nations in collusion who looked to break down Monarchy governments world wide which included Austria, France, Prussia, Russia, reat Britain, the Vatican, and the United States.




1840 -  The Kingdom  of Hawaiis Monarchy government became a Constitutional Monarchy when Kamehameha III   signed a Constitution.

1841 - Belgium was the first to recognize the Kingdom  of Hawaii.

1844 - An Agent for the United States claimed to have been the first to recognize the Kingdom  of Hawaii which was printed in the newspapers.

1845 - Kamehameha III had a retraction printed denying that the U.S. was over other nations in recognizing Hawaii and had a reprint made showing that Great Britain was also in a like place.

1850 - A Permanent   Treaty of Amity and Friendship was signed and ratified by both the Kingdom  of Hawaii and the United States President Zachary Taylor.

1852 - A Constitution was signed which included the anti-slavery law.  

Note:  the United States signed into law an anti-slavery law which was worded similarly to the law documented in the Kingdom  of Hawaii thirteen years later or in 1865.


 1854 - A Proclamation of Neutrality was made and signed by Kamehameha III, and served to the United States and many other nations.

Reference:
Review by Amelia Gora (2021). Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli made a Neutrality Proclamation and Had the Proclamations served to the U.S., Great Britain, ...

1854 --  A Protectorate was agreed to by the United States, Great Britain, and France over the Kingdom  of Hawaii.

1864 - A Constitution was signed by Kamehameha  V.
Note:  It Abrogated the 1852 Constitution which included the anti-slavery law.
Definitions. To formally annul or repeal a law through an act of the legislature, constitutional authority, or custom. In contract and insurance law, it is to rescind or terminate a contract.

Important note:  Former American Civil War General Alfred Hartwell selected as a Judge by Kamehameha V, influenced many changes in laws and did participate in the overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893.
 
Reference:

Jan 29, 2017 — researched by Amelia Gora (2017) The following American Civil War Generals were found in the Hawaiian Isl… ... 5) Alfred Hartwell.
Oct 29, 2016 — Background on A.S. Hartwell, a Conspirator: He was an Honorary Brevet Brigadier General working under President Lincoln in the American Civil ...

1887 - A Constitution was signed by King David Kalakaua wo was forced to sign with  a gun to  his head.  The Constitution was prepared by the White Supremacists who stripped the King of his rights.

Note:  King Kalakaua was under duress  which means that the 1887 Constitution was null and void.

1891 -  Queen Liliuokalani took office based on the  White  Supremacists 1887 Constitution which shhad called the Bayonnet Constitution.

Note:  The Queen attempted to remove the Constitution by having the 1864 Constitution re-entered into the government laws.

Extra Note:  King David Kalakauas Constitution was signed under duress which made the Constitution that he signed a fraud and illegal document.  Queen Liliuokalani too was under duress makinthe 1887 Constitution illegal.

1892 -  Benjamin Tracy of the U.S. Navy met wit Samuel Andrews relative of Lorrin Thurston in Makua Valley, Oahu, and helped to plan the overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani.

Other activities/groups were getting ready to overthrow  the Queen and through research has been recorded.  See articles posted in the IOLANI - the Royal Hawk for other important information.  see: http://theiolani.blogspot.com/

John Foster, Secretary of State under U.S. President Benjamin Harrison directed the overthrow  of Queen Liliuokalani.  See article about John Foster:

Jan 5, 2021 — PLUNDERING UPON THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM/KINGDOM OF HAWAII SINCE THE MISSIONARIES/ MERCENARIES ARRIVAL IN 1820 …
Read John Foster's article....a whistleblower out of history documents. ... Amelia Gora Reference: John Foster, he helped direct the overthrow article --an ...
Feb 23, 2020 — The constitution was enacted on October 8, 1840, by King Kamehameha III and Kekāuluohi as Kuhina Nui, an office similar to .
Prime Minister or ...
Conspiracies Planned, Set, and Moves Made

The stage was set for the White Supremacists and their planned organizations to shoot, kill, hang, guillotine, drown, scalp, turn into slaves, beat up, kill, treat inhumanely, etc. those who did not help to overthrow  the Queen in 1893.

Reference:

Feb 18, 2020 — posted by Amelia Gora (2020) ... Yes, the Hawaiian Kingdom's history includes killing, enslaving, imprisoning, ... 153) Oxnard, Henry T.

Masons, Freemasons arrived in Hawaii a few weeks before the overthrow, and a parade to celebrate their city called Honolulu, Oahu.

Note:  Masons, Freemasons were operatives who arrived in Hawaii to assist in overtrowing a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.  They arrived from various nations and operated in concert with the Sharpshooter's, the Army in Hawaii, missionaries/mercenaries, Portuguese community, Punahou schools administrators and students, and Kamehameha Schools administrators and students.

Reference:

1893 - The BOSTON warship was given orders on January 9 to enter Honolulu to assist in protecting the lives and safety of Americans.

1893 - Queen Liliuokalani was overthrown by White Supremacists whhad wanted Hawaii since 1826.  

The U.S. was bankrupt and nearly out of gold.  A U.S. Representative had asked for loans and were denied during King Kalakauas time.


The American Civil War had rendered the U.S. government, Great Britain bankrupt due to the costs of War.  Funding was gotten from the Bank of England, etc. and loans were due.

Queen Liliuokalani destroyed the new Constitution that she introduced,...it was actually   th1864 Constitution rewritten.

1893, 1894, 1897 - U.S. President Grover Cleveland gave Hawaii back to Queen Liliuokalani.

U.S. President Grover Cleveland did remind Americans of the Neutrality laws which was basically ignored by men who failed to follow rule of law, international laws, and acted as Pirates against a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.

U.S. President William McKinley

Failed to follow the U.S. Constitution of 1787, the Hawaiian Constitution of 1864 - the 1887 Constitution was made by the White Supremacists and forced on King David Kalakaua, and Queen Liliuokalani which was illegal.


The Kamehameha Dynasty Continued

King David Kalakaua and Queen Liliuokalani were part of the Kamehameha Dynasty:  

Their mother Keohokalole was a hanai/adopted daughter  of a Kamehameha descendant named Nahuina, child of hanuna son of Kaoleioku, the Oldest son of Kamehameha with Kanekapolei.  hanuna was the brother of Pauahi, mother of Ruth Keelikolani, brother of Konia, the mother of Bernice Pauahi who married one of thheads of the overthrow  conspirators named Charles Reed Bishop, banker, and Pirate of the Pacific.

Bernice Pauahi Bishop was also the stepsister of Kalola, Kaluaikau, Alapai, Abigail Maheha et. als  her hanai/adopted sister was Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani.

Note:  Queen Liliuokalani was a party to the 1850 Treaty of Amity, and Friendship with the United States.  She too was an heir, and a successor of Kamehameha III.

Queen Liliuokalani was also a party to the Neutrality Law of 1854 which  was signed by Kamehameha III.

Note:  Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution documents that Treaties are the supreme law of the land and Judges are to also adhere to that as well.

Extra Note:  U.S. President McKinley, et. als. failed to follow the rules of law which included the U.S. Constitution as well.

1897   - Opposition to Annexation was made by Queen Liliuokalani and 40,000 of her subjects.

1898 - U.S. President William McKinley created another nation for the U.S. called the American Empire and placed Territories that had no Treaties on that list.

Reference:
Peacock vs. Republic of Hawaii, Hawaiian reports, Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.  

McKinley had the Army, Navy, and other personnel develop the Territory of the United States then had it called the Territory of Hawaii. 

The United States maintained the second nation which operated with nations that had treaties intact.

Note:  McKinley disregarded the Kingdom  of Hawaii as having an active Treaty with the United States.  It was Sanford B. Dole who wrote an article claiming that Kamehameha V was the last of the Kamehameha's in 1874.  Later the claims were also made for Bernice Pauahi Bishop, then   Ruth Keelikolani.

Also note:  By claiming the last of the Kamehameha's, the Treaty of 1850 would not be in effect.  But wrong, the Kamehameha's  existed then and their descendants exist  even today.  The treaty is a permanent friendship and amity treaty.

1959 - U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed an executive order making the Territory of Hawaii - created by the U.S. which was under the American Empire, and made it a State with a shared sovereignty or 1/50 interest in the sovereignty of the United States.

Note:  The Kingdom  of Hawaii /Hawaiian Kingdom  as full sovereignty and remains a separate, independent nation which never went away.  

1969 - An article appeared about the SEIZURE of Hawaii which shows that there was NO ANNEXATION.

2000 - The U.S. Justice Department had an article showing that Hawaii was not legally annexed by the U.S.

2015 - Law School head and Law Professor Williamson Chang researched the moves towards Annexation and found that it is not possible for the U.S.(or any nation) to Annex another sovereign nation.

See:  
Feb 16, 2015 — by Amelia Gora (2015) ... see the article "Thirty Days of Hawaiian History" from the PACIFIC ... OHA 29th #3 with Williamson B C Chang.
2018 - United Nations Dr. Alfred deZayas recognized that the Kingdom  of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom  exists and the U.S. is indeed an occupier meaning there was NO ANNEXATION!

Reference
May 10, 2019 — Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter, and the First Letter to Routhe Bolomet Validating the Existence of the ... posted by Amelia Gora (2019).

SUMMARY 

The Kingdom  of Hawaii /Hawaiian Kingdom  exists wit full sovereignty.   
 
The State of Hawaii as a 1/50 sovereignty for bein a created part of the United States with
 the criminal efforts of U.S. President William McKinley who failed to follow rule of law, disregarded the Kamehameha's existence, failed to follow the Neutrality Laws, International laws, failed to respect the Treaty signed by U.S. President Zachary Taylor and supported the genocide activities against kanaka maoli who remain a neutral, friendly, non-violent operating nation.  

The Kingdom  of Hawaii /Hawaiian Kingdom  exists with Full Sovereignty - 100% vs. a Pirate created entity called the State  of Hawaii with 1/50% sovereignty shared with 49 other States which makes up the United States or full sovereignty equal to the Kingdom  of Hawaii/ Hawaiian Kingdom.

Apologies were not accepted by the Royal Family which was an apology Public Law/ P.L. 103-150  from U.S. President William Clinton in 1993.

U.S. Senators Akaka and Daniel Inouye represented the Pirate created 1/50% for the occupying  entity called the State of Hawaii..

Our Constitutional Monarchy government continues on as well as our Royal Family, descendants and heirs of Kamehameha who ruled as the Kin in 1810 with knowledge that the U.S. wanted to Annex us since 1826 as documented by John Foster, Secretary of State under U.S. Benjamin Harrison in 1893.

Kamehameha lll through Queen Liliuokalani and our Royal Family today maintains a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.

Rents are due, and our Kingdom  of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdoms records needs to be returned, etc..

aloha.



References:

Correction: Our Royal Families - Part 3


OUR ROYAL FAMILIES - Part 3 or Corrected Version: Introducing the Crown Land, etc. Owners: The Royal Families/ Kamehameha's: Some of the Descendants/Heirs Found in Research by Amelia Gora (2015)


OUR ROYAL FAMILIES - Part 3
In the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii/
Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/He Mokupuni Pae Aina o Hawaii/Hawaiian
Islands/ Hawaiian archipelago/Hawaii or

Corrected Version:  Introducing the Crown Land, etc. Owners: The Royal Families/ Kamehameha's: Some of the Descendants/Heirs Found in Research by Amelia Gora (2015)

  •  

Corrected Version:  Introducing the Crown Land, etc. Owners:  The Royal Families/Kamehameha's: Some of the Descendants/Heirs Found in Research
                                                                                  by Amelia Gora (2015)
The following are some of the Descendants/Heirs of Kamehameha Found in Research.  
Introducing the Royal Families who are the Crown Land, etc. Owners who are not subject to the laws, have sovereignty, maintain all non-treasonous persons/kanaka maoli and subjects of the Hawaiian Kingdom, and maintaining the 1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America, Treaty with Japan, Treaty with the Netherlands, Convention with Portugal, Convention with Russia, Treaty with Spain, Treaty with Sweden and Norway, Treaty with the Swiss Confederation, Postal Convention with Tahiti, etc.:
Kamehameha's Family/Bloodlines/Heirs/Children/Descendants:
1)  Kaoleioku - his four (4) children were:  Pauahi (w); Hanuna/Hanuno (k); Keola (k) and Konia (w)
2)  Kanekapolei (2) - her children were:  Kikau (k); u.i. others/research incomplete
3)  Kahiwa Kanekapolei - her children were:  Kepelino (k); u.i. others/research incomplete
4)  Keliiokahekili (w) - her children were: u.i. others/research incomplete
5)  Liholiho/Kamehameha II - research incomplete
6)  Kauikeaouli/Kamehameha III - his children were 10:  Keawe 1(k); Keawe 2 (k); Opunui (k); Kekipi;                          Keawe; Mahoe (w); Kahalaoa; Papa; Nalimu; and Albert Kunuiakea.  His hanai                                            hookama/ adopted and inherited sovereignty:  Alexander Liholiho/Kamehameha IV;                                 Hueu Davis, Kale Davis (w), and Peke Davis (w)
7) Nahienaena (w) - her u.i. child/research incomplete
8) Kamamalu (w) - married Liholiho/Kamehameha II her step brother - no children
9)  Kinau (w) - married Liholiho/Kamehameha II her step brother - no children
10)  Kinau (k) - his children were:  Miriam Kekauonohi/Kekauonohi (w); Maulili (k); and                      
                        Keliikanakaole/Kanakaole (k)
11)  Kalanihelemaiiluna Paki (k) - his children were:  Kalaniulumoku (k) and Abner Paki (k)
12)  Kahalaia (k) - was with Pauahi (w) the mother of Ruth Keelikolani; also married Kekuanaoa (k)
13)  Kapapauai (w) - child u.i. - research incomplete
14)  6 other u.i. siblings of Liholiho/Kamehameha II; Kauikeaouli/Kamehameha III; and
                         Nahienaena  (w) - research incomplete        
Kamehameha's had 19 Children, which includes those being researched.              
 Discussion:
So, the foreigners claimed that Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V was the "last of the Kamehameha's"
In 1874, Sanford B. Dole, a treasonous, conspirator, pillager, pirate did write an article stating that Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V(died in 1872) was the "last of the Kamehameha's".,  see the article "Thirty Days of Hawaiian History" from the PACIFIC  COMMERCIAL ADVERTISER at:  http://theiolani.blogspot.com/2014/05/vol-iv-no-494-wednesday-weekl...
Sanford B. Dole was one of the planners of taking over the King's/Queen's position or the Royal Families genealogies, lands, assets, resources since the 1870's.  
The other planners included Charles Reed Bishop, husband of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, who was a hanai sister/adopted sister of Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, Ruth Keelikolani, et. als.  
Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V died in 1872.
Ruth Keelikolani died in 1883.  
 Ruth Keelikolani was also called "the last of the Kamehameha's" by the foreigners.  She died in 1883.
Ruth Keelikolani died in 1883 and it was claimed to have left all of her lands to Bernice Pauahi Bishop who was also claimed to be "the last of the Kamehameha's" by the foreigners, a lie that was promoted and perpetuated by treasonous, conspirators, pirates, pillagers named Sanford B. Dole, Charles Reed Bishop and Friends, et. als.
  
The Truth:
Kamehameha had a total of 19+ children.
Royal Families are Not subject to the laws.  Kamehameha's descendants/heirs existed and were living in Kamehameha's life time.  
Let us review where "the last of the Kamehameha's" Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, Bernice Pauahi Bishop, and Ruth Keelikolani came from:
Kamehameha's  three (3) of his 19 children and their children:
Child #9:                                                         Child #1:                                             Child #11: 
Kinau (w)               ( step siblings)          Kaoleioku (k)                                   Kalanihelemaiiluna Paki (k)
      /                                                                        /                                                                                      /
Moses Kaikioewa                          Pauahi (w) daughter:  Ruth Keelikolani (w) 1) Kalaniulumoku(k)
David Kamehameha                     Hanuna (k) children: Kapule, Kini(w),Hookahi(w),  2) Abner Paki(k)
Lot Kamehameha/                                                   and  Poohina (w)                                          /
  Kamehameha V                      Konia (w) daughter:  Bernice Pauahi (w)     Bernice Pauahi
Alexander Liholiho/                         hanai daughter:  Kaeha/ Makaeha/
   Kamehameha IV                             Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani                         Kalaniulumoku (k) ch:
Victoria Kamamalu                     Keola (k)                                                                               Kalola (w), Alapai(k)
                                                                                                                                                           Kaluaikau(w),
hanai/adopted:  Bernice Pauahi (w)                                                                                  Jane Loeau (w)                                                                                                                                                               Abigail Maheha(w)
                                                                                                                                                           P.F. Koakanu (k)
                                                                                                                                                                et. als.,
step children:  Paalua/Palua/Kapaalua (k) (from Mataio Kekuanaoa's 1st wife - Kalehua)
                            Ruth Keelikolani (w) (from Mataio Kekuanaoa's 2nd wife - Pauahi)
                             John Kapena (k) (from Mataio Kekuanaoa's 5th wife - Kalima/Kalimakuhi/Kamahine)
                             Sam Kapena (k)  (from Mataio Kekuanaoa's 5th wife - Kalima/Kalimakuhi/Kamahine)
                             Umiokalani (w) (from Mataio Kekuanaoa's 5th wife - Kalima/Kalimakuhi/Kamahine)
                             
Note:  Kinau (w) and Pauahi (w) were two of the five (5) widows of Liholiho/Kamehameha II.
1) Mataio Kekuanaoa, House of Nobles member, married  Kalehua - Son:  Paalua/Palua/Kapaalua(k)
2) Mataio Kekuanaoa married Pauahi (w)  - Daughter:  Ruth Keelikolani.  
3)  Mataio Kekuanaoa married Kinau (w) - Children:  Moses; David; Lot/Kamehameha V;
                                                                                  Alexander Liholiho/Kamehameha IV; Victoria Kamamalu;
                                                                                  hanai:  Bernice Pauahi
4)  Mataio Kekuanaoa married Kaloloahilani/Kalolo (w) - no children
5)  Mataio Kekuanaoa married step sister:  Kalima/Kalimakuhi/Kamahine (w) - her children were
                                               John Kapena, Sam Kapena, Umiokalani (w), Alenoho (k), Kapehe (w) et, aks
 Mataio Kekuanaoa had a total of five (5) marriages.
Mataio Kekuanaoa had a Probate disregarding the fact that he was a Permanent member of the House of Nobles, a Sovereign successor through his ancestor Kaumualii.
Mataio Kekuanaoa was part of the Royal Families who are not subject to the laws.
Mataio Kekuanaoa, a successor, a non-Kamehameha descendant/heir of was made heir of a Kamehameha descendant Victoria Kamamalu by the First Circuit Court Judge.
When Mataio Kekuanaoa died, his heir was Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, younger brother of step sister Ruth Keelikolani and hanai sister Bernice Pauahi /Bernice Pauahi Bishop, et. als..
Ruth Keelikolani  who was not the only heir, left her interest to her hanai sister Bernice Pauahi/Bernice Pauahi Bishop.
Problematic Issues
1)  Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, younger brother of step sister Ruth Keelikolani and hanai sister Bernice Pauahi /Bernice Pauahi Bishop were Not the "last of the Kamehameha's".
2)  Kamehameha had a total of 19+ children and the three - Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, younger brother of step sister Ruth Keelikolani and hanai sister Bernice Pauahi /Bernice Pauahi Bishop were from  three (3) out of his 19+ children.
3)  All three (3) were Kamehameha's descendants leaving first cousins existing who were also descendants/heirs of Kamehameha.
4)  All three (3) were Kamehameha's descendants, part of the Royal Families who were Not subject to the laws, as with their siblings/step siblings/cousins who were Kamehameha's descendants/heirs.
5)  They were and remain beneficiaries, reciprocal beneficiaries of all of Kamehameha's lands which includes the Crown Lands, etc.
6)  It was the desire/greed/lust, etc. of the non Royal Families/foreigners/whites/Americans, et., als. to assume Kamehameha's lands since their arrival in the Hawaiian Islands.
7)  The foreigners who made up the third part of the Hawaiian Government, a temporary, voted in position called the House of Representatives helped to dethrone Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, did conspire, premeditate, pirate, pillage lands, estates, trusts, etc. of the Royal Families.
They were treasonous and did belonged to the third part or temporary voted in part of the three-part government.  The permanent parts of the Hawaiian Government was headed by the Sovereign's / Kamehameha's heirs and successors, and the House of Nobles heirs and successors.
It was the treasonous group which dethroned Queen Liliuokalani and acted as the Provisional Government which was backed by the United States.  
The United States of America became the United States and the American Empire as documented in the Peacock vs. Hawaiian Republic case in 1899. ( see HAWAII REPORTS at the Archives, Main Library, or the Supreme Court Law Library,)
Queen Liliuokalani did state that those who dethroned her was an entity, neither de facto nor de jure.  Reason being that the treasonous persons were only part of the voted in, temporary body of a neutral, friendly, non violent nation which was supported by the United States, England, and the bankers - including the J.P. Morgan bankers who were the investors for bankrupt nations United States, and England due to their American Civil War losses, etc.
8)  The foreigners moved on the genealogies, the history, and the legal activities to accommodate themselves but have been discovered through research the criminal undertakings with the intent to defraud, assume, pirate, pillage what is not theirs, does not belong with documented evidence, etc.
9)  The 1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America, Article XIV is applied against all who have pirated, pillaged, against our Royal Families, which includes Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli's heirs/descendants and successors which includes Kalaniopuu's, Kamehameha I's, and Kaumualii's children, step children, hanai children/adopted children, and including the House of Nobles permanent members descendants/heirs documented in articles posted for the Judicial Tribunal evidence, etc.
SUMMARY
The above shows the 19+ heirs of Kamehameha, his children whose descendants/heirs exists today including myself, one of Kamehameha's descendants/heirs from four (4) of his children and  two (2) of his hanai/adopted children.
The above shows the Kamehameha heirs.  The successors list are posted at http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/our-royal-families-part-2 "Our Royal Families Part 2".
All of the above is part of the genealogy, history, legal research which uncovers the treasons, criminal frauds, the mega frauds, pillaging, piracy(ies), racketeering, corruption engaged in by the Americans supported by a bankrupt, corrupt, deviant nation which wrongfully Plundered upon a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation and wrongfully utilized villainous characters to conspire against the true land owners, the true title owners who maintains the 1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America, which recognizes the Constitution of the United States of America even today.
This evidence is also being used for the purposes of the Judicial Tribunal of the Hawaiian Kingdom, etc. and supports the reasons why it is Not O.K. to utilize our Families, our Nations funds for the use of Wars and wrongful Plundering Upon Innocents at our expense, etc.
There are legal reasons why the American Consulate needs to operate here because War crimes have been committed and crimes against our Royal Families, subjects, friends, and supporters is unacceptable.
Maintaining our Royal Families land claims, all kanaka maoli land claims in the Hawaiian Islands/ Hawaiian archipelago/Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/He Mokupuni Pae Aina o Hawaii/Hawaii and aloha.
                                                                  Amelia Gora, one of Kamehameha's descendants/heirs, successors,
                                                                 House of Nobles, Judicial Tribunal, Konohiki, Hawaiian
                                                                 Genealogical Society member - Hawaiian Kingdom
    



fyi...............a reminder, a keeper......

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by TK on April 8, 2008 at 3:45pm
Has anyone refuted or challenged Steven T. Newcomb after the article was published?
Permalink Reply by Yolanda Crisostomo on April 8, 2008 at 4:52pm
Aloha TK,

I don't know.

Yolanda
Permalink Reply by Tane on May 4, 2008 at 6:03pm
The US Supreme Court agrees with this analysis. They questioned Congress' jurisdiction. This was part of our argument decades ago, till today. The Ku'e Petitions are a key document to this argument that demonstrates that the Hawaii Nationals were opposed to it. The few who swore alligience to the Republic of Hawaii did so under duress as a means for employment to sustain themselves and their family. Others, the majority did not because they had their farms and not in the city of Honolulu. Under the Republic, the Hawaii nationals were not allowed to vote save a few who were landowners of a sizeable amount of land. The Republic was in name only and protected by the US military. Their presence in the first 75 days of the invasion was there specifically to protect the Provisional government set up by the US businessmen (Thurston, et al) and the US minister John Levitt Stevens under the guidance and approval of US Secy of State James Blaine and President Harrison. Thereafter, the US presence was more of a show of strength and monitoring what was ongoing to intimidate the people of Hawaii. They were afraid that Japan would step in and restore the Queen to the throne. Countries didn't want to go to war with the USA so kept their distance but watched the turn of events as this was an international concern.
Permalink Reply by Anston Kanehailua on May 4, 2008 at 8:15pm
Brah dis gottah be spread around to all the Hawaiians that don't know what really is going on
Permalink Reply by Tane on December 4, 2008 at 5:09pm
Help spread the word.
Permalink Reply by Amelia Gora 2 seconds ago
Delete
Stephen Newcombs article is an important one................fyi
Keep/Save for your files.............
Professor Williamson Chang's video/information is also very important........
  1. OHA 29th #3 with Williamson B C Chang

    • 8 months ago
    • 493 views
    OHA 29th #3 with Williamson B C Chang.
  2. Professor Williamson Chang Repo Attorney General 09-22-2014

    • 4 months ago
    • 2,994 views
    Press Conference on Letter of Professor Chang to Attorney General Eric Holder, and others, Statement of Professor Williamson ...
  3. Dr Chang Discusses Pu'uhonua Part One

    • 1 year ago
    • 83 views
    September 20, 2013 Dr. Williamson Chang, professor at the UH Manoa school of law talks to a group gathered by Ohana ...
  4. Iolani Palace with Williamson B.C. Chang 1-18-2014

    • 1 year ago
    • 433 views
    Williamson B.C. Chang Professor of Law Degrees AB Princeton University 1972 JD University of California, Berkeley 1975 ...

    1. Kiliwehi Kekumano Nanakuli DOI Testimonies

      • 7 months ago
      • 40 views
      This video is about Kiliwehi Kekumano Nanakuli DOI Testimonies.
    2. Ko Hawaiʻi Polokika-Politics of Hawaiʻi

      • Active 1 week ago
      • 14 videos
      An initiative to create a platform to educate about Hawaii's true political landscape and the Hawaiian Kingdom's continued illegal ...
      • CHANNEL
       
    3. William Aila DOI Nanakuli Testimony... is he lying? I'll let you de...

      • 7 months ago
      • 222 views
      DOI NANAKULI WILLIAM AILA TESTIMONY ON JUNE 24, 2014 @ NANAIKAPONO ELEMENTARY.
    ************************************************

Reminding everyone on the eve of American Holiday for Prince Kuhio, a traitor, a conspirator, PIRATE, supported by Americans and their 50% supporters living on the Crown Lands:
For the purpose of this article, some of the Paid off Hawaiians/kanaka maoli/treasonous/ conspirators, et. als. follows below:
*Prince Kuhio Kalanianaole Kuhio
******************************
Prince Kuhio Kalanianaole Treasonous Person introduced Statehood in 1920https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wMzY0NzE3ZDUtZGE5Mi00Zj...
Prince Kuhio Kalanianaole was not allowed to vote in Congress.....he was only allowed to talk:
Prince Kuhio Kalanianaole claimed Queen Liliuokalani Insane, entity Hawaii Court rules in favor of Treasonous persons Cleghorn, Smith, and Iaukea
Prince Kuhio took an out-of-court settlement to the claim of Queen Liliuokalani's denial that she signed a Trust Deed
see:
articles, posts, researches by Amelia Gora and editor of the
IOLANI - The Royal Hawk news on the web www.theiolani.blogspot.com
yahoogroups.com see hawaiian genealogy society and http://myweb.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037
Note: All the above articles indicate that he was not a supporter of Queen Liliuokalani. Kuhio was also a Mason/Freemason and friends of Charles Reed Bishop and conspirators/pirates of the Hawaiian Kingdom, our Queen, and aboriginal Hawaiians, kanaka maoli, Hawaiian Nationals.
Kanaka maoli were under duress, stress, usurpation, and coercion..........Premeditation to assume a neutral, friendly nation is documented..............what does that mean?  Ramifications ongoing.....
Reference: 

**************************
 
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40983414

******

Exposing Some of the Highlights of Research-Part 2 by Amelia Gora (2014)-Masons in Washington, D.C. and the Hawaiian Islands Affecting the Dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893

The following article shows some of the history of Washington, D.C. and that U.S. President George Washington was a "Grand Master Pro Tempore" of the Masonic Order when they celebrated a cornerstone in 1793......

The Hawaiian star. (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, October 16, 1893, Page 3, Image 3

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015415/1893-10-16/ed-1/s...

Print this image | Download this image

Page  

   

 

In 1892 (days before the criminal dethronement of our Queen, Queen Liliuokalani) a Masonic celebration was held which lay a "cornerstone" and the Masons proclaimed that Hawaii was the "home city of the Masons":

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, December 28, 1892, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1892-12-28/ed-1/s...

Print this image | Download this image

Page

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, December 28, 1892, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1892-12-28/ed-1/s...

Print this image | Download this image

Page  

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, December 28, 1892, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1892-12-28/ed-1/s...

Print this image | Download this image

Page  

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, December 28, 1892, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1892-12-28/ed-1/s...

Print this image | Download this image

Page  

   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGEFc3aVMyM  OLD HUNDRED - song mentioned above  

Note:  Many of the above names have been/will be listed in the Judicial Tribunal list.

In Thomas Allen's book NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY, etc. Allen stated that the Masons were set up to break down Monarchy Governments worldwide................ Conspiracy documented.

See https://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/exposing-some-of-the-highl... for Part 1.


There are many unresolved issues, which reveals that this is truly the CRIMINAL MECCA of the U.S., genocide issues 

 

Informing many because..............

  

Something STINKS...............(.and I know it's NOT ME) WICKED TO THE MAX!

aloha.

Tags: HawaiiHawaiianKingdomcorruptionfraudinparasitespiratespredatorsuncovered

https://maoliworld.com/main/search/search?q=kekauonohi&page=19

https://he-mokupuni-pae-aina-o-hawaii.blogspot.com/2018/04/important-historical-events-keep-for.html?m=0

https://maoliworld.com/forum/topics/the-legitimate-government-in-hawaii-series-more-evidence-of

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  More Evidence of Neutrality Breaches by Usurper Sanford B. Dole under the U.S. Protectorate

 The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  More Evidence of Neutrality Breaches by Usurper Sanford B. Dole under the U.S. Protectorate

 

                                                                        Review by Amelia Gora (2022)
 
 
The following article validates the fact that  usurper Sanford B. Dole was under the Protectorate of the U.S. which also means that the 
 
1)  U.S. breached the permanent friendship/peace and amity treaty, 
2)  the Protectorate Treaty of 1854, 
3)  and the neutrality laws of 1854 
 
The U.S. did breach the Neutrality laws maintained by the awaiian Kingdom /Kingdom  of  awaii since 1854 through 1893 and continuing on even today!

This is the Neutrality Proclamation by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli in 1854:

 

 

This is the 1896 Proclamation by U.S. President Grover Clevelands warning to Americans about the breaches of the Neutrality Law:

 

 

 

Self-Elected President Dole Evidence:

Hawaii holomua = Progress. [volume] (Honolulu) 1893-1895, June 04, 1894, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82016410/1894-06-04/ed-1/...

 

Doles Army - neutrality lawbreakers supported by the U.S.:

 

Hawaii holomua = Progress. [volume] (Honolulu) 1893-1895, June 04, 1894, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82016410/1894-06-04/ed-1/...

 

The missionaries belonged to the Church  of the holy hypocrites:

 

Hawaii holomua = Progress. [volume] (Honolulu) 1893-1895, June 04, 1894, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82016410/1894-06-04/ed-1/...

 

Research incomplete.

 

aloha.

 



 

references:

Honolulu star-bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu, Hawaii]) 1912-2010, January 12, 1915, 3:30 Edition, Page FOUR, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82014682/1915-01-12/ed-2/...

Posted: Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom Introduction Notice ...

https://maoliworld.com › forum › topics › posted-kingd...
Leuren Moret, Vladimir Putin, Karen Hudes, Alayne Fleischmann, and Amelia Gora ... and to insure the entire execution of the articles of the present treaty, ...

  • THE DARK FORCES OF THE ONE WORLD ORDER ...

    https://maoliworld.com › forum › topics › showLastReply
    Sep 22, 2017 — 7) I, Amelia Gora did find the article showing that U.S. President ... Vladimir Putin, Karen Hudes, Alayne Fleischmann, and Amelia Gora.


OPED Articles Posted by Amelia Gora - IOLANI - The Royal ...

http://theiolani.blogspot.com › 2020/11 › oped-articles-...
Nov 6, 2020 — With Credits to Tony Castanha, Wolfram Graetz, Leuren Moret, Vladimir Putin, Karen Hudes, Alayne Fleischmann, and Amelia Gora.

Whistleblowers Info: Exposing One World Order etc.in Hawaii ...

Oct 25, 2015 — World bank Whistleblower Karen Hudes, exposed the fact that the the bankers made a Secret Constitution. This was validated by Vladmir Putin who ...

IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: * Pirate Eyes On Hawaii Series: U.S. ...

Leuren Moret, Vladimir Putin, Karen Hudes, Alayne Fleischmann, and Amelia Gora ... Watch Leuren Moret's videos, and read articles written myself.

Who Has the Hawaiian Kingdom Gold, etc.? - IOLANI - The ...

Dec 6, 2019 — Editors note: This should have been published on December 3rd. but I must have missed the article. ... Karen Hudes is a flak for the World Bank— ...

October 2016 - Kings and Queens of Hawaii

Oct 22, 2016 — 2016-1019a- Expanded Billings for Rents, etc. from Amelia Gora, ... Vladimir Putin, along with Karen Hudes, and Alana Fleischmann are ...

Legal Notice Sent to U.S. President Obama et. als. on January 8 ...

https://theiolani.wordpress.com › 2015/01/09 › legal-notic...
20, 1849/1850 from Amelia Gora, Royal Person, Land Owner, Title Owner, ... Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America, Article XIV.

Exposing Obama........new post - Whistleblower's Website

Jan 10, 2015 — Compiled by Amelia Gora (2014). The following is a compilation of history, genealogies which connects or leads to U.S. President Obama's ...

August 2015 - Tribunal Affairs

Amelia Gora kill hawaiian day also occurred as well as pulling n cutting out tongues ... Karen HudesVladimir Putin, Alayne Fleischmann, David Wynn Miller, ...
 

 

Views: 15




******************

No comments:

Post a Comment