The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: More Piracy Evidence in the Kingdom of Hawaii by the U.S.
- Piracy Evidence -
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
from Facebook:
Alapaki Kim
From my cousin Michael Kumukauoha Lee in response to the US Department of the Interior's attempt to finalise the attempted theft of Hawai‘i.
HAWAIIAN KINGDOM LANDS OF THE GREAT MAHALE ARE WRITTEN IN HAWAIIAN BLOODLINES OF OUR MOKUAUHAU VIA "ANO ALODIAL TITLES:
by Michael Kumukauoha Lee
Hawaii is seized lands neither Queen Lilioukalani nor the Hawaiian kingdom nationals willingly turned over their Allodial interest to their lands to the USA 2 Kue petitions spoke up to stop the Treaty of Annexation and only a lei remains today.
SECOND LIE:
The Newland's Resolution is illegal instrument to cede the Hawaiian Kingdom Crown lands to the USA so says the US Constitution Article 6 Section 2 the supremacy clause it is only the Executive Branch of government that can negotiate a treaty of Annexation for the US not the Legislative Branch.
THIRD LIE:
THE ADMITSSIONS ACT is a fraud.
After World War II the United Nations was created. The UN set-forth the decolonization of all countries under the Empirical powers of other country's.
The occupied Hawaiian Kingdom and the Hawaiian Kingdom nationals including kingdom national descendants not blood Hawaiian's
"Kopae aina's" where to vote in a Pleb-aside to seek inclusion and absorption into the USA or separate self determination.
The US failed to meet the demands of the UN Charter by allowing US citizens who where not the injured party and did not control the Hawaiian lands by Mahele Allodial titles to vote for Statehood and there was not the option two to vote for self determination.
Many Kanaka's boycotted this vote.
There fore the Hawaii vote for Statehood to the USA was a continuing fraud perpetuated not only on the Hawaiian Kingdom nations who never applied for US citizenship but where captured by the USA and given US citizen ship in 1900 to gain control over their Allodial titles going against the US Constitution of the 19th Amendment that you have to apply for US citizenship. another lie .
The so called ADMISSION'S ACT DOCUMENT is a fraud:
Article One Section One is strangely missing.
Why?
Because Article One Section One is suppose to articulate how legally the USA in a legal instrument justifies seizing the Hawaiian Kingdom lands under the UN charter mandate or International law or the US Constitutional law which it can not.
Why?
The USA has no legal instrumentality to claim the Hawaiian Kingdom Lands where legally ceded to the USA.
So Hawaii became a giant TRUST like Bishop Estate.The U.S. became the Board of Trustees and the Hawaiian Kingdom National became beneficiaries of this FAKE STATE TRUST.
This is spelled out in the HAWAII STATE CONSTITUTION ARTICLE ONE SECTION ONE;
"We have the right to makes laws in the State of Hawaii because of the people."
What people?
No one can make laws unless they own said land and only Hawaiian's of the blood still have interest in their family allodial titles see Kumu Mike Lee's Allodial title classes on YOUTUBE.
It is impossible under the "GREAT MAHELE a Foreign Allodial title to transfer the private or Hawaiian Kingdom Crown land in a Allodial title because Hawaii Allodial titles can only be transferred from Grantor to Grantee by having Hawaiian bloodlines in the Hawaiian genealogy.
You must have a living Hawaiian of the blood to be able accept the Allodium and that is impossible if the USA is not a Hawaiian Nation of the Hawaiian blood lines.
YOU HAVE TO HAVE A DROP OF HAWAIIAN BLOOD TO RECEIVE A ANO ALODIAL TITLE UNDER THE GREAT MAHELE.
The interest of Ano Allodial is forever the way the Mahele laws where written and it can not be transferred as if it is fee simple or freehold or fee hold it is superior which Western Authors purposely overlook by quoting US allodial title law which had nothing to do with the HAWAII KINGDOM GOVERNMENT creation of Hawaiian allodial titles what so ever.
The U.S. Federal Supreme Court dealt with Feign Allodial titles not created in the land boundary's of the USA in the US Federal Supreme Court case "Foster and Elam v. Neilson " 27 U.S.. 253 (1829).
This case dealt with lands in Louisiana, New Orleans and the country the land was received from France west of the Mississippi through the treaty of Paris concluded between Great Britain, France, and Spain on February 10, 1763
The case boiled down to this the United States Supreme Court rules that it has no control or possession, or control over FOREIGN ALLODIAL TITLES..
The "Great Mahele is a Foreign Allodial title that the USA has no control or possession of since inception in 1847 and 1848, 1853 by US case president of the US Federal Supreme Court, and US Constitutional law ,and Hawaiian Kingdom law, and the UN Charter and international law.
NO MATTER HOW MUCH LIPSTICK YOU PUT ON A PIG THE PIG IS STILL A PIG AS A LIE IS STILL A LIE THAT THE KINGDOM OF HAWAII WAS LEGALLY UNDER US CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW AND HAWAIIAN KINGDOM LAW CEDE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
"This fact was proved out by the US Justice Department memo in 1988, the U.S, Justice Department issued and advisory to the State Department in which the unconstitutional and illegal nature of the 1898 Newlands Resolution is quite clearly spelled out. The memo explains that the Senate rejected an annexation treaty that had been negotiated by President McKinley with the "Republic of Hawaii."
In an effort to by-pass the treaty process, Sen Newlands of Navada sponsored a joint resolution of annexation. A Senate Foreign Relations Committee report, issued at the time, explained that the resolution relied on the annexation of Texas as a president. The Justice Department memo, however, points out a major difference between Texas and Hawaii,
Because Texas was acquired as a new state, the joint resolution annexing Texas relied on the constitutional power of Congress to admit new states, and was not a proper precedent for annexing a land that would be retained as a possession or territory. In other words, annexation of Hawaii could not be achieved in a constitutional manner by a simple legislative act.
The Hawaiian Islands were foreign soil in 1898, some 2,100 miles beyond U.S, territory, based on the international law principle of extraterritoriality, a U.S. joint resolution to annex Hawaii could not legally extend that far. The 1988 memo fails to identify any provisions in the U.S. Constitution or any principle in the international law which could have provided a legal basis for the United States to acquire Hawaii by a joint resolution.
In fact, the memo says that during the annexation debates Congressman Ball characterized the effort to anex Hawaii by joint resolution as "a deliberate attempt to do unlawfully that which can not be lawfully done,"
article appeared in The Honolulu Advertiser Sunday March 12, 2000 written by:Steven T. Newcomb is Director of Indigenous Law Institute.
The more the U.S. Government and the Fake State Pushes in a illegal act the more the world will see that the phrase," American exceptionalism" is a lie a well. The United States criticized the Russian President for annexing part of the Ukraine illegally but the U.S. has done no difference to the harm and injury that in the "Apology Resolution of 1993" passed by Congress and signed by the U.S. President did not go far enough as the U.S. preaches to Russia to release territory illegally seized the U.S. Government should take it's own advice as well to release Hawaii to its rightful owners the Kingdom of Hawaii and its citizenry the Hawaiian Kingdom National if the US is truly what it says a"exceptional Nation.
aloha.
***********
facebook:
No comments:
Post a Comment