Sunday, May 5, 2024

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: NATO founded by Pirates Documented

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  NATO founded by Pirates Documented


                                                   Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)



Did you know that the NATO/ North Atllantic Treaty Organization was founded by Pirates documented?

 "NATO’s essential and enduring purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of all its members by political and military means. Collective defence is at the heart of the Alliance and creates a spirit of solidarity and cohesion among its members."

"NATO’s goal: peace and security in Europe and North America."

"NATO strives to secure a lasting peace in Europe, based on its member countries’ common values of individual liberty, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. These shared values unite a diverse group of Allies on both sides of the Atlantic, and NATO embodies the transatlantic bond between them, whereby the security of Allies in Europe and North America is inextricably linked. The principle of collective defence – meaning that an attack against one Ally is considered as an attack against all Allies – is at the heart of NATO. This means that no single member country is forced to rely solely on its national capabilities to meet its essential national security objectives. The resulting sense of shared security among NATO members contributes to stability in the Euro-Atlantic area."


Problematic Issues

In the Treaty:

"

Article 10

The Parties may, by unanimous agreement, invite any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area to accede to this Treaty. Any State so invited may become a Party to the Treaty by depositing its instrument of accession with the Government of the United States of America. The Government of the United States of America will inform each of the Parties of the deposit of each such instrument of accession. "


Piracy Status of the United States, Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France


Since 1893, all three (3) Nations, the United States, Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France breached the Neutrality Law of Kamehameha III.

U.S. President Grover Cleveland reminded Americans of the violations of the Neutrality Law passed by Kamehameha III in 1854.


Because the United States promoted and engaged other nations in a unified effort called the NATO - which now has a membership of 32 Nations, it appears that the Nations are and remain unaware of the Pirate Status of the United States, Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France.

It appears that a Pirates Organization/Association has formed because the primary founder is the United States who have failed to inform everyone that they did have a part in plundering upon a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation called the Kingdom of Hawaii and engage in the occupation, piracy(ies) on lands, assets, mineral rights, water rights, and treat the kanaka maoli as lesser citizens because there was no Annexation and lies made over time.  

The very claims made with the NATO organization is not applied to the occupied Nation called the Kingdom of Hawaii of which the U.S. are occupiers and have lied to the people, and others in the World over time.

See:


The NATO organization, therefore, was started by a Pirate Nation forming an organization to protect its Pirate activities in the International arena to gain sympathy for itself and the other Pirate Nations - Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France who have the Pirate Status since 1893 recorded.

Note:

"The United Kingdom (UK) is a country that consists of England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. The name Great Britain refers to the island on which most of the non-sovereign countries of England, Scotland, and Wales are situated. In casual use, the names Great Britain and Britain (and even sometimes England) are often used to refer to the UK even though Northern Ireland isn’t geographically part of the island of Great Britain.."

Reference:

https://www.dictionary.com/e/great-britain-vs-uk-vs-england/


A Pirate Created Organization called NATO


Because NATO was created by the United States, a Pirate status Nation, doesn't that mean all Nations joining the organization also gain the status of Pirates too?


NATO's 75th Anniversary

Antony Blinken, U.S. Secretary of State, spoke in Brussels, Belgium.


NATO's founding member countries were: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom and the United States.

 

- under NATO Shield. 

12 Founding Members:

1)      Belgium - 1949

2)     Denmark - 1949

3)     Canada - 1949

4)     France - 1949   - Under the Pirate status since 1893

5)     Iceland - 1949

6)     Italy - 1949

7)     Luxemburg - 1949

8)    Netherland - 1949

9)    Norway - 1949

10)   Portugal - 1949

11)   United Kingdom - 1949 - Under the Pirate Status since 1893

12)   United States - 1949 - Under the Pirate Status since 1893

13)  Greece - 1952

14)  Turkiye - 1952

15)  Germany - 1955

16)   Spain - 1982

17)   Czechia - 1999

18)   Hungary - 1999

19)   Poland  - 1999

20)   Bulgaria - 2004

21)  Estonia - 2004

22)   Latvia - 2004

23) Lithuania - 2004

24) Romania - 2004

25)  Slovakia - 2004

26) Slovenia -  2004

27)  Albania - 2009

28)  Croatia - 2009

29)   Montenegro - 2017

30)   North Macedonia - 2020

31)   Finland - 2023

32)   Sweden - 2024


SUMMARY


Shall we inform the 29 nations that they have an organization that was started by documented Pirates since 1893?

Shall we inform them that the United States, Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France have had the Pirate status since 1893?

All three (3) Nations breached the Neutrality Law set in place by Kamehameha III from the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1854.

The following shows U.S. President Cleveland's Warning to Americans, followed by Kamehameha III's published Neutrality Law of 1854.  Note that Kamehameha III documented that those Nations that breached the Neutrality Law are Pirates:

1896  - August 26. U.S. President Cleveland: Warned About a Military enterprise or Expedition = Breach of Neutrality 

The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, August 26, 1896, Page 4, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1896-08-26/ed-1/seq-4/

Print this image Download this image

  

Reference:

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: More Evidence, Five (5) More times of the U.S. Breach of the Neutrality Law Totaling 13 Times; The Failed Annexation - Another Perspective Review of the Failed Annexation from Pacific Strife by Kees Van Djik, Amsterdam University Press For Evidence - Review by


A man of true honor protects the unwritten word which binds his conscience more scrupulously, if possible, than he does the bond a breach of which subjects him .

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  The U.S. is in Violation & Breached these Laws


                                                 Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)


The United States of America are occupiers, due to military invasion since 1893.  

There was No Annexation meaning they have No Jurisdiction and are documented occupiers who have supported treasonous persons who were white annexationists/supremacists, the haters of people of color.

They are documented pirates as documented by Kamehameha III in his Neutrality law of 1854.  

Indoctrinating everyone was the plan and through research the following are important evidence of their War Crimes, Genocide, Warring against our Neutral, friendly, non-violent, innocent people since 1893.

The following evidence is for all to know, be aware of because the U.S. is on record along with Great Britain and France in failing to following rule of law, including international laws:


 

The U.S. (and company) is In Violation/Breaches of the following laws:


1) Treaty of 1849 ratified in 1850 - Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America

"There shall be perpetual peace and amity between the United States of America and the King of the Hawaiian Islands, his heirs and successors"

Reference:  http://punawaiola.org/es6/index.html?path=/Collections/Treaties/TreatiesUS1848-1849.pdf

Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation and Extradition, 1849.

On December 20, 1849, the U.S. and the Kingdom of Hawaii signed a Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation and Extradition. The treaty, negotiated by U.S. Secretary of State John M. Clayton and the Hawaiian special Commissioner to the Government of the United States James Jackson Jarves, was signed in Washington, D.C.

Reference:  https://history.state.gov/countries/hawaii#:~:text=Treaty%20of%20Friendship%2C%20Commerce%2C%20and%20Navigation%20and%20Extradition%2C%201849,Secretary%20of%20State%20John%20M.


****************************

2)  Kingdom of Hawaii - Neutrality Law of 1854

  Kamehameha III passed the Neutrality Law:

" Privateering will be charged as Pirates - from Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli:


Polynesian. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu], Hawaii) 1844-1864, November 18, 1854, Page 111, Image 3

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015408/1854-11-18/ed-1/...

Print this image Download this image


The goals of NATO is "common values of individual liberty, democracy, human rights and the rule of law" which is unlike the treatment of Occupied Kingdom of Hawaii since 1893.

Piracy of lands, assets, taxes, mineral rights, and water continues by the developers of the NATO organization who have hidden the truth from the World even today.

It is only right that the NATO organization disband or unify apart from the Pirate Nations:  United States, Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France.


Issues remain unresolved, the occupiers have No Allodial land ownership and continue to plunder upon the kanaka maoli, and others in the Hawaiian Islands by wrongfully charging, and collecting taxes, etc.

The U.S. failed to follow rule of law and violates a peaceful, neutral, non-violent nation. 

It is not O.K. to gain support of other nations and move to plunder upon other innocent nations as well.

Alignment with Pirates is not O.K., unlawful, and illegal.


Note:  The handling of Pirates are unlike the operations of Normal Nations.


Research incomplete.


aloha.

********************

References:

https://iolani-theroyal.blogspot.com/2024/05/neutral-nation-to-neutral-nationsother.html?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3XvRAfbm67rhALAQsOjdxMGnOxHzTNmh5W8F6jGQAZ9ofbzWaVLRNsfQA_aem_ASgHOiz-85I2cfer69tYdaJU05UpTlhxSfLWNNeieDgpMsd_L-tbZ5MdS9k-p1P6PMUx6VfSHkOJTy52KVEorEUe

Neutral Nation to Neutral Nations/Other Nations Legal Directive/Notice No. 2024 - 0502 About the Pirate Nations U.S., Great Britain, and France as documented for Breaching the Neutrality Law of 1854, etc. from Amelia Gora, a Royal Person, a Royal Family Representative, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, etc. - Kingdom of Hawaii

U.S. Laws on Piracy and Privateering/Prosecution of Pirates, etc.

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter81&edition=prelim#:~:text=Whoever%2C%20on%20the%20high%20seas,shall%20be%20imprisoned%20for%20life.

18 USC Ch. 81: PIRACY AND PRIVATEERING
From Title 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDUREPART I—CRIMES

CHAPTER 81—PIRACY AND PRIVATEERING

Sec.
1651.
Piracy under law of nations.
1652.
Citizens as pirates.
1653.
Aliens as pirates.
1654.
Arming or serving on privateers.
1655.
Assault on commander as piracy.
1656.
Conversion or surrender of vessel.
1657.
Corruption of seamen and confederating with pirates.
1658.
Plunder of distressed vessel.
1659.
Attack to plunder vessel.
1660.
Receipt of pirate property.
1661.
Robbery ashore.

        

Historical and Revision Notes

In the light of far-reaching developments in the field of international law and foreign relations, the law of piracy is deemed to require a fundamental reconsideration and complete restatement, perhaps resulting in drastic changes by way of modification and expansion. Such a task may be regarded as beyond the scope of this project. The present revision is, therefore, confined to the making of some obvious and patent corrections. It is recommended, however, that at some opportune time in the near future, the subject of piracy be entirely reconsidered and the law bearing on it modified and restated in accordance with the needs of the times.

§1651. Piracy under law of nations

Whoever, on the high seas, commits the crime of piracy as defined by the law of nations, and is afterwards brought into or found in the United States, shall be imprisoned for life.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §481 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §290, 35 Stat. 1145).

§1652. Citizens as pirates

Whoever, being a citizen of the United States, commits any murder or robbery, or any act of hostility against the United States, or against any citizen thereof, on the high seas, under color of any commission from any foreign prince, or state, or on pretense of authority from any person, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §495 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §304, 35 Stat. 1147).

Words "Notwithstanding the pretense of such authority," were omitted as surplusage.

§1653. Aliens as pirates

Whoever, being a citizen or subject of any foreign state, is found and taken on the sea making war upon the United States, or cruising against the vessels and property thereof, or of the citizens of the same, contrary to the provisions of any treaty existing between the United States and the state of which the offender is a citizen or subject, when by such treaty such acts are declared to be piracy, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §496 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §305, 35 Stat. 1147.)

Minor change was made in phraseology.

§1654. Arming or serving on privateers

Whoever, being a citizen of the United States, without the limits thereof, fits out and arms, or attempts to fit out and arm or is concerned in furnishing, fitting out, or arming any private vessel of war or privateer, with intent that such vessel shall be employed to cruise or commit hostilities upon the citizens of the United States or their property; or

Whoever takes the command of or enters on board of any such vessel with such intent; or

Whoever purchases any interest in any such vessel with a view to share in the profits thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §494 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §303, 35 Stat. 1147).

Reference to persons procuring or aiding was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "principal" in section 2 of this title.

Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.

The last sentence relating to venue was omitted as unnecessary in view of the general provision to the same effect in section 3238 of this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology and arrangement.


Editorial Notes

Amendments

1994Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000" in last par.

§1655. Assault on commander as piracy

Whoever, being a seaman, lays violent hands upon his commander, to hinder and prevent his fighting in defense of his vessel or the goods intrusted to him, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §485 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §294, 35 Stat. 1146).

A minor verbal change was made.

§1656. Conversion or surrender of vessel

Whoever, being a captain or other officer or mariner of a vessel upon the high seas or on any other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, piratically or feloniously runs away with such vessel, or with any goods or merchandise thereof, to the value of $50 or over; or

Whoever yields up such vessel voluntarily to any pirate—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §497 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §306, 35 Stat. 1148).

Minor changes were made in phraseology.


Editorial Notes

Amendments

1994Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000" in last par.

§1657. Corruption of seamen and confederating with pirates

Whoever attempts to corrupt any commander, master, officer, or mariner to yield up or to run away with any vessel, or any goods, wares, or merchandise, or to turn pirate or to go over to or confederate with pirates, or in any wise to trade with any pirate, knowing him to be such; or

Whoever furnishes such pirate with any ammunition, stores, or provisions of any kind; or

Whoever fits out any vessel knowingly and, with a design to trade with, supply, or correspond with any pirate or robber upon the seas; or

Whoever consults, combines, confederates, or corresponds with any pirate or robber upon the seas, knowing him to be guilty of any piracy or robbery; or

Whoever, being a seaman, confines the master of any vessel—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2527(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4877Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §498 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §307, 35 Stat. 1148).

Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.


Editorial Notes

Amendments

1994Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" in last par.

1990Pub. L. 101–647, which directed insertion of "section 11, 12, or 13 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act" after "consideration of any action brought under", could not be executed because the words "consideration of any action brought under" did not appear.

§1658. Plunder of distressed vessel

(a) Whoever plunders, steals, or destroys any money, goods, merchandise, or other effects from or belonging to any vessel in distress, or wrecked, lost, stranded, or cast away, upon the sea, or upon any reef, shoal, bank, or rocks of the sea, or in any other place within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(b) Whoever willfully obstructs the escape of any person endeavoring to save his life from such vessel, or the wreck thereof; or

Whoever holds out or shows any false light, or extinguishes any true light, with intent to bring any vessel sailing upon the sea into danger or distress or shipwreck—

Shall be imprisoned not less than ten years and may be imprisoned for life.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §488 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §297, 35 Stat. 1146).

Mandatory punishment provision in subsection (a) was rephrased in the alternative.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.


Editorial Notes

Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".

§1659. Attack to plunder vessel

Whoever, upon the high seas or other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, by surprise or open force, maliciously attacks or sets upon any vessel belonging to another, with an intent unlawfully to plunder the same, or to despoil any owner thereof of any moneys, goods, or merchandise laden on board thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §489 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §298, 35 Stat. 1147).

Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.


Editorial Notes

Amendments

1994Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".

§1660. Receipt of pirate property

Whoever, without lawful authority, receives or takes into custody any vessel, goods, or other property, feloniously taken by any robber or pirate against the laws of the United States, knowing the same to have been feloniously taken, shall be imprisoned not more than ten years.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §552 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §334, 35 Stat. 1152).

Provision relating to concealment of pirate and words "is an accessory after the fact to such robbery or piracy" were omitted in view of definitive section 3 of this title.

§1661. Robbery ashore

Whoever, being engaged in any piratical cruise or enterprise, or being of the crew of any piratical vessel, lands from such vessel and commits robbery on shore, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §493 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §302, 35 Stat. 1147).

Transposition of several words was made.


https://www.un.org/depts/los/piracy/piracy.htm

Piracy Under International Law

Updated 24 May 2012

Introduction

Acts of piracy threaten maritime security by endangering, in particular, the welfare of seafarers and the security of navigation and commerce. These criminal acts may result in the loss of life, physical harm or hostage-taking of seafarers, significant disruptions to commerce and navigation, financial losses to shipowners, increased insurance premiums and security costs, increased costs to consumers and producers, and damage to the marine environment. Pirate attacks can have widespread ramifications, including preventing humanitarian assistance and increasing the costs of future shipments to the affected areas.

The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides the framework for the repression of piracy under international law, in particular in its articles 100 to 107 and 110. The Security Council has repeatedly reaffirmed “that international law, as reflected in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 (‘The Convention’), sets out the legal framework applicable to combating piracy and armed robbery at sea, as well as other ocean activities” (Security Council resolution 1897 (2009), adopted on 30 November 2009). Article 100 of UNCLOS provides that “[a]ll States shall cooperate to the fullest possible extent in the repression of piracy on the high seas or in any other place outside the jurisdiction of any State.” The General Assembly has also repeatedly encouraged States to cooperate to address piracy and armed robbery at sea in its resolutions on oceans and the law of the sea. For example, in its resolution 64/71 of 4 December 2009, the General Assembly recognized “the crucial role of international cooperation at the global, regional, subregional and bilateral levels in combating, in accordance with international law, threats to maritime security, including piracy”.

The Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, as the secretariat of UNCLOS, has a mandate to provide information and advice on the uniform and consistent application of the provisions of UNCLOS, including those relevant to the repression of piracy. It also has a mandate to provide information on relevant developments in oceans and the law of the sea to the General Assembly, as well as to the Meeting of States Parties to UNCLOS, in the annual reports of the Secretary-General on oceans and the law of the sea. These reports provide updated information on developments in respect of piracy and other crimes at sea.



****************
facebook:

https://iolani-theroyal.blogspot.com/.../the-legitimate... Pirates began NATO.........doesn't that make all of them documented Pirates?
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: NATO founded by Pirates Documented
IOLANI-THEROYAL.BLOGSPOT.COM
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: NATO founded by Pirates Documented
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: NATO founded by Pirates Documented Reviewed ...
1
Like
Comment
Share

No comments:

Post a Comment