The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: U.S. President Cleveland's Hawaiian Policy
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 08 (of 12) by Robert Green Ingersoll
Read now or download (free!)
| Choose how to read this book | Size | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Read online (web) | 1.3 MB | |||||
| EPUB3 (E-readers incl. Send-to-Kindle) | 680 kB | |||||
| EPUB (older E-readers) | 702 kB | |||||
| EPUB (no images, older E-readers) | 554 kB | |||||
| Kindle | 1.0 MB | |||||
| older Kindles | 953 kB | |||||
| Plain Text UTF-8 | 1.2 MB | |||||
| Download HTML (zip) | 632 kB | |||||
| There may be more files related to this item. | ||||||
Similar Books
About this eBook
| Author | Ingersoll, Robert Green, 1833-1899 |
|---|---|
| Title | The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 08 (of 12) Dresden Edition—Interviews |
| Contents | The Bible and a future life -- Mrs. Van Cott, the revivalist -- European trip and greenback question -- The Pre-Millennial Conference -- The solid South and resumption -- The Sunday laws of Pittsburg -- Political and religious -- Politics and Gen. Grant -- Politics, religion and Thomas Paine -- Reply to Chicago critics -- The Republican victory -- Ingersoll and Beecher -- Political -- Religion in politics -- Miracles and immortality -- The political outlook -- Mr. Beecher, Moses and the negro -- Hades, Delaware and Freethought -- A reply to the Rev. Mr. Lansing -- Beaconsfield, Lent and revivals -- Answering the New York ministers -- Guiteau and his crime -- District suffrage -- Funeral of John G. Mills and immortality -- Star route and politics -- The interviewer -- Politics and prohibition -- The Republican defeat in Ohio -- The civil rights bill -- Justice Harlan and the civil rights bill -- Politics and theology -- Morality and immortality -- Politics, Mormonism and Mr. Beecher -- Free trade and Christianity -- The oath question -- Wendell Phillips, Fitz John Porter and Bismarck -- General subjects -- Reply to Kansas City clergy -- Swearing and affirming -- Reply to a Buffalo critic -- Blasphemy -- Politics and British Columbia -- Ingersoll catechised -- Blaine's defeat -- Blaine's defeat -- Plagiarism and politics -- Religious prejudice -- Cleveland and his cabinet -- Religion, prohibition, and Gen. Grant -- Hell or sheol and other subjects -- Interviewing, politics and spiritualism -- My belief -- Some live topics -- The president and senate -- Atheism and citizenship -- The labor question -- Railroads and politics -- Prohibition -- Henry George and labor -- Labor question and socialism -- Henry George and socialism -- Reply to the Rev. B. F. Morse -- Ingersoll on McGlynn -- Trial of the Chicago anarchists -- The stage and the pulpit -- Roscoe Conkling -- The church and the stage -- Protection and free trade -- Labor, and tariff reform -- Cleveland and Thurman -- The Republican platform of 1888 -- James G. Blaine and politics -- The Mills Bill -- Society and its criminals -- Woman's right to divorce -- Secularism -- Summer recreation; Mr. Gladstone -- Prohibition -- Robert Elsmere -- Working girls -- Protection for American actors -- Liberals and Liberalism -- Pope Leo XIII -- The sacredness of the Sabbath -- The West and South -- The Westminster creed and other subjects -- Shakespeare and Bacon -- Growing old gracefully, and Presbyterianism -- Creeds -- The tendency of modern thought -- Woman suffrage, horse racing, and money -- Missionaries -- My belief and unbelief -- Must religion go? -- Word painting and college education -- Personal magnetism and the Sunday question -- Authors -- Inebriety -- Miracles, theosophy and spiritualism -- Tolstoy and literature -- Woman in politics -- Spiritualism -- Plays and players -- Woman -- Strikes, expansion and other subjects -- Sunday a day of pleasure -- The Parliament of Religions -- Cleveland's Hawaiian policy -- Orators and oratory -- Catholicism and protestantism. The Pope, the A. P. A., agnosticism -- Woman and her domain -- Professor Swing -- Senator Sherman and his book -- Reply to the Christian Endeavorers -- Spiritualism -- A little of everything -- Is life worth living; Christian science and politics -- Vivisection -- Divorce -- Music, newspapers, lynching and arbitration -- A visit to Shaw's Garden -- The Venezuelan boundary discussion and the whipping-post -- Colonel Shepard's stage horses -- A reply to the Rev. L. A. Banks -- Cuba; Zola and theosophy -- How to become an orator -- John Russell Young and expansion -- Psychical research and the Bible -- This century's glories -- Capital punishment and the whipping-post -- Expansion and trusts. |
| Credits | Produced by David Widger |
| Language | English |
| LoC Class | BL: Philosophy, Psychology, Religion: Religion: General, Miscellaneous and Atheism |
| Subject | Free thought |
| Category | Text |
| EBook-No. | 38808 |
| Release Date | Feb 9, 2012 |
| Most Recently Updated | Nov 16, 2012 |
| Copyright Status | Public domain in the USA. |
| Downloads | 201 downloads in the last 30 days. |
| Project Gutenberg eBooks are always free! *********************** CLEVELAND'S HAWAIIAN POLICY.Question. Colonel, what do you think about Mr. Cleveland's Hawaiian policy? Answer. I think it exceedingly laughable and a little dishonest —with the further fault that it is wholly unconstitutional. This is not a one-man Government, and while Liliuokalani may be Queen, Cleveland is certainly not a king. The worst thing about the whole matter, as it appears to me, is the bad faith that was shown by Mr. Cleveland—the double-dealing. He sent Mr. Willis as Minister to the Provisional Government and by that act admitted the existence, and the rightful existence, of the Provisional Government of the Sandwich Islands. When Mr. Willis started he gave him two letters. One was addressed to Dole, President of the Provisional Government, in which he addressed Dole as "Great and good friend," and at the close, being a devout Christian, he asked "God to take care of Dole." This was the first letter. The letter of one President to another; of one friend to another. The second letter was addressed to Mr. Willis, in which Mr. Willis was told to upset Dole at the first opportunity and put the deposed Queen back on her throne. This may be diplomacy, but it is no kin to honesty. In my judgment, it is the worst thing connected with the Hawaiian affair. What must "the great and good" Dole think of our great and good President? What must other nations think when they read the two letters and mentally exclaim, "Look upon this and then upon that?" I think Mr. Cleveland has acted arrogantly, foolishly, and unfairly. I am in favor of obtaining the Sandwich Islands—of course by fair means. I favor this policy because I want my country to become a power in the Pacific. All my life I have wanted this country to own the West Indies, the Bermudas, the Bahamas and Barbadoes. They are our islands. They belong to this continent, and for any other nation to take them or claim them was, and is, a piece of impertinence and impudence. So I would like to see the Sandwich Islands annexed to the United States. They are a good way from San Francisco and our Western shore, but they are nearer to us than they are to any other nation. I think they would be of great importance. They would tend to increase the Asiatic trade, and they certainly would be important in case of war. We should have fortifications on those islands that no naval power could take. Some objection has been made on the ground that under our system the people of those islands would have to be represented in Congress. I say yes, represented by a delegate until the islands become a real part of the country, and by that time, there would be several hundred thousand Americans living there, capable of sending over respectable members of Congress. Now, I think that Mr. Cleveland has made a very great mistake. First, I think he was mistaken as to the facts in the Sandwich Islands; second, as to the Constitution of the United States, and thirdly, as to the powers of the President of the United States. Question. In your experience as a lawyer what was the most unique case in which you were ever engaged? Answer. The Star Route trial. Every paper in the country, but one, was against the defence, and that one was a little sheet owned by one of the defendants. I received a note from a man living in a little town in Ohio criticizing me for defending the accused. In reply I wrote that I supposed he was a sensible man and that he, of course, knew what he was talking about when he said the accused were guilty; that the Government needed just such men as he, and that he should come to the trial at once and testify. The man wrote back: "Dear Colonel: I am a —— fool." Question. Will the church and the stage ever work together for the betterment of the world, and what is the province of each? Answer. The church and stage will never work together. The pulpit pretends that fiction is fact. The stage pretends that fiction is fact. The pulpit pretence is dishonest—that of the stage is sincere. The actor is true to art, and honestly pretends to be what he is not. The actor is natural, if he is great, and in this naturalness is his truth and his sincerity. The pulpit is unnatural, and for that reason untrue. The pulpit is for another world, the stage for this. The stage is good because it is natural, because it portrays real and actual life; because "it holds the mirror up to nature." The pulpit is weak because it too often belittles and demeans this life; because it slanders and calumniates the natural and is the enemy of joy. —The Inter-Ocean, Chicago, February 2, 1894. Reference: Project Gutenberg -
The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 08 (of 12) by Robert Green Ingersoll | |
No comments:
Post a Comment