The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The Heirs of the Estate of Charles Kanaina
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
There were nine (9) interests in the Estate of Charles Kanaina, father of King Lunalilo who died in 1877.
The nine (9) interests follows:
1/9 - Pahau(w) and Kaaua
1/9 - Haalelea, A.W. Haalilio, Kahuakailoa, and Kilinahe
2/9 - Bernice Pauahi Bishop
1/9 - Ruth Keelikolani
4/9 - Others
***********
Discussion:
1) The Heirs of Pahau (w) and Kaaua: Their heirs were their descendants or heirs including children, stepchildrn. Kaaua was married to Kalima who had children John Kapena, Sam Kapena, and Kahuakaiola. Her stepchildren were: JWD Paalua, David Kamehameha, Moses Kekuaiwa, Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, Alexander Liholiho/Kamehameha IV, Victoria Kamamalu, hanai: Bernice Pauahi.
2) The Heirs of Haalelea; A.W. Haalilio, Kahuakaiola, and Kilinahe:
Haalelea - had no descendants. His Heirs were A.W. Haalilio, Kahuakaiola, hanai/adopted siblings Victoria Kamamalu, and Kapehe (w) descendants.
3) The Heirs of Bernice Pauahi Bishop:
Kalola (w) her next-of-kin.
4) The Heirs of Ruth Keelikolani
Bernice Pauahi Bishop her next-of-kin.
5-9) Other Heirs of Charles Kanaina.
Note: Charles Kanaina was married to Kekauluohi/Auhea who was married to Kamehameha and Liholiho/Kamehameha II.
They were also the parents of all of Kamehameha's children, stepchildren, hanai/adopted children.
They were also the parents of all of Kamehameha II's stepchildren who \included Kamehameha's children, stepchildren, and hanai/adopted children.
This genealogy fact was not included in the Probate of Charles Kanaina who was the father of King William Lunalilo.
Conspirator's documented
The Judges, Trustees were documented conspirators defrauding many heirs and were documented guilty in the updated cases by the Kingdom of Hawaii Judicial Tribunal, and Supreme Court/ Superior Court Cases of the Legitimate Government in Hawaii's Court of Original Jurisdiction, and not the conspirators/treasonous persons set up to defraud the true heirs.
The conspirators/treasonous persons supported the usurpation of Queen Liliuokalani, and invasion of the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1893.
The invading U.S. Military aided the usurpers under the guidance of U.S. President Benjamin Harrison, the U.S. Congress documented.
Pirate, Occupation Status of the U.S. supported Provisional, Republic, Territory, and State Governments
There was No Annexation which means the U.S. has No Jurisdiction in the Hawaiian Islands.
Ill gotten lands, assets, revenues from entry fees, taxes, mineral rights etc. have been obtained since 1893.
Breaches of the U.S. Constitution, Supremacy Clause, Treaty of 1849 ratified in 1850, the 1854 Protectorate, the Neutrality Law of 1854, and the 1893 Agreement by the Junta/U.S. Junta and Queen Liliuokalani is documented. The U.S. Failure to follow rule of law along with Great Britain, France, etc. is documented.
Many of the Heirs and Successors of Charles Kanaina exists today, including the heirs and successorsd of Kekauluohi/Auhea who was married to Kamehameha, and Kamehameha II.
Treaty issues, etc. remain unresolved.
Rents are due for the 4 million acres + by the U.S. which amounts to $50,000 per acre per month, water usage, minerals, etc.l
Our Kingdom of Hawaii buildings including the IOLANI Palace which was owned by King William Lunalilo and his father being the heir is part of the lands owned by the Heirs and Successors listed above.
Also, the ownership of all government papers, artifacts, etc. are owned by many of the heirs and successors listed above.
Research incomplete.
aloha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOSW0mnri2k&list=RDMMcOSW0mnri2k&start_radio=1
***************
References:
"
Pahau and Kaaua claim
[edit]
Pahau and her husband Kanoelehuaher petitioned the court for administration to the estate based on Pahau's claimed genealogy to Kanaina through Eia, his father, as did Kaaua:
| Makakualii (k) | Kapalaua (w) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kanemano I (k) | Kaikailua (w) | Kekiaokalani (k) | Lihiole | Kalaniookoe (k) | Eia (k) | Kauwa | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kanemano (k) | Kapalani | Eia II (k) | Kapuonohi | Kanaina (k) Decedent | Kekāuluohi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pahau (w) Claimant | Kaaua (k) Claimant | Lunalilo | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Their claims were confirmed by the courts and a distribution of 1/9 of the estate was eventually awarded to them.
Leialoha claim
[edit]Leialoha claimed to be a first cousin of Kanaina on his mother's side through her brother, Keholo, as his daughter.
Kealaina and Kauimakaole
[edit]Kealalaina Meheiwa and Kauimakaole Lazarus filed a petition claiming to be the only issue of Kamoakeawe, a collateral family line from Kana'ina's maternal line.
Kalakaua claim
[edit].jpg)
A petition was filed by King David Kalakaua, Lydia K. Dominis, Archibald Scott Cleghorn and Miriam K. Cleghorn for quiet title by right of inheritance. A hearing was set by Justice Lawrence McCully. The hearing took place on October 17, of 1877 and further hearings continued the rest of the year with another hearing scheduled for January 26, of 1878.[10]
Haalelea, Kahuakaiola, A.W. Haalilio and Kilinahe claim
[edit]In January another petition was made. Levi Haalelea, Kahuakaiola and A.W. Haalilio filed through their representatives, Jno. Lota Kaulukou. Their petition was through a brother (named Keholo) of kanaina's Mother, Kauwa. In July 1878, Justices Harris, Judd and McCully heard an appeal from the king and his two sisters. On August 17, 1878, they handed down their decision. The Justices felt Kalakaua failed to prove his case, on behalf of himself and his siblings however, they were very impressed with the claim of Kilinahe, Kanaina's first cousin whose first petition was declined as being too late to be filed, but permitted during the case's appeal.
They felt that Kilinahe had carried himself in the manner of a chief and that his statements, witnesses and genealogy were very strong. They also found in favor of several others. The court decreed for the estate to go to Haalilio (k), Haalelea (k) and Kahukaiola (k), who were to receive one quarter of the estate. The claim of Pahua (w) was granted one quarter share as well as Kaahua (k) who received the same one quarter amount. Kilinahe died before the adjudication of his claim. The court named his widow and children his heirs and allotted them a one quarter share.[11]
Claimants made petitions to the court under the act of 1874 to quite land titles. The act was later deemed unconstitutional and a new decree of heirship was made. By December 1879 disbursement of land in trust with William Cooper Parke, (Marshal of Hawaii from 1853 to 1884) and owned by heirs, could not be agreed upon for settlement. Most supported the sale of the lands, so an order was made and all land sold at auction.[12]
Final adjudication of probate found eight parties as heirs to the Kana'ina estate with some of lesser relationship. Most of the heirs were descended from Moana and one of her four husbands. The probate records include a great deal of information from the 4 years of litigation. A great number of people petitioned the courts to claim title as heir.[4] Final list of heirs includes Bernice Pauahi Bishop, receiving two - 1/9th shares because her genealogy is derived from two separate people who were half siblings. Ruth Keelikōlani, received a single 1/9th share, as did remaining heirs, Haalilio, Haalelea, Kilinahe[2] and 5 other parties.[13]"
Reference:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Matter_of_the_Estate_of_Charles_Kanaina
*********
facebook:
No comments:
Post a Comment