Friday, November 15, 2019

Vol VII No. 779 Wednesday Weekly November 13, 2019 (Part 2 of 2)

Translate

Powered by Google TranslateTranslate


Wednesday, November 13, 2019


Vol VII No. 779 Wednesday Weekly  November 13, 2019 (Part 2 of 2)

IOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIO

https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/…/royal-familys-la… Land Owners, Next-of-kin to Bernice Pauahi Bishop Step forward claiming our Royal Family's properties......Kanaka maoli, Konohiki/ Royal Family's Konohiki ---important fyi
Comments
Hawaiian Kingdom is the Best Series

U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back 3X to Queen Liliuokalani


  Alodio, Forever Lands Given to Kanaka Maoli and Fee Simple to Aliens 


About the Hawaiian Government - a Constitutional Monarchy Since Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli 

Anti-Slavery Law Passed in the Hawaiian Kingdom 13 Years Before the United States Passed Their Law!

Failed Annexation Off Jstor  - Article from the Amsterdam University - Amsterdam, Netherlands




About the United States:
The following Lies are documented in the 1898 Senate transcript exposed in the article: "Secret debate on U.S. seizure of Hawaii revealed"
(1) U.S. debate on whether to take over Hawaii occurred five (5) years AFTER taking over
Hawaii, a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation in a planned move since 1840.
(2) PEARL HARBOR WAS UNDER LEASE
(3) ANNEXATION OF HAWAII WAS A LIE
(4) WAR WITH SPAIN WAS MADE WITHOUT THE SENATE APPROVAL because War
started/existed "four days earlier"
See:
Comments


IHRAAM Statement: Item 4, General Debate, 17 September 2019



About this website





Like
Comment
Comments
Reminder of Russell Means advice to kanaka maoli:
IOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIO

The Queen Liliuokalani Trust has sold the fee for the ground beneath the Hilton Waikiki Beach hotel for $78 million — its second sale of a Waikiki property this year — as part of the trust’s repositioning of assets to support programs for Native Hawaiian children.



About this website

bizjournals.com
The transaction follows the trust’s recent sale of the land beneath the Alohilani Resort Waikiki Beach for $195 million to Safehold Inc., a real estate investment trust affiliated with iStar Financial.


Comments







  • Amelia Gora This Liliuokalani Trust is a FRAUD.....this trust was based on a trust created by the usurpers of Queen Liliuokalani, the same who were the trustees of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates....William O. Smith et. als…..also, the facts of the matter is that our court of original jurisdiction the Supreme Court of the Hawaiian Kingdom adjudicated the matters in 2018...notice was served in 2018, and again 2019...we have the return receipt for the Certified Mailings..... Hilton Waikiki Beach will have to get their monies back from the criminal deviants because the REAL Trustees of Queen Liliuokalani exists....She had created her trust in 1872 and William O. Smith et. als. had changed an "Agreement" to a "Deed". ; Queen Liliuokalani denied signing a Trust with the usurpers... We stripped all the lands from the FRAUD Trust, and the same goes for the Bernice Pauahi Bishop/KSBE/Kamehameha Schools as well....which means that the current Trustees are illegal and documented criminals! They signed the certified return receipt ….. the Trusts are now in the hands of the True Trustees, our Royal Family's. See: Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Legal Notice No. 2018-0408 First Supreme Court Court Case Heard and Recorded; Supreme Court Judges of the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii have adjudicated the Trustees of the Liliuokalani Trust of 1909 and Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates/KSBE/Kamehameha Schools - Bishop Estates/ Kamehameha Schools Guilty of Fraud, Conspiracy, Piracy, etc. Legal news from the offices of Amelia Gora, a Royal person, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles Member, Judicial Tribunal Judge, one of the four (4) Judges elected by the Sovereigns heirs and successors and the House of Nobles heirs and successors effective March 13, 2018
    Hawaiian Kingdom: Updated Supreme Court Cases to Date 1 ...
    ://he-mokupuni-pae-aina-o-hawaii.blogspot.com/.../supreme...
    Was this helpful?
    Hawaiian Kingdom - System of Government - Supreme Court
    https://www.hawaiiankingdom.org/govt-supreme-court.shtml

    The Hawaiian Kingdom Supreme Court. The judicial power of the Kingdom is vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts as the Legislature may, from time to time, establish. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the land. It is the final court of appeal …
    Hawaiian Kingdom: Updated Supreme Court Cases to Date 1 ...
    https://he-mokupuni-pae-aina-o-hawaii.blogspot.com/...

    Jul 03, 2018 · Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Legal Notice No. 2018-0408 First Supreme Court Court Case Heard and Recorded; Supreme Court Judges of the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii have adjudicated the Trustees of the Liliuokalani Trust of 1909 and Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates/KSBE/Kamehameha Schools - Bishop Estates/ Kamehameha Schools Guilty of Fraud, … questions? hawaiianhistory@gmail.com

    Updated Supreme Court Cases to Date 1 - 42 7/03/2018
    he-mokupuni-pae-aina-o-hawaii.blogspot.com
    Updated Supreme Court Cases to Date 1 - 42 7/03/2018
    Updated Supreme Court Cases to Date 1 - 42 7/03/2018


  • Sudden Rush EA
    youtube.com
    Sudden Rush EA
    Sudden Rush EA


  • Amelia Gora The court of Original Jurisdiction is the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Supreme Court, and not the identity thieves, pirate, pillagers, treasonous persons, conspirators who infiltrated the Judiciary in the Hawaiian Kingdom/ Kingdom of Hawaii aka's.
    Supreme Court of the Hawaiian Kingdom Has the Original ...
    ://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/.../supreme-court-of...
    Supreme Court of the Hawaiian Kingdom Has the Original Jurisdiction Not the Identity Thieves Territory turned State of Hawaii
    iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com
    Supreme Court of the Hawaiian Kingdom Has the Original Jurisdiction Not the…
    Supreme Court of the Hawaiian Kingdom Has the Original Jurisdiction Not the Identity Thieves Territory turned State of Hawaii
    **************
  • Amelia Gora Pirates laws in place? Let's look at the Facts: (1) NO ANNEXATION (2) Opposition to Annexation by Queen Liliuokalani made (3) Queen Liliuokalani's subjects documented oppositions 21,000 persons, and it appears that 19,000 signatures have yet to be found (4) U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, 1894, and 1897 (5) Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli, his heirs and successors, forever are the Crown Lands owners - Private Properties, (6) Government lands are the Hawaiian Kingdom government lands, NOT alien identity thieves entity calling itself the State of Hawaii, a conjured up, fictitious entity based on LIES, an entity which SEIZED the Hawaiian Lands, (7) Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli documented that the Hawaiian Kingdom's House of Nobles are to oversee the government lands and the Hawaiian Kingdom's Minister of Interior is to assign these lands to kanaka maoli under the "rights of native tenants"; (8) all the Alii Trusts are made up of Private Properties belonging to hooilina/heirs and Private Properties with alodio titles; (9) Aliens cannot own alodio titles; (10) disabilities are documented by Kamehameha III who documented that Great Britain and the United States cannot own lands in the Hawaiian Islands (11) Treason documented for the following: Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Charles Reed Bishop, Princess Kaiulani, Albert Kunuiakea, Prince Kuhio, Prince Kawananakoa, Celso Moreno, Alfred S. Hartwell, Robert Wilcox, Boyd, Booth, William O. Smith, Sanford B. Dole, Provisional government cabinet, Charles Montague Cooke, Samuel Mills Damon, Charles McEwen Hyde, Joseph Oliver Carter, William Fessenden Allen, Alfred W. Carter, Eben F. Bishop, Albert F. Judd, William Williamson, Richard Henderson Trent, et.als. - trustees of the Bishop Estate; Archibald S. Cleghorn, Curtis P. Iaukea, Cecil Brown, from the Liliuokalani Fraud Trust created in 1909, et. als. recorded in PIRATES OF THE PACIFIC: Charles Reed Bishop and Friends; (12) Kamehameha's descendants/heirs and successors existed in 1893 and their descendants exists today; (13) descendants/heirs of Kalola (female) the "next-of-kin" of Bernice Pauahi Bishop recorded in Probate existed in 1884 and descendants/heirs exists today; (14) descendants/ heirs of Kekua/Kekualoa/Kahakuhaakoi/Kaaumoana (female) existed in 1893 and their descendants exist today - she was the designated trustee of Kaeha/Kamakaeha/Makaeha/Lydia/Liliuokalani/ became Queen Liliuokalani in 1891 - Kekua/Kekualoa/Kahakuhaakoi/ Kaaumoana was a hanai/adopted daughter of Kaeha who set up her trust in 1872 which is why the Queen denied signing a Trust Deed with William O. Smith et. als. in 1909. Note: William O. Smith et. als. were attorneys who set up the trust of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, planned the overthrow, and set up the Fraud trust for Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani; 15) John Foster, former Secretary of State under U.S. President Benjamin Harrison directed the overthrow of 1893. He divulged that many U.S. Presidents planned the annexation of Hawaii since 1840 or U.S. President Tyler's administration from the time of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli. 16) the claims of the U.S. since the time of U.S. President McKinley is all based on lies because he :"proclaimed" that Hawaii was a "territory" and had the army, navy, and Federal personnel develop the territory, disregarding U.S. President Cleveland's return of Hawaii to Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, 1894, and 1897; 17) the claim to having ownership of Pearl Harbor is a Lie documented; 18) aggressive Wars began with U.S. President McKinley who failed to follow rule of law and the U.S. Constitution and failed to allow Congress to vote to go to war first; 19) University of Hawaii Professor Williamson Chang and former head of the Law School found through research that there was No Annexation/ Illegal to Annex a foreign nation, etc. 20) United Nations Dr. Alfred deZayas documented that the Hawaiian Kingdom exists and is under an illegal occupation, 21) kanaka maoli have rights of protected persons, etc. 22) the Treaty of 1849/1850 between the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America is a permanent friendship and amity treaty which includes Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli, his heirs and successors and U.S. President Zachary Taylor continues on because Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli's heirs and successors existed in 1849/1850 and their descendants exist today 23) application of article XIV of the 1849/1850 treaty can be applied even today. Summary: The Superior, Paramount titles also known as alodio titles are owned by the Kamehameha's who exists today with proof from research, etc. 24) Squatters on Private Properties documented; 25) Liens are documented for Private Properties with alodio titles held by our Royal Family's who are Kamehameha's descendants, and kanaka maoli who were also conveyed alodio titles by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli. 26) the Trespassers are aliens operating as the entity, an illegal government setup called the State of Hawaii with their agencies, City and Counties, and their armies called the National Guard, Police Department, Sheriffs, Department of Land and Natural Resources officers and Courts operating without original jurisdiction. All of the above is true, correct, and verifiable....signed by: Amelia Gora, a Royal person, descendant/heir of Kamehameha, Royal Family's Representative, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles member - Hawaiian Kingdom dated: 10/26/2019 - Saturday - aloha.
  • https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/…/pirates-eyes-on-… Non Owners Alert Holy Smokes... Evidence of Trespassers and It Ain't our Alodio Land Owners!
    8 mins
  • Queen Liliuokalani's Opposition to Annexation to the U.S. found by Kilikina Kekumano



    Beautiful copies of Queen Liliuokalani's Opposition to Annexation to the U.S. found by Kilikina Kekumano

    documentcloud.adobe.com

    Prophesy: Non-Piratical People Will Rule Again!



    * * Prophesy Reminder: Non-"pirates half whites/kanaka maoli will Rule Again



    Prophesy:  Missionary Suckers vs. Non-"piratical" half whites/kanaka maoli Will Rule Again

                                                                                  Researched by Amelia Gora (2018)
    An interesting article appeared on October 27, 1893 or 125 years ago showing a prophesy that is happening now:

    Hawaii holomua = Progress. (Honolulu) 1893-1895, October 27, 1893, Image 3

    Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

    Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82016410/1893-10-27/ed-1/seq-3/


    Page
    Page


    The author of the article who knew statistics showed how the half whites who were Not Pirates/ "Piratical" would return.

    And...……….he was right!

    Me ka Hana Ana or RIGHT ON!

    aloha.







IOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIO

Comments
Royal Tidings No. 2019-1114 Royal Families news on the web - Updated Public Notice: Evidence of Why the State, City & Counties, and U.S are Illegal in the Hawaiian Islands/Archipelago - Keep for your Records!

Royal Tidings No. 2019-1114 Royal Families news on the web - Sharing a Preview of What's to Come...



Royal Tidings No. 2019-1114 ROYAL FAMILIES news on the web 



Updated Public Notice:  Evidence of Why the State, City & Counties, and U.S are Illegal in the Hawaiian Islands/Archipelago - Keep for your Records!

                                                           - Important Review-

                                                                                     posted by Amelia Gora (2019)


The following information is a combination of multiples of posts which basically documents how illegal the entity State, City & Counties, and the U.S. are illegal in the Hawaiian Islands/Archipelago.
This shows how the failure to apply the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution results in conspiracies documented.

U.S. President Cleveland did give back Hawaii to Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, 1894, and 1897.
See more at:  https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/10/us-president-cleveland-rocks-he-gave.html under the heading U.S. President Cleveland Rocks! He Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani 3X ! McKinley Should have been IMPEACHED!

Conspirators, actually a concerted effort by many conspirators including Bernice Pauahi Bishop and her lawyer, banker husband Charles Reed Bishop and Friends supported the many who moved to usurp Queen Liliuokalani in 1893.
See more at:  https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2018/11/in-land-of-poi-treason-by-charles-reed.html under the heading of * Pirate Eyes On Hawaii Series: "IN THE LAND OF POI" Treason by Charles Reed Bishop, his half-white wife, etc. Evidence for all

The following applied to the Evidence of Why the State, City & Counties, and U.S. are legally illegal in the Hawaiian Islands/Hawaiian archipelago based on rule of law and the U.S. Constitution:

1993

1993 - Admission of some of the criminal acts were made and signed into law by U.S. President William Clinton as P.L. 103-150.

International Attorneys documented the wrongs:

 Dr. Boyle http://www.alohaquest.com/archive/boyle_excerpts.htm

The United States of America is "...admitting that the invasion, overthrow, occupation, annexation, starting in 1893, on up, violated all the treaties, violated basic norms of international law, and the United States Constitution... the overthrow of a lawful government... Under international law when you have a violation of treaties of this magnitude, the World Court has ruled that the only appropriate remedy is restitution.""...now the United States government, after one hundred years, has finally and officially conceded, as a matter of United States law, that Native Hawaiian people have the right to restore the Independent Nation State that you had in 1893 when the United States government came and destroyed it. And also then that as a matter of international law the Native Hawaiian people have the right to go out now and certainly proclaim the restoration of that State... this resolution clears up all these matters... You don't need to petition Congress to do it. Congress has given you everything you need right here to do it, if that's what you want to do. The United Nations Charter provides the rest of the authority to do it."
"Congress is effectively conceding now that the (1959 statehood) vote is meaningless, as a matter of international law and United States domestic law. So you're not bound by it. Rather I'm suggesting you're now free to determine your own fate pursuant to the principal of self-determination."
"The State of Hawai'i, the federal government, are... the civilian arms of the military occupation authority, and... do not have sovereign powers. The sovereignty resides in the people."
"Who's land is it? Well, from what Congress seems to be saying, it's the land of the Native Hawaiians. The Native Hawaiian people still have sovereignty... You can't trespass on your own land. The trespassers then become the State of Hawai'i, and the land developers, and the golf courses, and the resorts. You are simply the Native Hawaiians asserting your rights under international law... this reversal of positions, between who is the criminal and who is the victim, who is asserting their rights and who is violating their rights, has been effectively conceded by Congress."
"... these are official findings of fact and law, by the Congress of the United States. These findings bind all state and federal courts here in Hawai'i."
"As a litigator before the International Court of Justice, I would be able to take this law to the World Court, and say, 'The United States government has now officially conceded that it illegally invaded and occupied the Kingdom of Hawai'i, and for this reason the native people of Hawai'i would be entitled to a restoration of their independent status as a sovereign nation state.'"
"I could not predict how long this would take, what would be the consequences, how many states will recognize you, but I take it that the plight of the Hawaiian people is generally well known in the world, and there's a great deal sympathy ...it might be that you would be able to obtain recognition quickly. And especially if you pursue this process in accordance with principals of peaceful, non-violent struggle. And I submit that's the most effective technique you have today... Gandhi threw the mighty British Empire out of India without using force. People power, what we call it today. And I submit that the Native Hawaiian people would be able to do the same thing, moving in this direction and adopting the techniques of peaceful, non-violent action, which is what Gandhi called for."
"I would certainly caution you against trying to seek the same type of treatment that the federal government has doled out to the Native Americans. Moreover, on the basis of this statute, you're entitled to a lot more..."
"...an Independent Sovereign Nation State is one way a people who are threatened with extermination by means of genocide can attempt to protect themselves... What is the best way to protect the existence of your people, as a people? ...to proclaim your own State, and then ultimately seek international recognition and finally UN membership..."
"...it's your future and that of your children and your children's children that is at stake."
What are the Criteria ... How can it be done?
Territory
"First, a fixed territory, and clearly we have the Hawaiian Archipelago... Who's land is it? Well, from what congress seems to be saying, it's the land of the Native Hawaiians. The Native Hawaiian people still have sovereignty. The sovereignty inheres in you. And now it is for you to decide what to do with this sovereignty... the title to the land rested and still rests, under international law, with the Native Hawaiian people."
Population
"Second, a population, a distinguishable population of people, the Native Hawaiians, those who would trace their ancestry back before the appearance of Europeans on these lands... Certainly the Hawaiian state could take the position that you'll set up a procedure to provide citizenship to all people who are habitual residents of the new State of Hawaii as of a certain date... on a level of equality with everyone else."
Government
"Third, a government, and here you have ... the Kupuna (Elders) Council, that you've traditionally had. You don't need a government along the lines of the federal government of the United States or the State of Hawai'i to have a government. Rather what you need is a way to organize your people to govern your relations among each other, and clearly you have that."
International Relations
"And fourth, the capacity to enter into international relations, to deal with other states, and to keep your commitments. As I understand it, there are already states in the Western Pacific region that support the Native Hawaiian people and probably would be prepared to give you diplomatic recognition as an independent state... You would probably obtain recognition in that capacity from a fairly large number of states."
See Full text of Boyle's testimony
1998

 Dr. Matthew Craven

http://www.hawaiiankingdom.org/pdf/Continuity_Hawn_Kingdom.pdf

1998 - In Williamson B. C. Chang's brief in Civ. No. 98-0559-02 (Condemnation) dated July 29, 1998 on page 2 with Affidavit:
" Hawaii and the United States were separate and independent nations prior to July 7 , 1898. This Court may take judicial notice of that fact. No act of Congress, no Act of the Congress of the United States, no act of any Congress in the world can, without more, result in the incorporation of the territory of another nation." 1
1 See Exchange of remarks, Senators Allen and Stewart, 55th Cong. 2 d Session. 31 Cong. Rec. 6369 (Senator Stewart taking the position that the resolution was mere "puffing," in that the United States can "annex the world" if Congress so chose.) No nation has that power and not nation ever will have that power. Equally true, no nation can suffer the loss of its lands by " joint resolution ." It is not simply an illegal act - it is an impossible act. See Statement of Senator Foraker admitting Joint Resolution cannot annex Hawaii. 55th Cong. 2d Sess. 31 Cong. Rec. 6585.
Page 5: "No one claimed that Congress had power beyond the boundaries of the United States".
The following is regarding "The legislative history is more than clear: Congress deliberately sought to deny the Courts of the State of hawaii in rem jurisdiction."3 " Public Law 86-3 is the sole basis by which this Court derives its very existence, let alone its powers."
"3 Leaders of both the Republic of Hawaii and the United States were well aware of this fact. See Correspondence of Sanford Dole, President of Hawaii to A. Hartwell, dated November 15 , 1899 from the State Archives of Hawaii ("A reference to the joint resolution of annexation and the treaty shows clearly the untenable position of the President's order in that it attempts to affect land transfers made between July 7, and August 12 , 1898; for the treaty by Article 1st agrees that the Hawaiian Islands be annexed to the united States under the name of the Territory of Hawaii ;") the joint resolution changes this in a most radical way in the first paragraph by annexing the Hawaiian islands "as a part of the territory of the United States." The Treaty agreement having been departed from in this important particular by the joint resolution, it cannot be of course contended that the letter has an authority in relations to the Hawaiian Islalnds until it was accepted by us which acceptance took place on the 12th of August 1898." The protracted debate over the Joint Resolution had brought this fact to public attention. No one claimed that Congress had power beyond the boundaries of the United States."
Professor Williamson Chang under penalty of perjury stated the following:
He is licensed to practice in the State of Hawaii and before the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii and that he is now the attorney for Rachel B. Painter and appears on her behalf in the above entitled matter.
That he as filed a complaint in the United States District court for the District of Columbia that relates to this case.
Said action is titled, Painter v. The United States of America , LCIV98001737 and was filed on July 10, 1998.
That said action is related in that it seeks declaratory relief as to the scope and meaning of the Act of Admission, Section Two.
That Section Two of the Act of Admission excludes the Island of Palmyra from the State of Hawaii. That such was the intent of section two.
That the same section two also excludes the island of Oahu , on which the property here is located. That the legislative history of section two supports this plain reading of section two.
That said section two states that:
"The State of Hawaii hall consist of all the islands, together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial waters , included in the Territory of Hawaii, except the atoll known as Palmyra Island, together with its appurtenant waters and territorial reefs, but said State shall not be deemed to include the Midway Islands, San Island (offshore of Johnston Island) or Kingman Reef , together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial waters."
That the area within the Territory of Hawaii was set by section two of the Act of april 30, 1900, which states:
"That the islands acquired by the United States of America under an Act of Congress entitled "Joint Resolution to provide for annexing the Hawaiian Islands to the United States,' approved July seventh eighteen hundred and ninety eight, shall be known as the Territory of Hawaii."
That he is aProfessor of Law at the University of Hawaii , William s. Richardson School of Law.
That among his duties as a Professor of Law he has been required to develop courses in Native Hawaiian Rights and Legal History.
That he received a grant from the National Science foundation to study the evolution of property rights in Hawaii.
14. That he shall attach, when certified by the Library of Congress , copies of various documents relating to this motion. That said certified documents should be available within two weeks.
That in the course of fulfilling the terms of the above grant, and in the course of his duties as a Professor of Law at the University of Hawaii, assigned to Native Hawaiian Rights and Legal History that the following documents have come to his attention:
The records of the debates on the Joint Resolution to Provide for Annexing the Hawaiian Islands, from the debates on that resolution of the United States Senate , particularly those pages of the Congressional Record, volume 31 pages 6331-6369, 6634-6634 and 6585-6572 chich contain statements of numerous senators that the Joing Resolution was not a treaty, and could not have any effect on Hawaii.
Records of the debates on the Act of april 30, 1900, which show that the Joint Resolution, as viewed by the Senate two years later did not incorporate Hawaii as territory of the United States. Those statements are on various pages of volume 33 of the Congressional Record , such as 2385-2391.
The supreme Court Record as found in the Library of Congress, the Law Library thereof,for the case Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U.S. 197 (1903). The decision itself, together with the record of briefs of appellee and appellant in that matter show 1) that the Supreme Court ruled that the Joing Resolution did not incorporate the Hawaiian Islands as territory of the United States and that 2) the Appellee, then Territory of Hwaii took the position that the Joint Resolution did not make Hawaiii part of the United Sttes. (See brief of appellant Edmund Dole, Attorney General of the Territory of Hawaii.)
Other documents, such as volume 23 of the Opinions of the Attorney General of the United States, numerous opinions of the Attorney General state that the Joint Resolution did not incorporate Hawaii as part of the United States. In particular, Hawaii remained separate and independent for numerous purposes identified only with the rights of a sovereign and independent nation: to wit Hawaii was permitted to lay a tonnage tax on shipping between Hawaii and the United States, Hawaii was deemed separate and sovereign for the purposes of claims by British subjects arising from torts allegedly committed against them by the Provisional Government of Hawaii and Hawaii was not "the United States" for the purposes of the existing laws of the United States excluding Chinese.
House Report 305 pf the 55th Congress which shows that the ceremonies held on August 12 , 1898, in Honolulu, Hawaii had no legal effect. That is also the opinion of the United States Attorney General as stated in volume 23, relating to the "Public Lands" See pages 628 et seq.
Documents that show the intent behind section two of the Admission Act: That in the deliberations on the Statehood bill, S.49 in 1953-54, the Senate Interior and Insular Affairs committee rejected the language defining the boundaries for the future state of Hawaii, as then proposed in the draft of the State Constitution approved by the people of Hawaii November 7, 1950.
That the reasons for such rejection are partly stated in a "confidential memo" of Clark Clifford to Senator Earle Clements. That such memo notes that the definition of the State, as proposed by the people would differ from the definition of the State as set forth by the Senate in S. 49. That the Senate must reject the definition as proposed by the State Constitution. That the people of Hawaii must affirm the changes as demanded by the Senate. That, according to Clark, if the Constitution is not amended, either by reassembling the Constitutional Convention , or by a vote specially held prior to statehood, then Hawaii should not be admitted as a state.
That numerous proposed alternatives to the present boundaries of the State were considered by the Senate Interior and Insular Affairs Committee, and that such alternatives would have included the Palmyra Islands as well as the Island of Oahu. That such alternatives were rejected in favor of the present language. That the present language is identical to Committee Print 6 of S.49. Committee Print 6 adopts the approach of Committee Print 5. Committee Print 5 differs substantially from all earlier versions as committee Print 5 states that the area of the State shall consist of that of the Territory, except the atoll known as Palmyra. That Print 4 and earlier prints, contained such language that would have included all islands within a certain designated parallelogram as defined by reference to longitude and attitude. That such approach was recommended by the Department of Justice , in a letter of J. Lee Rankin of January 11, 1954. Those approached would have affirmatively included islands within the new state. Thus, the adoption of the prsent language displays conscious intent to exclude all islands.
That said approach continued the existing policy of Congress whereby the Territory was defined by reference to the legal effect of the Joint Resolution.
That certain Senators on the Senate Interior and Insular Affairs committee were well aware that the Joint Resolution did not acquire for the United States either the island of Palmyra or the Island of Oahu. That such knowledge can be imputed from the transcripts of the Senate Interior and Insular Affairs committee, as to a non-public hearing of March 17, 1953. Such knowledge can be imputed to Senator Clinton Anderson who was so informed that the Joint Resolution did not incorporate the Hawaiian Islands by memorandum in April of 1954.
That the plain meaning of section two is supported by the available legislative history.
That this motion is brought arising from counsel's duty under the Code of Professional Responsibility to zealously represent his clients. That said grounds for this motion are basic and elementary. The boundaries of the State are within the knowledge of those who practice beforee the Bar of the Courts of this State. That said counsel is not bringing this motion for the purposes of delay or harassment. Rather, the failure to raise this issue, in the course of representation would be possible grounds for incompetent representation.
Under Pentaly of Perjury, I, Williamson Chang states that such are true and correct, the documentary evidence referred to does exist and was found and examined by myself, in various archives and libraries, including the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress.
AFFIANT FURTHER SAYETH NAUGHT.
(Signed)
Williamson B. C. Chang
Subscribed and Sworn to Before Me:
This Wed . Day of 29 July, 1998.
(signed)
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF HAWAII
My Commission Expires: 9-5-99
L.S.

2000

Article "Justice memo shows U.S. never legally annexed Hawaii" THE HONOLULU ADVERTISER, Sunday, March 12, 2000.




http://api.ning.com/files/Zi4pcGvMO6-PTC49XhmoiRCoj3h52Z08w8T8zEs7-UrQRrbh41RpxXX6pHHcCtlW*K2qoMnP5sw2ixn4qdWCiMKPC23kCYQ4/justicememo.jpg" width="503"/>
Tags: annexation
Reference:  https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2018/03/justice-memo-shows-us-never-legally.html



2011


http://theglobalrealm.com/2011/06/13/why-hawaii-is-not-a-illegitima...
Why Hawai'i is Not a Legitimate State: What the Birthers Missed
Why Hawai'i is Not a Legitimate State: What the Birthers Missed
By THOMAS NAYLOR
CounterPunch.org
June 10 -- 12, 2011
In the brouhaha over whether President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii or not, few seem to realize, that in the eyes of many historians and legal scholars, Hawaii is not a legitimate state of the United States of America. If the government of Hawaii had not been illegally overthrown in 1893 by the U.S. Marines through a classic act of Manifest Destiny and American-style gunboat diplomacy, Hawaii would still be an independent, sovereign nation today.

Notwithstanding a series of clever illegal moves by the U.S. government, Hawaii cannot be considered a legally bona fide state of the United States. In 1898 the United States unilaterally abrogated all of Hawaii's existing treaties and purported to annex it on the basis of a Congressional resolution. Two years later the U.S. illegally established the so-called Territory of Hawaii on the basis of the spurious Organic Act. After a period of prolonged belligerent occupation by the U.S., Hawaii was placed under United Nations Charter, Article 73, as a "non-self-governing territory" under the administrative authority of the United States. Then in 1959 the U.S. falsely informed the U.N. that Hawaii had become the 50th state of the United States after an illegal plebiscite. Among those allowed to vote in this invalid election were members of the U.S. military and their dependents stationed in Hawaii. In other words, Hawaii's occupiers were permitted to vote on its future.
In November 1993, President Bill Clinton signed Public Law 103-150 apologizing to the 140,000 Native Hawaiians, who call themselves Kanaka Maoli, for the January 17, 1893, invasion of Hawaii deposing Queen Liliuokalani which led to Hawaii's illegal annexation by the United States and eventually to statehood in 1959. This apology implicitly recognized the unrelinquished inherent sovereignty and right of self-determination of the Native Hawaiian people.
Whether it was his intention or not, President Bill Clinton clearly raised the expectations of the Kanaka Maoli that one day Hawaii might once again be viewed as an independent nation-state. The downtrodden Kanaka Maoli, who make up less than 12 percent of Hawaii's population, "die younger, earn less, go to jail more frequently, and are more likely to be homeless than any other ethnic group in the islands," according to the Honolulu Weekly.
If Barack Obama were born in Hawaii, and his birth certificate says that he was, then why has he shown so little interest in the plight of Native Hawaiians? Bill Clinton has done a lot more for the Kanaka Maoli than Barack Obama, even though Obama pretends to be a compassionate liberal.
At one level, it matters not whether President Obama was born in Hawaii, Kenya, Indonesia, or Saudi Arabia. The real issue is how does he behave. Therein lies the rub. Not unlike his friend Donald Trump, Obama has a very strong predisposition towards violence and war, caters almost exclusively to the rich and powerful, and palls around with the right wing government of Israel.
Hawaii became an alleged state of the United States as a result of a foreign policy based on full spectrum dominance and imperial overstretch -- the same foreign policy employed by Obama over a century later in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, and Palestine.
President Obama's benign neglect of the Hawaiian victims of American nineteenth century imperialism says more about who he is than the name of the country on his birth certificate.
Thomas H. Naylor is Founder of the Second Vermont Republic and Professor Emeritus of Economics at Duke University. His books include: Downsizing the U.S.A., Affluenza, The Search for Meaning and The Abandoned Generation: Rethinking Higher Education
http://www.counterpunch.org/naylor06102011.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/naylor06102011.html

2011 


- Tane Inciong:

Reasons Why We Are Not Part of the United States of America...

Using their own U.S. and fake-State of Hawaii constitutions and laws and their Apology Bill, we can see where they "shoot themselves in their feet". Add to that the much discounted and over-looked Ku'e Petitions against annexation (Sept. 1897) whereby approximately 96% of the bona fide subjects of the Kingdom of Hawai'i responded against it which can be considered a plebiscite of its citizens. This Ku'e Petitions answers the Turpie Resolution of 31 May 1894.
The fact that U.S. Secretary James L. Blaine's advice, supported later by then U.S. President Benjamin Harrison and others within the U.S. government and community, was to destabilize the Kingdom of Hawaii without setting international precedent culminated in 1887 and conspired to overthrow and take control of the Kingdom of Hawaii for the purpose of annexing its territory to the United States of America for dominance within the Pacific Ocean for its Imperialism and Expansionism. This led to the active invasion and belligerent occupation unlawfully executed in 1893 by settting up a puppet "Provisional Government"/Republic of Hawai'i.

After the Treaty of Annexation was twice rejected, first withdrawn by newly-elected President Cleveland from U.S.. Congress and Executive Agreement established; then another treaty that was rejected by U.S. Congress, The Presidential-successor, McKinley allowed Congress to internally create the unlawful Newlands Resolution to annex Hawaii on 12 August 1898. This blatantly ignored the Presidential Agreement and the contested Ku'e Petitions of September 1897 and continued setting precedence in the international arena and double-standard justice.

It is noteworthy to review the Organic Act of 30 April 1900:
Section 4. Citizenship. That all persons who were citizens of the Republic of Hawaii on August 12 , 1898 are hereby declared (!) to be citizens of the U.S. and citizens of the Territory of Hawai'i. -U.S. citizens that reside in Territory of Hawaii for one year on or since 12 August 1898 shall be citizens of the Territory of Hawaii. (This secured U.S. citizens who came to tip the population count for U.S. control to remain as permanent residence without losing their nationality and freedom to travel between the U.S. and Hawaii without a passport. The Ku'e Petitions of 1897 confirms that the bona fide subjects of the Kingdom of Hawaii did not support the Republic of Hawaii and therefore not citizens of the ipso facto government.)

- Chinese Ban was applied.
- Puerto Rican did not lose political status by removing to Hawaii in 1901 but became U.S. citizens, hence, entitled to vote in Hawaii.
-24 March 1934 - Filipino placed on quota basis as aliens. Specifically inapplicable in Hawaii and immigration is determined by the Department of the Interior on basis of industrial needs. Filipino national in Hawaii became alien by proclamation of Philippine Independence.
- A person born in the Kingdom of Hawaii of British parents domiciled there was held to be a citizen of the Republic of Hawaii although he was registered at birth at the British consulate and had never renounced allegiance to the British Crown nor sworn allegiance to the Hawaiian government. (you can see U.S. preference for caucasians.)


The Admission Act (18 March 1959):
Section 19. Nothing contained in this Act shall operate to confer United States nationality nor to terminate nationality heretofore lawfully acquired, or restore nationality heretofore lost under any law of the (U.S.) or under any treaty to which the (U.S.) is or was a party.

(Since we were never lawfully citizens of the Republic of Hawaii as deemed by the Ku'e Petitions, U.S. belligerent occupation and never relinquished our rights as Hawaiian subjects, the U.S. breaches of the treaties, the U.S. violation of the law of occupation, law of neutrality, violations of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment , the Constitution and Laws of the Kingdom of Hawaii, and the treaties between both countries; we are still Hawaiian subjects of the Kingdom of Hawaii.)

A Hawaii patriot,

Tane 



2013

"U.S. Pacific Command Admits to Police Officer "No Treaty of Annexation" posted on January 20, 2013.

Military Admission that there was No Treaty of Annexation - For the Records





U.S. Pacific Command Admits to Police Officer “No Treaty of Annexation”



PACOM insigniaOn January 17, 2013 a hearing was held in a foreclosure case, Bank of Hawai‘i v. Keli‘iho‘omalu, in the Circuit Court of Second Circuit in Wailuku, Island of Maui. The Keli‘iho‘omalus filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the court does not legally exist and if the case was not dismissed the actions taken by the Court and the Plaintiff would constitute war crimes and they will be reported to the United Nations Human Rights Commission in Geneva, Switzerland.
In their motion, the Keli‘iho‘omalus provided clear evidence of an illegal occupation by the United States and that without a treaty of annexation, the State of Hawai‘i government and its courts are illegal. The Keli‘iho‘malus argued, “This Court cannot claim the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit has subject matter jurisdiction in light of the evidence to the contrary, and if this court disregards the evidence it will be in direct violation of Article 147 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, IV, by willfully depriving the Defendants a fair and regular trial, which is a grave breach and a war crime.”
Attorney Dexter Kaiama provided special appearance for the Keli‘iho‘omalus at the hearing. In addition to the evidence already submitted, Kaiama read into the record a “Declaration of Leland Pa,” a Hawai‘i County police officer that inquired into war crimes committed by Hawai‘i Island Circuit Court Judges Greg Nakamura and Glen S. Hara, and District Court Judge Barbara Takase.
The complaints were filed by Kaiama with the U.S. Pacific Command and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva, Switzerland, and alleged these judges deprived his clients of their right to a fair and regular trial during occupation, being a war crime under the 1949 Geneva Convention, IV. The basis of the complaints were the 1893 Lili`uokalani assignment and the Restoration Agreement, being international compacts, the 1907 Hague Convention, IV, and the 1949 Geneva Convention, IV, and U.S. Army Field Manual 27-10.
According to the declaration, Pa initiated the inquiry in September 2012 as part of his “duty to identify potentially serious law enforcement and government problems” after obtaining “copies of war crime complaints from the Law Office of Dexter K. Kaiama.” He stated he began the inquiry to see how he would be affected as a police officer and “if it would pose potential problems for law enforcement and government officials.”
At 10:30 p.m., November 6, 2012, Pa called the ”Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Human Rights Council Branch-Complaint Procedure Unit. United Nations Office at Geneva” and that a spokesperson confirmed they are in receipt of the complaints but could not provide any more assistance. Pa stated the spokesperson recommended that he “contact U.S. departments that deal with war crime complaints.”
On November 8, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., Pa called the headquarters of the U.S. Pacific Command at Camp Smith, Island of O‘ahu, and spoke with Ronald Winfrey, Principal Deputy Staff Judge Advocate. Pa informed Winfrey of his concerns and how these complaints could affect his duties as a police officer. When asked about the complaints from Kaiama, Winfrey stated “he knows those complaints because out of all the complaints he has read those are the most precise and clear.”
Pa stated that as he “began discussing the basis of the complaints such as no treaty of annexation, Mr. Winfrey candidly and without hesitation said, ‘Oh yes, there is no treaty.’” According to Pa, Winfrey attempted to ease Pa’s concerns about the implications of war crimes by stating that U.S. Courts will not hear these cases because they would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Pa then asked Winfrey to respond to his questions.
  • “Since there is no treaty, can the unresolved issues of the executive agreements and Hawaii’s occupation get resolved by a U.S. Court in the future?” Winfrey “stated that is possible.”
  • “If a U.S. Court should find in favor of plaintiff’s claim regarding the executive agreements and Hawai‘i’s occupation, then the prosecution of said War Crimes would come into play?” Winfrey “stated that is possible.”
  • “Since there is no treaty, the plaintiff does not need a U.S. court ruling? The Plaintiff could get these issues resolved in an International venue and then prosecution of war crimes would come into play?” Winfrey “stated that is possible.”
Pa informed Winfrey that as a police officer he swore “an oath to uphold the laws and constitution of the United States. Article 6, clause 2 of the U.S. constitution declares that treaties, which includes executive agreements, are the supreme law of the land. Because there is no treaty of annexation we are faced with a difficult situation, which needs clarification and I find it necessary to notify my superiors.”
Pa’s telephone conversation with Winfrey took place before the Hawaiian Kingdomacceded to the International Criminal Court (ICC) on December 10, 2012 and beginning on March 4, 2013 the ICC can begin the investigation of war crimes committed within Hawaiian territory. After March 4, 2013, the U.S. Pacific Command will also be subject to investigation and prosecution by the ICC.
Reference:  https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2018/04/the-doctrine-of-political-question.html


2018

Dr. Alfred deZayas, United Nations:







Dr. Alfred deZayas 1st Letter

Dr. Alfred deZayas Memorandum
Geneva School of Diplomacy & International Relations - University Institute
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A294a398c-cf2c-4623-8841-2aaf7cf3145b


Reference:
https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/09/more-on-rights-of-protected-persons-add.html



Additional References:

Documented Lies about the Crown Lands called "Ceded Lands" -  No Annexation = No Lands belong to the entity State, City, and U.S. Government:

https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/02/anti-pirates-in-hawaii-series-our-crown.html



Anti-Pirates in Hawaii Series:  






Our Crown Lands - Private Properties of Our Royal Families and Government Lands of the Hawaiian Kingdom



                                                 or

Why the entity an illegal State of Hawaii does Not Own Our Crown Lands

                                   
SUMMARY

All the above are evidence showing why the entity /fraud based State, City & Counties, and U.S. government owns Nothing in the Hawaiian Islands/Hawaiian archipelago.

The fraud entity Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees were not the alodio land owners in 1884 and even today.  

It was the same characters who assumed lands, assets of our Royal Family's, including Bernice Pauahi Bishop who supported the planners of dethroning Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, and set up a Fraud Trust in 1909.

It was the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees who conveyed lands of Pearl Harbor, etc. to Aliens, and they were Not the alodio land owners.

The Hawaiian Kingdom Supreme Court of original jurisdiction documented the conspirators/trusts/trustees and stripped the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates/KSBE/ Kamehameha Schools Trust, the Fraud Trust of Liliuokalani/ Queen Liliuokalani which was created in 1909 and declared them guilty.

Legal notices through e-mail, and certified Post Office mailings were made and received by the U.S. President Trump, Governor David Ige, Kamehameha Schools/KSBE/ Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees, and Liliuokalani Trust/Queen Liliuokalani Trust Trustees based on the Fraud 1909 Trust created by the same people who were the Trustees of Bernice Pauahi Bishop in 1884, dethroned Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, and created the Fraud 1909 Trust of Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani.

The above researches by the multiples of people above are evidence for all our kanaka maoli, friends, and interested others for the records, posted for the Public, use for reclaiming alodio lands gifted as forever lands from Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli.

aloha.

Reference:

All 779 issues of the IOLANI - the Royal Hawk news on the web, 25+ books, pamphlets, thousands of articles posted by amelia gora, a Royal person, One of our Royal Family's Representative, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, Judicial Tribunal Judge, Supreme Court of original jurisdiction Judge, Hawaiian Genealogical Society Representative, land owner, landlord, Konohiki, One of the true trustees of Kaeha/Kamakaeha/Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani whose trust was created in 1872, and One of the descendants of Kalola (w) next-of-kin to Bernice Pauahi Bishop in her Probate, a hanai/adopted children's descendant of Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani from two (2) of them

https://www.opednews.com/Diary/The-Hawaiian-Islands-ARE-N-by-Amelia-Gora-110627-133.html

https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/08/focus-on-alodioalodial-forever-and.html


Repost:  The FOREVER Alodial Titles in the Hawaiian Islands





                     The FOREVER Alodial Titles in the Hawaiian Islands

                                                   researched by Amelia Gora (2018)

Note:  The following shows that the Alodial Titles are Forever, and Forever vs. the
Usurpers entity the University of Hawaii whose claimed educators promote Fraud, Deceit, Criminal Malfeasance, Genocide...……….keep this for information with you land documents!


Kamehameha III's Speech of 1851 shows Alodial Titles and Fee Simple to Aliens:





Polynesian. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu], Hawaii) 1844-1864, April 29, 1848, Page 198, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015408/1848-04-29/ed-1/seq-2/

  
  
  
 
NOTE:  See the speech of Kaeo disclosing that Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli gave lands FOREVER AND FOREVER
See Case Precedence Posts because no one can take away your Alodio/Alodial lands.
aloha.

**********************


                                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LV5qNZox4T8
**********************
facebook:

Comments

No comments:

Post a Comment