The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Evidence of Hate, Animosity by the U.S. Against Palestine
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
Facebook:
Amelia Gora
*******
References:
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Taxes from Hawaii Gotten Illegally by U.S. Congress
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Taxes from Hawaii Gotten Illegally by U.S. Congress
- Piracy in Taxes Evidence -
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
No Taxation Without Representation
Prince Kuhio was not a Representative because he was not allowed to vote.
Therefore, taxation by the U.S. Congress was gotten without Representation.
"No Taxation without Representation."
Which means, taxes were gotten from Hawaii illegally. See article below:
The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, August 15, 1901, Page 13, Image 13
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
DISCUSSION
There were no entries about Hawaii in the most recent change to the phrase: (1) No Taxation without Representation, and (2) the entry shown after the following explanation is is the latest found on the web:
(1)
No taxation without representation
No taxation without representation
https://study.com/academy/
No Taxation Without Representation History & Example
Who said "No taxation without representation"?
The American colonists first began using this slogan in the 1760s to voice their concerns and protest against new taxes imposed by the British on goods. This occurred after the passing of the Stamp Act, its repeal a year later, and the passing of the Townshend Acts.
Why is taxation without representation unfair?
Taxation without representation is unfair because the people who are being taxed have no say in the matter. They are not heard by the government because nobody is there to defend their case, yet they are taxed anyways. An analogy to this would be a mediator only listening to one side of an argument, thereby making a decision only off of that side.
What did the slogan "No taxation without representation" mean and why was it a rally cry for the colonists?
No taxation without representation was first used as a phrase in colonial America. The people stated that since they were not represented in British parliament through a physical diplomat, then they should not be taxed. As the British continued to set harsher taxes upon the colonists and imported goods, the slogan became more popular. It eventually led to events including the Boston Massacre and Boston Tea Party.
How did "No taxation without representation" lead to the American Revolution?
The phrase was used as a protest against imposing taxes on goods in high-demand. The colonists had no voice in government to argue against being taxed, which angered them further. The British insisted that since the colonists were under British rule, they were already being represented virtually through the parliament.
What does No Taxation Without Representation mean? The phrase "No Taxation Without Representation" is a verbal protest against taxes being imposed upon a people that feel like they have no say in the matter. Over the centuries, this slogan has also been used to express frustration over the governing of an area's trade, politics, and way of life. Additionally, this phrase tends to make an appearance most often during times of conflict. For instance, in the years leading up to the American Revolution, "no taxation without representation" became a popular slogan during open protests against British trading taxes. Without any voice in the government to use to speak out against the government in power, the people were left unable to air their grievances and reach a middle-ground in a civil manner. The building resentment ultimately led to conflict in the American Revolution and beyond. The meaning has changed very little since the 1760s when the term was first used regularly and is used in some places today to convey the same general idea.
also see Wikipedia.com
(2) Shown Here:
Introduced in House (02/24/2021)
117th CONGRESS 1st Session |
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax bona fide residents of the District of Columbia in the same manner as bona fide residents of possessions of the United States.
Mr. Gohmert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax bona fide residents of the District of Columbia in the same manner as bona fide residents of possessions of the United States.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
This Act may be cited as the “No Taxation Without Representation Act”.
The Congress finds the following:
(1) The phrase “no taxation without representation” was a rallying cry of many American colonists during the period of British rule in the 1760s and early 1770s. The slogan gained widespread notoriety after the passage of the Sugar Act on April 5, 1764.
(2) American colonists increasingly resented having taxes levied upon them without having any legislators they elected who were voting in Parliament in London. The idea that there should be no taxation without representation dated back even further. Benjamin Franklin stated, “it is suppos’d an undoubted Right of Englishmen not to be taxed but by their own Consent given thro’ their Representatives.”.
(3) This issue became even more defined in 1765 with the passage of the Stamp Act which was the first true attempt to levy a direct tax on the American colonies. Ultimately the tax was repealed, but the idea of no taxation without representation persisted.
(4) Article I, section 2, clause 1 of the United States Constitution, states, “The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the SEVERAL STATES, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.”.
(5) The Organic Act of 1801 placed Washington, DC, under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States Congress and people in the District were no longer considered residents of Virginia or Maryland.
(6) Many in Washington, DC, were immediately opposed to the idea of being taxed without congressional representation and over the years several congressional leaders introduced constitutional amendments to give the District of Columbia voting representation, though none were successful.
(7) In 1898, Puerto Rico was acquired by the United States and currently has a Resident Commissioner with limited voting rights. Section 933 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 exempts bona fide citizens who are residents of Puerto Rico for the entire taxable year from Federal taxes on income earned in Puerto Rico.
(8) On March 31, 1917, the United States took possession of the Virgin Islands and in 1927, the territory’s residents were granted citizenship. Under section 932 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, individuals who are bona fide residents of the United States Virgin Islands during the entire taxable year, and who fully pay all income tax liabilities to the United States Virgin Islands, are not subject to Federal income taxes on their income.
(9) Guam was established as a territory of the United States after the passage of the Guam Organic Act of 1950. Under the provisions of section 935 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, residents of Guam are required to file tax returns with Guam, but not with the United States Federal Government and therefore the residents do not have to pay United States Federal income taxes.
(10) The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands was established in 1975 after residents decided not to pursue independence, but instead they opted to enter into territory negotiations. The tax treatment of the Northern Mariana Islands is similar to the structure of Guam in that bona fide residents are not required to pay Federal income taxes.
(11) American Samoa, which is technically considered “unorganized” because no Organic Acts have been passed by Congress, is governed by section 931 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Under this section, bona fide year-round residents are exempt from Federal taxes on income they earn in Samoa, Guam, and Northern Mariana Islands, but are subject to Federal taxes on income earned elsewhere.
(12) In keeping with the early history and democratic traditions of the United States, the principles established in the Constitution, and in conformance with the other territories of the United States which have delegates but no Representative, the residents of the District of Columbia should be exempt from paying United States Federal income taxes.
SEC. 3. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR INCOME FROM SOURCES WITHIN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
(a) In General.—Subpart D of part III of subchapter N of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“(a) General Rule.—In the case of an individual who is a bona fide resident of the District of Columbia during the entire taxable year, gross income shall not include—
“(1) income derived from sources within the District of Columbia, and
“(2) income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by such individual within the District of Columbia.
“(b) Deductions, Etc. Allocable To Excluded Amounts Not Allowable.—An individual shall not be allowed—
“(1) as a deduction from gross income any deductions (other than the deduction under section 151, relating to personal exemptions), or
“(2) any credit, properly allocable or chargeable against amounts excluded from gross income under this section.
“(c) Bona Fide Resident And Other Applicable Rules.—For purposes of this section, rules similar to the rules of section 876, 937, 957(c), 3401(a)(8)(D), and 7654 shall apply.”.
(b) Clerical Amendment.—The table of sections for subpart D of part III of subchapter N of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
“Sec. 938. Income from sources within the District of Columbia.”.
(c) Effective Date.—The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SUMMARY
Hawaii was not Annexed, yet Taxes were collected.
So, the following is found to be true:
1) breaches and violations against a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation is documented.
2) There was no Annexation, it was all lies.
3) U.S. Congress supported the U.S. Military invasion into Hawaii.
See: article on Pearl Harbor Coaling Station
4) U.S. Congress failed to support U.S. President Grover Cleveland who gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, 1894, and 1897.
5) U.S. Congress failed to follow rule of law in regards to taxes because 'No Taxes without Representation' was not adhered to.
Delegate Prince Kuhio was not allowed to vote and was not a Representative when it came to taxes, etc.
Therefore, the U.S. Congress violated their own U.S. Constitution of 1787.
The Neutrality Treaty was violated a number of times by U.S. President Benjamin Harrison, U.S. President William McKinley, et. als.
Piracy is an ongoing activity by the United States as documented in the issue of taxes, etc.
aloha.
*****************
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: More Piracy Evidence in the Kingdom of Hawaii by the U.S.
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: More Piracy Evidence in the Kingdom of Hawaii by the U.S.
- Piracy Evidence -
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
from Facebook:
Alapaki Kim
The Legiitimate Government in Hawaii Series: More Piracy Evidence in the Kingdom of Hawaii by the U.S.
- Piracy Evidence -
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
from Facebook:
Alapaki Kim
***********
Royal Family's Legal Directive/Legal Notice No. 2024 -0430: Eviction Notice and Reminder dated April 30, 2024 Royal Family's Private Properties Inventory Project Status - from Amelia Gora, Royal Family Representative, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles member, Supreme Court/Superior Court Judge, Judicial Tribunal Judge, etc. - Kingdom of Hawaii
Eviction Notice and Reminder dated April 30, 2024
Royal Family's Private Properties
Inventory Project Status - from Amelia Gora, Royal Family Representative, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles member, Supreme Court/Superior Court Judge, Judicial Tribunal Judge, etc. - Kingdom of Hawaii
Note: The Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates/KSBE/Kamehameha Schools Trustees played a significant role in the invasion of the Kingdom of Hawaii, the criminal assumption of lands, monies based on a life interest of Charles Reed Bishop that ended in 1915. The Trustees over time conveyed lands, invested with monies that was not theirs, including conveying Royal Family's lands to the U.S. government, the State of Hawaii, and others without ownership. Contracts made by the Trustees are and were illegal contracts and made null and void. The contracts were made by non-owners/the Trustees and now recognized as Pirates, conspirators, and contrary to our Neutrality law in place since 1854, and now documented in Article XIV of the Treaty of 1849 ratified in 1850 for Piracy, theft, etc. Please keep this for your records. Thank you.
.png)
To: Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates Trustees /KSBE/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees
Neutral Nation to Neutral Nations/Nations Legal Advisory/Notice No. 2023-0522 Facts About Charles Reed Bishop Affecting All Lands in Hawaii from Amelia Gora, a Royal Person, Representative, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles, Judicial Tribunal Judge, etc. - Kingdom of Hawaii
Neutral Nation to Neutral Nations/Nations Legal Advisory/Notice No. 2023-0522 Facts About Charles Reed Bishop Affecting All Lands in Hawaii from Amelia Gora, a Royal Person, Representative, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles, Judicial Tribunal Judge, etc. - Kingdom of Hawaii
Greetings,
Monday, May 22, 2023
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: FACTS ABOUT Charles Reed Bishop Affecting All Lands in Hawaii
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: FACTS ABOUT Charles Reed Bishop Affecting All Lands in Hawaii
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2023)
Most people don't know the Truth About the Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates/ Trust of Bernice Pauahi Bishop and her White Supremacist Husband Charles Reed Bishop.
Charles Reed Bishop and Trustees played a part in dethroning Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, and importantly he had only a Life Interest in his wife Bernice Pauahi Bishop's Estate.
He became part of an Alien Nation that had No Sovereignty called the Provisional Government, turned Republic then made a Territory of the United States turned Territory of Hawaii by a President who failed to follow the Rule of Law named U.S. President William McKinley.
See: https://amelia-gora.
Charles Reed Bishop had only a Life Interest in the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop as evidenced by the Deed below which was found at the Bureau of Conveyances, Liber 142 pages 142-143 in the Kalanimoku Building, Downtown Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.
See:
Life interest ends upon one's death. A transfer of a life interest does not extend time to the person or others who have no legal rights to Royal Family lands. These documents are evidence of a conspiracy by Aliens who moved to defraud the true heirs and supported by bankrupt nations - the U.S., Great Britain, and France who had invested in the American Civil War and were bankrupt since 1865.
The three (3) nations had a protectorate over the Kingdom of Hawaii until 1893 then placed a protectorate over the Alien entity called the Provisional Government.
The three (3) nations also breached the Neutrality Law of 1854, and the Treaties.
TIMELINE
1884 - Bernice Pauahi Bishop died of breast cancer. She was the next- of kin to Ruth Keelikolani who died in 1883 and inherited 353,000+ acres of land, a Palace, artifacts, etc.
Her total lands amounted to 400,000+ acres of land, a Palace, artifacts, etc.
Reference:
http://sunnycv.com/steve/ar/
Bernice Pauahi Bishop's husband inherited 1/2 of her estate for life - a life interest.
Bernice Pauahi Bishop's next-of-kin was Kalola, a stepsister and cousin who was also a Kamehameha descendant.
Kalola inherited 1/2 of her estate and the full estate after the death of Charles Reed Bishop.
1886 - Kalola died and her descendants/heirs lived on.
Her heirs were Kahananui, widow of her son Kahekili/Alapai Kahekili Luluhiwalani who had a son named Ioela.
Kalola and her husband Luluhiwalani/S. Luluhiwalani had a hanai/adopted daughter named Kapooloku/Kapoolohu/Abigaila/
Ioela married Kapooloku/Kapoolohu/Abigaila/
1893 - Charles Reed Bishop conspired against Queen Liliuokalani and helped to dethrone her. Bishop lost all interest in the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop.
Bishop became part of an Alien entity called the Provisional Government which had no Sovereignty.
Meanwhile, the Kingdom of Hawaii with full Sovereignty continued on.
Charles Reed Bishop carried on as if he did not lose all interest in lands in the Kingdom of Hawaii.
Charles Reed Bishop transferred his life interest to himself, and the Trustees of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates.
1896 - Charles Reed Bishop sold Princess Ruth Keelikolani's Palace to the Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii which had no Sovereignty.
Bishop did not own the full interest in Princess Ruth Keelikolani's Palace because he had inherited only 1/2 interest for his life only.
Kalola's descendants/heirs were also heirs with 1/2 interest and a full interest since 1893.
Note: Charles Reed Bishop died in 1915.
Charles Reed Bishop became Part of the Provisional Government, turned Republic etc. Affected the Ownership of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, lands in Waikiki, the Aquarium, the Bishop Museum, etc.
The Reformation of the Kingdom of Hawaii Trust was made by a foreign, Alien entity assuming Private Properties of our Royal Family from a 100% Sovereign Government
- The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, July 28, 1896, Image 1
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/ lccn/sn82015415/1896-07-28/ed- 1/... - Charles Reed Bishop left the islands to work with the J.P. Morgan bankers and ran with the monies, investments, etc.
- Bishop's interest in his wife's estate legally ended on January 17, 1893 when he participated in a concerted effort to usurp Queen Liliuokalani.
- The premeditated, planned invasion of Hawaii succeeded due to Charles Reed Bishop, the "backbone" of the usurpation of Queen Liliuokalani and the Pirate who obtained properties, monies, artifacts, gold, etc. under false pretenses.
- His life interest ended and all of the interest in the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop was fully owned by Kalola descendants and heirs.
- 1915 - Charles Reed Bishop died. His life interest in the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop ended upon his death.
- The Trustees of Bernice Pauahi Bishop's interest transferred by Charles Reed Bishop also died.
- The Trustees of Bernice Pauahi Bishop perpetuated fraud, deceit, piracy, plundering, racketeering, etc. and continued on with criminal claims.
- 1959 - U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower through his Executive Order made Hawaii a State of the U.S. with a shared 1/50% interest in Sovereignty.
- 1986 - 1996 Evidence of criminal activity by the Trustees, et.als. of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates recorded by Whistleblower Greg Wongham (dec.) shown at the link: https://iolani-
theroyal.blogspot.com/2023/05/ the-legitimate-government-in- hawaii_0.html - 1996 - An Affidavit/Lien No. 96-177455 (281 pages) was filed which is a lien on all 132 islands (133 includes Loihi) at the Bureau of Conveyances, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii by Amelia Gora. Genealogies, History, Premeditation evidence, etc. included.
- 2000 - There was no Annexation meaning there's no U.S. Jurisdiction in the Hawaiian Islands.
- 2015 - Annexation of Hawaii is a Myth documented by University of Hawaii Law Professor Williamson Chang documented.
- 2018 - The U.S. is an occupier as documented by United Nations Dr. Alfred deZayas.
- 2019 - Joinder No. Doc A-71510779 filed on July 31, 2019 (118 pages) filed - a Joinder to Afft. Lien No. 96-177455 filed on 12/17/96 (281 pages) with genealogies showing descendants of Kalola exists, Kalola is documented as the next-of-kin to Bernice Pauahi Bishop filed by Francis Gora, John Gora, and Amelia Gora - descendants and heirs of Kalola and Representatives of our Royal Family.
- 2023 - Inventory of Ruth Keelikolani's, Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Kalola's lands, etc. continues.
- Genocide Activists recorded for the Legal Records of the Kingdom of Hawaii while visiting our various lands recording squatters, etc.
- Research incomplete.
- aloha.
- Reference:
- by WBC Chang · 2015 · Cited by 30 — Chang, Williamson B.C.. Darkness over Hawaii: The Annexation Myth Is the Greatest Obstacle to Progress ...by D over Hawaii · Cited by 30 — The Annexation Myth Is the Greatest Obstacle to. Progress. Williamson Chang*. I. INTRODUCTION: THE MYTH THAT HAWAI'I WAS ANNEXED BY THE. UNITED STATES…Because the annexation was illegal, he and others seem to argue, statehood must be void, and the State of Hawaii does not hold legal title to Hawaiian land.10 pagesText of the Hawaiian Annexation Treaties of 1854, ... Beet sugar, annexation not injurious ... The following table shows the change wrought since the.Profile image of Williamson Chang ... Download Free PDF ... The century-long occupation and illegal annexation of Hawaii could not become public in 1953.
- Protectors of the Future, Not Protestors of the Past: Indigenous Pacific ... the against the telescopes on Mauna Kea was Williamson Chang from the Uni- ...
Feb 8, 2022 — Without permission from the U.S. State Department, Minister Stevens recognized the new government and proclaimed Hawaii a U.S. protectorate. - May 10, 2019 — Expert to Hawai`i Judges: Islands Under “Strange Form of Occupation” by U.S. DeZayas addressed this letter to Hawaii Circuit Court Judges Gary ...
- Jan 27, 2013 — Just found out that Greg Wongham Was MURDERED! sorry no details - only from a credible person All Kanaka Maoli, Whistleblowers/Friends of ...
- Jan 27, 2013 — Just found out that Greg Wongham Was MURDERED! sorry no details - only from a credible person. All Kanaka Maoli, Whistleblowers/Friends of ... also see: https://iolani-theroyal.
blogspot.com/2023/05/the- legitimate-government-in- hawaii_0.html
Myron Isherwood of the. Department of Agriculture testified in support of the project. He said the area was abandoned because the lease expired. Isherwood said ...After his honorable discharge lie returned to the Army National Bank as assistant casluer. When that institution was merged with the Bank of. Bishop & Co., Ltd.Sep 19, 2020 — Greg was definitely onto something with the Chinese and Donna Tanoue. Tanoue sat on a board with Gary James Baldwin probably one of the late - ******************************
****************************** *****************************
.png)
Kamehameha Dynasty Allodial Lands No. 2022- 1028 - Royal Family of Kalola (w) next-of-kin to Bernice Pauahi Bishop Billing, etc.
Kamehameha Dynasty Allodial Lands: Ruth Keelikolani, Leleiohoku, Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Abner Paki, Konia, Kalola, Mataio Kekuanaoa, Moses Kekuaiwa, David Kamehameha, Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, Alexander Liholiho/Kamehameha IV, Victoria Kamamalu, Paalua, John Kapena, Kalima (w), Akahi (w), Kahekili, Kapooloku/Abigaila/ Princess Poomaikelani, Kuakamauna, Hooleia (w), Kaliimakalii (w), Pea/Peapea, Kalanihelemaiiluna, Kaoleioku, Kanekapolei (w), Kauieaouli/Kamehameha III, King Lunalilo, Charles Kanaina, King Kalakaua, Queen Kapiolani, Queen Liliuokalani, Grace Kamaikui, Hueu Davis, Kale Davis, Peke Davis, et. als.
Kamehameha Dynasty Allodial Lands
Royal Family of Kalola (w)
Next-of-Kin to Bernice Pauahi Bishop
Descendants and Heirs Allodial Lands
c/o P.O. Box 861781
Wahiawa, Oahu, Hawaii 96786
e-mail: hwngensoc.akg@juno.
Kamehameha Dynasty Allodial Lands No. 2022- 1028 - Royal Family of Kalola (w) next-of-kin to Bernice Pauahi Bishop Billing, etc.
Date: 1028/2022
To: YWCA - Young Women's Christian Association
Subject: Legal Allodial ownership
From: Amelia Gora, Royal Person, Royal Family's Representative, Kingdom of Hawaii
Greetings,
This is to inform you that our Royal family are the landowners of the following land that you occupy.
It has been 5 years and 5 months since we had informed you that we have the Superior/Paramount titles for the land that you have built on.
see:
Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom Legal Notice No. 2017-0602 Oppositions to the entity State of Hawaii use of Haleakala, Maui, and Rents are Due; Oppositions remain for Maunakea, Hawaii, and Rents are Due; Oppositions remain for Hoopili, and all of Honouliuli, Ewa, Oahu, and Rents are Due; Oppositions remain for the Rail which is trespassing on Royal Families lands. Toll Fees, Rents are Due. This is Notice/Evidence No. 2017 - June 2 - Expanded Billings for Rents, etc. from Amelia Gora, Royal person, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, Royal Famtiily(ies) Trustee (one of), House of Nobles, Konohiki, Judicial Tribunal, Hawaiian Genealogical Society Representative, Konohiki Representative for Kamaikaaloa - Kula, Maui -Haleakala Konohiki; Assistant Minister of Interior affecting Maunakea - Hawaii; One of the five (5) Konohiki of Honouliuli - including Hoopili, Ewa, Oahu; Konohiki of Waimalu, Halawa, Kapalama, Downtown Honolulu - includes Iolani Palace and other specific properties owned by Private Property Owner Amelia Gora, et. als., and our Royal Families.
Aliens have only 30 years to stay due to fee simple/rent/lease/freehold/
Aliens can never own Allodial or forever titles.
Allodial titles were given to only kanaka maoli since December 1849, and "confirmed by the Act of the 6th of August last, and the Act of the 10th of July, 1850, allowing to aliens to acquire and convey lands in fee simple..."
Kalola's Family Interest
Because Kalola was the next-of-kin to Bernice Pauahi Bishop, she became the owner of all of Abner Paki's et.als. properties since 1884.
In 1893, Charles Reed Bishop helped to conspire against Queen Liliuokalani the Royal Family and the people.
Charles Reed Bishop lost all interest in lands in the Hawaiian Islands..
Therefore, the YWCA owes back rents/leases because no payments were received by our Royal Family to date.
DATES: 1924 to 2022 for the amounts of $50,000 per acre per month retroactive to 1924 is due our Royal Family and owed to date.
Calculations: 98 years x 12 months = 1,176 months
Amounts due: $37,500 x 1,176 months = $44,100,000 or Forty Four Million, One Hundred Thousand Dollars.
| Location | 1040 Richards St., Honolulu, Hawaii, USA |
|---|---|
| Coordinates |  https://upload.wikimedia.org/https://upload. |
| Built | 1927 |
| Architect | Julia Morgan |
| Architectural style | Beaux-Arts Mediterranean Revival |
| Part of | Hawaii Capital Historic District |
| NRHP reference No. | 78001020 |
| Added to NRHP | 1 December 1978[1] |
Reference: https://en.
Allodial Land Owners / Royal Family Members
Ruth Keelikolani, Leleiohoku, Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Abner Paki, Konia, Kalola, Mataio Kekuanaoa, Moses Kekuaiwa, David Kamehameha, Lot Kamehameha/Kamehameha V, Alexander Liholiho/Kamehameha IV, Victoria Kamamalu, Paalua, John Kapena, Kalima (w), Akahi (w), Kahekili, Kapooloku/Abigaila/Princess Poomaikelani, Kuakamauna, Hooleia (w), Kaliimakalii (w), Pea/Peapea, Kalanihelemaiiluna, Kaoleioku, Kanekapolei (w), Kauieaouli/Kamehameha III, King Lunalilo, Charles Kanaina, King Kalakaua, Queen Kapiolani, Queen Liliuokalani, Grace Kamaikui, Hueu Davis, Kale Davis, Peke Davis, et. als.
Allodial Land Owner Descendant Heir/Successor__________Amelia Gora - also one of our Royal Family's Representatives__________
Location _1040 Richards Street _____Hawaiian Island ____Oahu____ _
Updated Supreme Court Cases to Date 1 - 42
The following are the Supreme Court Cases Heard and Adjudicated Guilty of Conspiracy(ies), Piracy, Racketeering, etc.:
Case 1. Liliuokalani Trust of 1909 and the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates/KSBE/Kamehameha Schools - Bishop Estates/ Kamehameha Schools Guilty of Fraud, Conspiracy, Piracy, etc. Posted at https://maoliworld.com/
Judicial Tribunal Listed as Guilty - Maoliworld
Kahananui (female) (siblings: Kalaikini (female), Ulunui (female), and Isaia) was the daughter of Kuheleloa who was the son of Kauhi. Kauhi was the son of Kailio and Kaawa (female) and his siblings were: Kailio 2, Kalama (female), and Paele. Kailio was the second oldest son of Hueu Davis (siblings: Kale Davis, and Peke Davis) who was the son of Isaac Davis and Kalukuna/Grace Kamaikui. Kailio (siblings: Kahiamoe, and Holokualani) was the grandson of John Young. Hueu Davis, Kale Davis, and Peke Davis were the hanai/adopted children of John Young, Kamehameha, and Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli.
Kahananui (female) married Charles Kuikahi Kawelo/Kauweloa and adopted William Linekona Hokuloa/ Charles Williams/Charles Kauweloa who married Mele Keawe/Keawepoo and had Mary Kauweloa (siblings: Charles Jr., and Annie) who married Albert Castro and had Mary Castro (siblings: Harriet, Alberta, John, Albert, Rudolph, Irene, and Joseph), divorced then married Ceferino Maduli (stepsiblings: Vale, Lucia, Ceferino Jr., Fermina, Francis, and Celestino/Kata).
Abigaila/Kapooloku/Kapoolohu/ Kapoholoku/ Poomaikelani/ Princess Poomaikelani was the daughter of Kuhio and Kinoiki (female). Her siblings were Kapiolani/ Queen Kapiolani, Kinoiki 2 (female), and Kapali/Kapaliaweloa. Their father was Kaumualii of Kauai. His children were: Kealiiahonui, Aaron; Humehume/George Humehume; Kinoiki (female); Kahinu (female); Haupu/Kahekili; Kuheleaumoku; Kahai; Kanekoa; and Kaulia. His stepchildren were all of Kalaniopuu's, Kamehameha's children, stepchildren, and hanai/adopted children.
Abigaila/Kapooloku/Kapoolohu/ Kapoholoku/ Poomaikelani/ Princess Poomaikelani was a hanai of Luluhiwalani and Kalola, the parents of Kahekili (see newspaper article for his ancestry).
Abigaila/Kapooloku/Kapoolohu/ Kapoholoku/ Poomaikelani/ Princess Poomaikelani was a hanai of Kakainalii (female) who married Kalaniulumoku, Abner Paki, and Kealoha.
Abigaila/Kapooloku/Kapoolohu/ Kapoholoku/ Poomaikelani/ Princess Poomaikelani was a hanai of Kaunuohua (female).
Abigaila/Kapooloku/Kapoolohu/ Kapoholoku/ Poomaikelani/ Princess Poomaikelani was also a daughter/hanai of Kaeha/Kamakaeha/Makaeha/Lydia/
Abigaila/Kapooloku/Kapoolohu/ Kapoholoku/ Poomaikelani/ Princess Poomaikelani's sister Queen Kapiolani was the hanai/adopted daughter of Kaluakini. Kaluakini later married Abigaila/Kapooloku/
There are many other family lines which is not listed here.
The following is additional evidence of Treason, Conspiracy by Charles Reed Bishop & Friends/Partners in Crime/Conspirators/Pirates/
The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, June 23, 1893, Image 6
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, June 23, 1893, Image 6
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, June 23, 1893, Image 6
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, June 23, 1893, Image 6
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
The above lists all who conspired against Queen Liliuokalani in 1893.
The most evil is Charles Reed Bishop who arrived in Hawaii with William Lee. Both worked for the American Consulate, then as an attorney, plantation owner, banker, etc.
Bishop was a "gold digger" marrying Bernice Pauahi Bishop who was Not the "last of the Kamehameha's".
The following article shows the "white race" in the Annexation count in 1893.
Both the Kamehameha School and Punahou School boys were taken in the count:
The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, May 08, 1893, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, May 08, 1893, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, May 08, 1893, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
The Daily bulletin. [volume] (Honolulu [Hawaii]) 1882-1895, May 08, 1893, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
SUMMARY
With the inclusion of Kamehameha Schools as part of the annexationists counts, this verifies the fact that the Kamehameha Schools was made for the purposes of adding supporters for the White Supremacist Charles Reed Bishop who was the "backbone" of the treasonous persons who helped to usurp Queen Liliuokalani in 1893.
It can be said that since 1893, Kamehameha Schools and Punahou Schools were the financed bodies of the White Supremacists whose purposes was to support the usurpation of Queen Liliuokalani, and utilized funds rightfully belonging to Queen Liliuokalani and the Royal Family.
Queen Liliuokalani was the hanai/adopted sister of Bernice Pauahi Bishop whose husband and friends orchestrated the theft of Hawaiian monies by organizing a "Trust" which criminally assumed lands of the Kamehameha's for their purposes leading up to the criminal assumption of lands, monies, etc. belonging to the Royal Family.
Therefore, it can be said that the Kamehameha Schools was a reason for the criminal pirates, pillagers, racketeers, a planned diversion to appear as if the education reason was for the children when it was really a scoundrel activity hiding the fact that the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees of 1884 were the true thieves, scoundrels, who helped to plan the usurpation of the Queen in 1893, and form a fraudulent trust in 1909 to assume all.
It is true what Judge Stuart observed:
Judge Stuart exposed the Corruptions in the Hawaiian Islands, in the claimed governments, and the courts, etc.............He complained about the usurpers to his President Wilson..............Wilson destroyed his letters by cutting it up and giving parts to those who were being written about.
Wilson threw his parts into the trash can.
Interesting man Judge Stuart....he bluntly admitted that the Bishop Estates was set up for the "real purposes of taking care of the trustees and hangers-on..."
Lastly, Charles Reed Bishop died in 1915. He left monies to many including Kamehameha Schools, and Punahou Schools.
Most of the monies was not his. He lost all interest in the Kamehameha's monies in 1893 due to his collusion, treasonous activities.
If that were not the case he would have lost all interest in1915 when he died and had only a life interest.
Rents are due from the Trustees of both trusts for lands criminally claimed by an illegal, criminal, pirate, pillaging, racketeering trust which owns nothing because they are not the allodial land owners, genocide activist, treasonous persons who have all breached the neutrality laws as well.
Reference:
http://amelia-gora.blogspot.
https://maoliworld.com/forum/
Nation to Nation Legal Directive/Notice to All No. 2022-0919 Cause for Investigations: Piracy/Corruption in Hawaii Affecting the U.S., State of Hawaii, Bankers, Wall Street etc. from Amelia Gora, a Royal Person, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, etc. - Kingdom of Hawaii
Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom Legal Notice No. 2017-0602 Oppositions to the entity State of Hawaii use of Haleakala, Maui, and Rents are Due; Oppositions remain for Maunakea, Hawaii, and Rents are Due; Oppositions remain for Hoopili, and all of Honouliuli, Ewa, Oahu, and Rents are Due; Oppositions remain for the Rail which is trespassing on Royal Families lands. Toll Fees, Rents are Due. This is Notice/Evidence No. 2017 - June 2 - Expanded Billings for Rents, etc. from Amelia Gora, Royal person, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, Royal Famtiily(ies) Trustee (one of), House of Nobles, Konohiki, Judicial Tribunal, Hawaiian Genealogical Society Representative, Konohiki Representative for Kamaikaaloa - Kula, Maui -Haleakala Konohiki; Assistant Minister of Interior affecting Maunakea - Hawaii; One of the five (5) Konohiki of Honouliuli - including Hoopili, Ewa, Oahu; Konohiki of Waimalu, Halawa, Kapalama, Downtown Honolulu - includes Iolani Palace and other specific properties owned by Private Property Owner Amelia Gora, et. als., and our Royal Families.
Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: The Lying, Hypocrite U.S. Presidents Documented for the Public Records
Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: The Big Liars - U.S. Presidents Who Perpetuated Fraud Claims to Annexation of Hawaii
Researched by Amelia Gora (2020)
All in the World were lied to about Hawaii being part of the United States.
The following U.S. Presidents are documented Liars and hypocrites who perpetuated Fraud Claims About the Annexation of Hawaii:
Note-
Liar legal definition of liar
TO LIE. That which is proper, is fit; as, an action on the case lies for an injury committed without force; corporeal hereditaments lie in livery, that is, they pass by livery; incorporeal hereditaments lie in grant, that is, pass by the force of the grant, and without any livery. Vide Lying in grant.
Hypocrites meaning
The Liars and Hypocrites are.........
25. William McKinley 1897-1901
26. Theodore Roosevelt 1901-190927. William Howard Taft 1909-1913
28. Woodrow Wilson 1913-1921
29. Warren Gamaliel Harding 1921-1923
30. Calvin Coolidge 1923-1929
31. Herbert Clark Hoover 1929-1933
32. Franklin Delano Roosevelt 1933-1945
33. Harry S. Truman 1945-1953
34. Dwight David Eisenhower 1953-1961
35. John Fitzgerald Kennedy 1961-1963
36. Lyndon Baines Johnson 1963-1969
37. Richard Milhous Nixon 1969-1974
38. Gerald Rudolph Ford 1974-1977
39. James Earl Carter Jr. 1977-1981
40. Ronald Wilson Reagan 1981-1989
41. George Herbert Walker Bush 1989-1993
42. William Jefferson Clinton 1993-2001
43. George Walker Bush 2001-2009
44. Barack Hussein Obama 2009-2017
U.S. President Trump Said that the U.S. Lied and Caused the Death of Millions and Now Moves to Make Corrections with Turkey's President https://iolani-
1969 - Secret about the claimed annexation of Hawaii revealed in a 1969 article releasing information from the Library of Congress after obtaining approval from U.S. Congress.
The information was released after 71 years which means Lies to the people was made by the United States.
Reference:
U.S. President Trump Said that the U.S. Lied and Caused the Death of Millions and Now Moves to Make Corrections with Turkey's President https://iolani-
IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: U.S. President Trump Said that ...
Review posted by Amelia Gora (2019) The following articles were posted
affecting the United States: 1) Pertaining to the Seizure of Hawaii, War with Spain, etc.: "Archives takes wraps off 1899 Senate transcript, Secret debate on U.S. seizure of Hawaii revealed" Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Vol. 58, No. 32, Saturday, February 1, 1969 Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: Important Articles Documenting ...
Amelia Gora About the United States: The following Lies are documented in the 1898 Senate transcript exposed in the article: "Secret debate on U.S. seizure of Hawaii revealed" (1) U.S. debate on whether to take over Hawaii occurred five (5) years AFTER taking over
1993 - U.S. President William Clinton perjured in Public Law 103-150 by saying that "President McKinley signed the Newlands Joint Resolution that provided for the annexation of Hawaii."
"Whereas, on July 7, 1898, as a consequence of the Spanish-American War, President McKinley signed the Newlands Joint Resolution that provided for the annexation of Hawaii;"
2000 - There was No Annexation/annexation of Hawaii.
Reference:
2014 - University of Hawaii at Manoa Law Professor Williamson Chang's research shows that there was no annexation and it was impossible for another nation to annex an independent, already recognized nation.
Reference:
NATION (2014); Williamson B.C. Chang, Federal Jurisdiction, 16 GOLDEN GATE U. L. REV. (1986); KEANU SAI, UA MAU KE EA-SOVEREIGNTY ENDURES: AN OVERVIEW OF THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL HISTORY OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS (2011 ); Keanu Sai, American Occupation of the Hawaiian State: A Century Unchecked, HAW. J. OF LAW AND POL. (2004).
- File Size: 399KB
- Author: Williamson B.C. Chang
- Page Count: 46
- Publish Year: 2015
8d609792b9c.pdf, Williamson Chang, “In Praise of Addison Bowman: The Ideal of Equality in the American Tradition in the Pacific” 18 University of Hawai‘i Law Review (1996) Williamson Chang, “The Wasteland in the Western Exploitation of Race and the Environment” 63 Colorado Law Review 849 (1996)
Williamson Chang, Do not Distribute or Quote without Permission Page 4 The Appendix to the Testimony of Williamson B.C. Chang April 16, 2015 “A Rope of Sand:” A Documentary History1 of the Failure of the United States to Annex the Hawaiian Islands Part I By Williamson Chang, Professor of Law University of Hawaii School of Law at Manoa
Williamson B.C. Chang
Professor of Law William S. Richardson School of Law University of Hawai‘i, Mānoa 2515 Dole Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822 September 17, 2014 Eric Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 FedEx Tracking Number 8061 7191 0836 IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: Williamson Chang's pdf for Mauna ...
BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES STATE OF HAWAI’I IN THE MATTER OF ) CASE No. BLNR-CC-16-002 Contested Case Hearing ) Re Conservation District Use ) WRITTEN DIRECT TESTIMONY Application (CDUA) HA -33568 ) OF WILLIAMSON B. C. CHANG for the Thirty Meter Telescope ) AS TO APPLICANT'S LACK OF at the Mauna Kea Science Reserve , ) TITLE TO THE SUMMIT Ka'ohe Mauka, …
2017 -
Updated: "The Doctrine of Political Question" Applies to All Land Cases.....Important, Mahalo Joyclynn Costa!
11 years ago on April 13th on a Friday myself and 3 others stood in front a Judge. We were accused of Criminal Trespass II reduced to Simple Trespass. The day we got arrested they put it on the 10 news about activist fighting for "Hawaiian" land. Wrong, we were standing for our rights and kuleana. After being looped in the system for months we had our day in court. The Prosecutor said if we could prove separation of jurisdiction and powers from both the State of Hawaii a...nd the United States the Judge could recognize our claim. Our point was they could not apply their authority on Hawaiian Nationals. There were 16 arrested that day. On April 13 on a Friday I delivered what the prosecutor requested. I handed the clerk, to hand to the Judge, a letter from the late Senator Inouye. He was a United State Senator for the State of Hawaii. (two birds w/ one stone) He could not come to our trial due to a mandated Constitutional Separation of Powers. I looked it up and found within the Separation of Powers was "The Doctrine of Political Question". In this doctrine it speaks of land if created by another Country can not be decided in court. It is of a political matter between the Executives. The Judge took a look at the letter asked a few questions flipped thru his books and accepted my oral motion to dismiss with prejudice. The prosecutor had nothing else to rebut and the Judge rendered a decision to grant the Dismissal with Prejudice. I know this was not of my doing but the grace of ke Akua that worked this case. You see we were not suppose to appear that because the case was already dismissed w/out prejudice. The Judge asked why our names were on the calendar and all they could say was it was a mistake. My dad stood with me and he had his say in court. A week later all others were also dismissed w/prejudice. All 16!!!! Since then we have lost a few of those warriors.2018 - Dr. Alfred deZayas documented that there was no annexation and the Hawaiian Kingdom exists:
Reference:
IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter to ...
May 09, 2019 · Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter to Routhe Bolomet - Important Keeper Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter, and the First Letter to Routhe Bolomet Validating the Existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom etc. posted by Amelia Gora (2019)
IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: Dr.Alfred DeZayas Exposes ...
Alfred Maurice de Zayas {born 31 May 1947 in Havana, Cuba), also known as Alfred de Zayas, is an American lawyer, writer, historian, a leading expert in the field of human rights and international law.
Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: Important Articles Documenting ...
May 09, 2019 · Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter, and the First Letter to Routhe Bolomet Validating the Existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom etc. posted by Amelia Gora (2019) GENOCIDE: 1893 SHARPSHOOTERS WHO KILLED KANAKA MAOLI REVEALED
This post has been posted for purposeful reasons.
aloha.
The Hawaiian Anthem by Queen Liliuokalani
- Like
- Reply
- Like
- Reply
- Remove Preview
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Great Britain & France - Stipulations of the Protectorate, etc.
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Great Britain & France - Stipulations of the Protectorate, etc.
Review by Amelia Gora (2024)
The following article shows the stipulations by Great Britain and France. They agreed to 'never take possession' of the Sandwich Islands/ Hawaiian Islands/Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom.
The United States; Great Britain; and France breached the Protectorate Treaty; the Neutrality Law, etc.:
The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, June 24, 1893, Page 2, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, June 24, 1893, Page 2, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, June 24, 1893, Page 2, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, June 24, 1893, Page 2, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, June 24, 1893, Page 2, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: https://
aloha.
************
facebook:
- Like
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- Like
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- Like
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- Like
- Reply
- Remove Preview
- Like
- Reply******
- Remove PreviewThe Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: More Piracy Evidence in the Kingdom of Hawaii by the U.S.
- Piracy Evidence -
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
from Facebook:
Alapaki Kim
· Waianae ·From my cousin Michael Kumukauoha Lee in response to the US Department of the Interior's attempt to finalise the attempted theft of Hawai‘i.HAWAIIAN KINGDOM LANDS OF THE GREAT MAHALE ARE WRITTEN IN HAWAIIAN BLOODLINES OF OUR MOKUAUHAU VIA "ANO ALODIAL TITLES:by Michael Kumukauoha LeeHawaii is seized lands neither Queen Lilioukalani nor the Hawaiian kingdom nationals willingly turned over their Allodial interest to their lands to the USA 2 Kue petitions spoke up to stop the Treaty of Annexation and only a lei remains today.SECOND LIE:The Newland's Resolution is illegal instrument to cede the Hawaiian Kingdom Crown lands to the USA so says the US Constitution Article 6 Section 2 the supremacy clause it is only the Executive Branch of government that can negotiate a treaty of Annexation for the US not the Legislative Branch.THIRD LIE:THE ADMITSSIONS ACT is a fraud.After World War II the United Nations was created. The UN set-forth the decolonization of all countries under the Empirical powers of other country's.The occupied Hawaiian Kingdom and the Hawaiian Kingdom nationals including kingdom national descendants not blood Hawaiian's"Kopae aina's" where to vote in a Pleb-aside to seek inclusion and absorption into the USA or separate self determination.The US failed to meet the demands of the UN Charter by allowing US citizens who where not the injured party and did not control the Hawaiian lands by Mahele Allodial titles to vote for Statehood and there was not the option two to vote for self determination.Many Kanaka's boycotted this vote.There fore the Hawaii vote for Statehood to the USA was a continuing fraud perpetuated not only on the Hawaiian Kingdom nations who never applied for US citizenship but where captured by the USA and given US citizen ship in 1900 to gain control over their Allodial titles going against the US Constitution of the 19th Amendment that you have to apply for US citizenship. another lie .The so called ADMISSION'S ACT DOCUMENT is a fraud:Article One Section One is strangely missing.Why?Because Article One Section One is suppose to articulate how legally the USA in a legal instrument justifies seizing the Hawaiian Kingdom lands under the UN charter mandate or International law or the US Constitutional law which it can not.Why?The USA has no legal instrumentality to claim the Hawaiian Kingdom Lands where legally ceded to the USA.So Hawaii became a giant TRUST like Bishop Estate.The U.S. became the Board of Trustees and the Hawaiian Kingdom National became beneficiaries of this FAKE STATE TRUST.This is spelled out in the HAWAII STATE CONSTITUTION ARTICLE ONE SECTION ONE;"We have the right to makes laws in the State of Hawaii because of the people."What people?No one can make laws unless they own said land and only Hawaiian's of the blood still have interest in their family allodial titles see Kumu Mike Lee's Allodial title classes on YOUTUBE.It is impossible under the "GREAT MAHELE a Foreign Allodial title to transfer the private or Hawaiian Kingdom Crown land in a Allodial title because Hawaii Allodial titles can only be transferred from Grantor to Grantee by having Hawaiian bloodlines in the Hawaiian genealogy.You must have a living Hawaiian of the blood to be able accept the Allodium and that is impossible if the USA is not a Hawaiian Nation of the Hawaiian blood lines.YOU HAVE TO HAVE A DROP OF HAWAIIAN BLOOD TO RECEIVE A ANO ALODIAL TITLE UNDER THE GREAT MAHELE.The interest of Ano Allodial is forever the way the Mahele laws where written and it can not be transferred as if it is fee simple or freehold or fee hold it is superior which Western Authors purposely overlook by quoting US allodial title law which had nothing to do with the HAWAII KINGDOM GOVERNMENT creation of Hawaiian allodial titles what so ever.The U.S. Federal Supreme Court dealt with Feign Allodial titles not created in the land boundary's of the USA in the US Federal Supreme Court case "Foster and Elam v. Neilson " 27 U.S.. 253 (1829).This case dealt with lands in Louisiana, New Orleans and the country the land was received from France west of the Mississippi through the treaty of Paris concluded between Great Britain, France, and Spain on February 10, 1763The case boiled down to this the United States Supreme Court rules that it has no control or possession, or control over FOREIGN ALLODIAL TITLES..The "Great Mahele is a Foreign Allodial title that the USA has no control or possession of since inception in 1847 and 1848, 1853 by US case president of the US Federal Supreme Court, and US Constitutional law ,and Hawaiian Kingdom law, and the UN Charter and international law.NO MATTER HOW MUCH LIPSTICK YOU PUT ON A PIG THE PIG IS STILL A PIG AS A LIE IS STILL A LIE THAT THE KINGDOM OF HAWAII WAS LEGALLY UNDER US CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW AND HAWAIIAN KINGDOM LAW CEDE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA."This fact was proved out by the US Justice Department memo in 1988, the U.S, Justice Department issued and advisory to the State Department in which the unconstitutional and illegal nature of the 1898 Newlands Resolution is quite clearly spelled out. The memo explains that the Senate rejected an annexation treaty that had been negotiated by President McKinley with the "Republic of Hawaii."In an effort to by-pass the treaty process, Sen Newlands of Navada sponsored a joint resolution of annexation. A Senate Foreign Relations Committee report, issued at the time, explained that the resolution relied on the annexation of Texas as a president. The Justice Department memo, however, points out a major difference between Texas and Hawaii,Because Texas was acquired as a new state, the joint resolution annexing Texas relied on the constitutional power of Congress to admit new states, and was not a proper precedent for annexing a land that would be retained as a possession or territory. In other words, annexation of Hawaii could not be achieved in a constitutional manner by a simple legislative act.The Hawaiian Islands were foreign soil in 1898, some 2,100 miles beyond U.S, territory, based on the international law principle of extraterritoriality, a U.S. joint resolution to annex Hawaii could not legally extend that far. The 1988 memo fails to identify any provisions in the U.S. Constitution or any principle in the international law which could have provided a legal basis for the United States to acquire Hawaii by a joint resolution.In fact, the memo says that during the annexation debates Congressman Ball characterized the effort to anex Hawaii by joint resolution as "a deliberate attempt to do unlawfully that which can not be lawfully done,"article appeared in The Honolulu Advertiser Sunday March 12, 2000 written by:Steven T. Newcomb is Director of Indigenous Law Institute.The more the U.S. Government and the Fake State Pushes in a illegal act the more the world will see that the phrase," American exceptionalism" is a lie a well. The United States criticized the Russian President for annexing part of the Ukraine illegally but the U.S. has done no difference to the harm and injury that in the "Apology Resolution of 1993" passed by Congress and signed by the U.S. President did not go far enough as the U.S. preaches to Russia to release territory illegally seized the U.S. Government should take it's own advice as well to release Hawaii to its rightful owners the Kingdom of Hawaii and its citizenry the Hawaiian Kingdom National if the US is truly what it says a"exceptional Nation.aloha.
***********The Legiitimate Government in Hawaii Series: More Piracy Evidence in the Kingdom of Hawaii by the U.S.
aloha.wtmm gaiu1908tJ1tca9a08nThe Legiitimate Government in Hawaii Series: More Piracy Evidence in the Kingdom of Hawaii by the U.S.
- Piracy Evidence -
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
from Facebook:
Alapaki Kim
· Waianae ·From my cousin Michael Kumukauoha Lee in response to the US Department of the Interior's attempt to finalise the attempted theft of Hawai‘i.HAWAIIAN KINGDOM LANDS OF THE GREAT MAHALE ARE WRITTEN IN HAWAIIAN BLOODLINES OF OUR MOKUAUHAU VIA "ANO ALODIAL TITLES:by Michael Kumukauoha LeeHawaii is seized lands neither Queen Lilioukalani nor the Hawaiian kingdom nationals willingly turned over their Allodial interest to their lands to the USA 2 Kue petitions spoke up to stop the Treaty of Annexation and only a lei remains today.SECOND LIE:The Newland's Resolution is illegal instrument to cede the Hawaiian Kingdom Crown lands to the USA so says the US Constitution Article 6 Section 2 the supremacy clause it is only the Executive Branch of government that can negotiate a treaty of Annexation for the US not the Legislative Branch.THIRD LIE:THE ADMITSSIONS ACT is a fraud.After World War II the United Nations was created. The UN set-forth the decolonization of all countries under the Empirical powers of other country's.The occupied Hawaiian Kingdom and the Hawaiian Kingdom nationals including kingdom national descendants not blood Hawaiian's"Kopae aina's" where to vote in a Pleb-aside to seek inclusion and absorption into the USA or separate self determination.The US failed to meet the demands of the UN Charter by allowing US citizens who where not the injured party and did not control the Hawaiian lands by Mahele Allodial titles to vote for Statehood and there was not the option two to vote for self determination.Many Kanaka's boycotted this vote.There fore the Hawaii vote for Statehood to the USA was a continuing fraud perpetuated not only on the Hawaiian Kingdom nations who never applied for US citizenship but where captured by the USA and given US citizen ship in 1900 to gain control over their Allodial titles going against the US Constitution of the 19th Amendment that you have to apply for US citizenship. another lie .The so called ADMISSION'S ACT DOCUMENT is a fraud:Article One Section One is strangely missing.Why?Because Article One Section One is suppose to articulate how legally the USA in a legal instrument justifies seizing the Hawaiian Kingdom lands under the UN charter mandate or International law or the US Constitutional law which it can not.Why?The USA has no legal instrumentality to claim the Hawaiian Kingdom Lands where legally ceded to the USA.So Hawaii became a giant TRUST like Bishop Estate.The U.S. became the Board of Trustees and the Hawaiian Kingdom National became beneficiaries of this FAKE STATE TRUST.This is spelled out in the HAWAII STATE CONSTITUTION ARTICLE ONE SECTION ONE;"We have the right to makes laws in the State of Hawaii because of the people."What people?No one can make laws unless they own said land and only Hawaiian's of the blood still have interest in their family allodial titles see Kumu Mike Lee's Allodial title classes on YOUTUBE.It is impossible under the "GREAT MAHELE a Foreign Allodial title to transfer the private or Hawaiian Kingdom Crown land in a Allodial title because Hawaii Allodial titles can only be transferred from Grantor to Grantee by having Hawaiian bloodlines in the Hawaiian genealogy.You must have a living Hawaiian of the blood to be able accept the Allodium and that is impossible if the USA is not a Hawaiian Nation of the Hawaiian blood lines.YOU HAVE TO HAVE A DROP OF HAWAIIAN BLOOD TO RECEIVE A ANO ALODIAL TITLE UNDER THE GREAT MAHELE.The interest of Ano Allodial is forever the way the Mahele laws where written and it can not be transferred as if it is fee simple or freehold or fee hold it is superior which Western Authors purposely overlook by quoting US allodial title law which had nothing to do with the HAWAII KINGDOM GOVERNMENT creation of Hawaiian allodial titles what so ever.The U.S. Federal Supreme Court dealt with Feign Allodial titles not created in the land boundary's of the USA in the US Federal Supreme Court case "Foster and Elam v. Neilson " 27 U.S.. 253 (1829).This case dealt with lands in Louisiana, New Orleans and the country the land was received from France west of the Mississippi through the treaty of Paris concluded between Great Britain, France, and Spain on February 10, 1763The case boiled down to this the United States Supreme Court rules that it has no control or possession, or control over FOREIGN ALLODIAL TITLES..The "Great Mahele is a Foreign Allodial title that the USA has no control or possession of since inception in 1847 and 1848, 1853 by US case president of the US Federal Supreme Court, and US Constitutional law ,and Hawaiian Kingdom law, and the UN Charter and international law.NO MATTER HOW MUCH LIPSTICK YOU PUT ON A PIG THE PIG IS STILL A PIG AS A LIE IS STILL A LIE THAT THE KINGDOM OF HAWAII WAS LEGALLY UNDER US CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW AND HAWAIIAN KINGDOM LAW CEDE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA."This fact was proved out by the US Justice Department memo in 1988, the U.S, Justice Department issued and advisory to the State Department in which the unconstitutional and illegal nature of the 1898 Newlands Resolution is quite clearly spelled out. The memo explains that the Senate rejected an annexation treaty that had been negotiated by President McKinley with the "Republic of Hawaii."In an effort to by-pass the treaty process, Sen Newlands of Navada sponsored a joint resolution of annexation. A Senate Foreign Relations Committee report, issued at the time, explained that the resolution relied on the annexation of Texas as a president. The Justice Department memo, however, points out a major difference between Texas and Hawaii,Because Texas was acquired as a new state, the joint resolution annexing Texas relied on the constitutional power of Congress to admit new states, and was not a proper precedent for annexing a land that would be retained as a possession or territory. In other words, annexation of Hawaii could not be achieved in a constitutional manner by a simple legislative act.The Hawaiian Islands were foreign soil in 1898, some 2,100 miles beyond U.S, territory, based on the international law principle of extraterritoriality, a U.S. joint resolution to annex Hawaii could not legally extend that far. The 1988 memo fails to identify any provisions in the U.S. Constitution or any principle in the international law which could have provided a legal basis for the United States to acquire Hawaii by a joint resolution.In fact, the memo says that during the annexation debates Congressman Ball characterized the effort to anex Hawaii by joint resolution as "a deliberate attempt to do unlawfully that which can not be lawfully done,"article appeared in The Honolulu Advertiser Sunday March 12, 2000 written by:Steven T. Newcomb is Director of Indigenous Law Institute.The more the U.S. Government and the Fake State Pushes in a illegal act the more the world will see that the phrase," American exceptionalism" is a lie a well. The United States criticized the Russian President for annexing part of the Ukraine illegally but the U.S. has done no difference to the harm and injury that in the "Apology Resolution of 1993" passed by Congress and signed by the U.S. President did not go far enough as the U.S. preaches to Russia to release territory illegally seized the U.S. Government should take it's own advice as well to release Hawaii to its rightful owners the Kingdom of Hawaii and its citizenry the Hawaiian Kingdom National if the US is truly what it says a"exceptional Nation.· Shared with Publichttps://iolani-theroyal.blogspot.com/.../the- legiitimate... info from Mike Lee (dec.) affecting the Kingdom of Hawaii and the Occupiers today........ share far and wide! 1LikeCommentShareAmelia Gorasharing Truth...............share with family and friends! Mike Lee's info affecting the Pirates documented............. e ala e https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BqZPLNoaos OFFICIAL Israel "IZ" Kamakawiwoʻole - "E ala E" Video ***********************OFFICIAL Israel "IZ" Kamakawiwoʻole - "E ala E" Video Home
News Feed posts
https://iolani-theroyal.blogspot.com/.../iolani-royal... U.S. Animosities over Palestine and the Kingdom of Hawaii1LikeCommentShare
The Drunken Sailor - Lyrics - Hurray and up she Rises! Sea shantyYOUTUBE.COMThe Drunken Sailor - Lyrics - Hurray and up she Rises! Sea shanty- Like
- Reply
- Remove Preview
No comments:
Post a Comment