The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Cease Fire Reason: NATO founded by Pirates Documented
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
Did you know that the NATO/ North Atllantic Treaty Organization was founded by Pirates documented?
"NATO’s essential and enduring purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of all its members by political and military means. Collective defence is at the heart of the Alliance and creates a spirit of solidarity and cohesion among its members."
"NATO’s goal: peace and security in Europe and North America."
"NATO strives to secure a lasting peace in Europe, based on its member countries’ common values of individual liberty, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. These shared values unite a diverse group of Allies on both sides of the Atlantic, and NATO embodies the transatlantic bond between them, whereby the security of Allies in Europe and North America is inextricably linked. The principle of collective defence – meaning that an attack against one Ally is considered as an attack against all Allies – is at the heart of NATO. This means that no single member country is forced to rely solely on its national capabilities to meet its essential national security objectives. The resulting sense of shared security among NATO members contributes to stability in the Euro-Atlantic area."
Problematic Issues
In the Treaty:
"
Article 10
The Parties may, by unanimous agreement, invite any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area to accede to this Treaty. Any State so invited may become a Party to the Treaty by depositing its instrument of accession with the Government of the United States of America. The Government of the United States of America will inform each of the Parties of the deposit of each such instrument of accession. "
Piracy Status of the United States, Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France
Since 1893, all three (3) Nations, the United States, Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France breached the Neutrality Law of Kamehameha III.
U.S. President Grover Cleveland reminded Americans of the violations of the Neutrality Law passed by Kamehameha III in 1854.
Because the United States promoted and engaged other nations in a unified effort called the NATO - which now has a membership of 32 Nations, it appears that the Nations are and remain unaware of the Pirate Status of the United States, Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France.
It appears that a Pirates Organization/Association has formed because the primary founder is the United States who have failed to inform everyone that they did have a part in plundering upon a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation called the Kingdom of Hawaii and engage in the occupation, piracy(ies) on lands, assets, mineral rights, water rights, and treat the kanaka maoli as lesser citizens because there was no Annexation and lies made over time.
The very claims made with the NATO organization is not applied to the occupied Nation called the Kingdom of Hawaii of which the U.S. are occupiers and have lied to the people, and others in the World over time.
See:
The NATO organization, therefore, was started by a Pirate Nation forming an organization to protect its Pirate activities in the International arena to gain sympathy for itself and the other Pirate Nations - Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France who have the Pirate Status since 1893 recorded.
Note:
"The United Kingdom (UK) is a country that consists of England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. The name Great Britain refers to the island on which most of the non-sovereign countries of England, Scotland, and Wales are situated. In casual use, the names Great Britain and Britain (and even sometimes England) are often used to refer to the UK even though Northern Ireland isn’t geographically part of the island of Great Britain.."
Reference:
https://www.dictionary.com/e/
A Pirate Created Organization called NATO
Because NATO was created by the United States, a Pirate status Nation, doesn't that mean all Nations joining the organization also gain the status of Pirates too?
NATO's 75th Anniversary
Antony Blinken, U.S. Secretary of State, spoke in Brussels, Belgium.
NATO's founding member countries were: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom and the United States.
- under NATO Shield.
12 Founding Members:
1) Belgium - 1949
2) Denmark - 1949
3) Canada - 1949
4) France - 1949 - Under the Pirate status since 1893
5) Iceland - 1949
6) Italy - 1949
7) Luxemburg - 1949
8) Netherland - 1949
9) Norway - 1949
10) Portugal - 1949
11) United Kingdom - 1949 - Under the Pirate Status since 1893
12) United States - 1949 - Under the Pirate Status since 1893
13) Greece - 1952
14) Turkiye - 1952
15) Germany - 1955
16) Spain - 1982
17) Czechia - 1999
18) Hungary - 1999
19) Poland - 1999
20) Bulgaria - 2004
21) Estonia - 2004
22) Latvia - 2004
23) Lithuania - 2004
24) Romania - 2004
25) Slovakia - 2004
26) Slovenia - 2004
27) Albania - 2009
28) Croatia - 2009
29) Montenegro - 2017
30) North Macedonia - 2020
31) Finland - 2023
32) Sweden - 2024
SUMMARY
Shall we inform the 29 nations that they have an organization that was started by documented Pirates since 1893?
Shall we inform them that the United States, Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France have had the Pirate status since 1893?
All three (3) Nations breached the Neutrality Law set in place by Kamehameha III from the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1854.
The following shows U.S. President Cleveland's Warning to Americans, followed by Kamehameha III's published Neutrality Law of 1854. Note that Kamehameha III documented that those Nations that breached the Neutrality Law are Pirates:
1896 - August 26. U.S. President Cleveland: Warned About a Military enterprise or Expedition = Breach of Neutrality
Reference:
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The U.S. is in Violation & Breached these Laws
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
The United States of America are occupiers, due to military invasion since 1893.
There was No Annexation meaning they have No Jurisdiction and are documented occupiers who have supported treasonous persons who were white annexationists/supremacists, the haters of people of color.
They are documented pirates as documented by Kamehameha III in his Neutrality law of 1854.
Indoctrinating everyone was the plan and through research the following are important evidence of their War Crimes, Genocide, Warring against our Neutral, friendly, non-violent, innocent people since 1893.
The following evidence is for all to know, be aware of because the U.S. is on record along with Great Britain and France in failing to following rule of law, including international laws:
The U.S. (and company) is In Violation/Breaches of the following laws:
1) Treaty of 1849 ratified in 1850 - Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America
"There shall be perpetual peace and amity between the United States of America and the King of the Hawaiian Islands, his heirs and successors"
Reference: http://punawaiola.
Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation and Extradition, 1849.
On December 20, 1849, the U.S. and the Kingdom of Hawaii signed a Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation and Extradition. The treaty, negotiated by U.S. Secretary of State John M. Clayton and the Hawaiian special Commissioner to the Government of the United States James Jackson Jarves, was signed in Washington, D.C.
****************************
2) Kingdom of Hawaii - Neutrality Law of 1854
" Privateering will be charged as Pirates - from Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli:
The goals of NATO is "common values of individual liberty, democracy, human rights and the rule of law" which is unlike the treatment of Occupied Kingdom of Hawaii since 1893.
Piracy of lands, assets, taxes, mineral rights, and water continues by the developers of the NATO organization who have hidden the truth from the World even today.
It is only right that the NATO organization disband or unify apart from the Pirate Nations: United States, Great Britain/United Kingdom, and France.
Issues remain unresolved, the occupiers have No Allodial land ownership and continue to plunder upon the kanaka maoli, and others in the Hawaiian Islands by wrongfully charging, and collecting taxes, etc.
The U.S. failed to follow rule of law and violates a peaceful, neutral, non-violent nation.
It is not O.K. to gain support of other nations and move to plunder upon other innocent nations as well.
Alignment with Pirates is not O.K., unlawful, and illegal.
Note: The handling of Pirates are unlike the operations of Normal Nations.
Research incomplete.
aloha.
********************
References:
Neutral Nation to Neutral Nations/Other Nations Legal Directive/Notice No. 2024 - 0502 About the Pirate Nations U.S., Great Britain, and France as documented for Breaching the Neutrality Law of 1854, etc. from Amelia Gora, a Royal Person, a Royal Family Representative, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, etc. - Kingdom of Hawaii
U.S. Laws on Piracy and Privateering/Prosecution of Pirates, etc.
CHAPTER 81—PIRACY AND PRIVATEERING
Historical and Revision Notes
In the light of far-reaching developments in the field of international law and foreign relations, the law of piracy is deemed to require a fundamental reconsideration and complete restatement, perhaps resulting in drastic changes by way of modification and expansion. Such a task may be regarded as beyond the scope of this project. The present revision is, therefore, confined to the making of some obvious and patent corrections. It is recommended, however, that at some opportune time in the near future, the subject of piracy be entirely reconsidered and the law bearing on it modified and restated in accordance with the needs of the times.
§1651. Piracy under law of nations
Whoever, on the high seas, commits the crime of piracy as defined by the law of nations, and is afterwards brought into or found in the United States, shall be imprisoned for life.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §481 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §290, 35 Stat. 1145).
§1652. Citizens as pirates
Whoever, being a citizen of the United States, commits any murder or robbery, or any act of hostility against the United States, or against any citizen thereof, on the high seas, under color of any commission from any foreign prince, or state, or on pretense of authority from any person, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §495 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §304, 35 Stat. 1147).
Words "Notwithstanding the pretense of such authority," were omitted as surplusage.
§1653. Aliens as pirates
Whoever, being a citizen or subject of any foreign state, is found and taken on the sea making war upon the United States, or cruising against the vessels and property thereof, or of the citizens of the same, contrary to the provisions of any treaty existing between the United States and the state of which the offender is a citizen or subject, when by such treaty such acts are declared to be piracy, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §496 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §305, 35 Stat. 1147.)
Minor change was made in phraseology.
§1654. Arming or serving on privateers
Whoever, being a citizen of the United States, without the limits thereof, fits out and arms, or attempts to fit out and arm or is concerned in furnishing, fitting out, or arming any private vessel of war or privateer, with intent that such vessel shall be employed to cruise or commit hostilities upon the citizens of the United States or their property; or
Whoever takes the command of or enters on board of any such vessel with such intent; or
Whoever purchases any interest in any such vessel with a view to share in the profits thereof—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §494 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §303, 35 Stat. 1147).
Reference to persons procuring or aiding was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "principal" in section 2 of this title.
Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.
The last sentence relating to venue was omitted as unnecessary in view of the general provision to the same effect in section 3238 of this title.
Minor changes were made in phraseology and arrangement.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000" in last par.
§1655. Assault on commander as piracy
Whoever, being a seaman, lays violent hands upon his commander, to hinder and prevent his fighting in defense of his vessel or the goods intrusted to him, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §485 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §294, 35 Stat. 1146).
A minor verbal change was made.
§1656. Conversion or surrender of vessel
Whoever, being a captain or other officer or mariner of a vessel upon the high seas or on any other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, piratically or feloniously runs away with such vessel, or with any goods or merchandise thereof, to the value of $50 or over; or
Whoever yields up such vessel voluntarily to any pirate—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §497 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §306, 35 Stat. 1148).
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000" in last par.
§1657. Corruption of seamen and confederating with pirates
Whoever attempts to corrupt any commander, master, officer, or mariner to yield up or to run away with any vessel, or any goods, wares, or merchandise, or to turn pirate or to go over to or confederate with pirates, or in any wise to trade with any pirate, knowing him to be such; or
Whoever furnishes such pirate with any ammunition, stores, or provisions of any kind; or
Whoever fits out any vessel knowingly and, with a design to trade with, supply, or correspond with any pirate or robber upon the seas; or
Whoever consults, combines, confederates, or corresponds with any pirate or robber upon the seas, knowing him to be guilty of any piracy or robbery; or
Whoever, being a seaman, confines the master of any vessel—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2527(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4877; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §498 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §307, 35 Stat. 1148).
Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" in last par.
1990—Pub. L. 101–647, which directed insertion of "section 11, 12, or 13 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act" after "consideration of any action brought under", could not be executed because the words "consideration of any action brought under" did not appear.
§1658. Plunder of distressed vessel
(a) Whoever plunders, steals, or destroys any money, goods, merchandise, or other effects from or belonging to any vessel in distress, or wrecked, lost, stranded, or cast away, upon the sea, or upon any reef, shoal, bank, or rocks of the sea, or in any other place within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(b) Whoever willfully obstructs the escape of any person endeavoring to save his life from such vessel, or the wreck thereof; or
Whoever holds out or shows any false light, or extinguishes any true light, with intent to bring any vessel sailing upon the sea into danger or distress or shipwreck—
Shall be imprisoned not less than ten years and may be imprisoned for life.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §488 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §297, 35 Stat. 1146).
Mandatory punishment provision in subsection (a) was rephrased in the alternative.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
§1659. Attack to plunder vessel
Whoever, upon the high seas or other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, by surprise or open force, maliciously attacks or sets upon any vessel belonging to another, with an intent unlawfully to plunder the same, or to despoil any owner thereof of any moneys, goods, or merchandise laden on board thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §489 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §298, 35 Stat. 1147).
Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
§1660. Receipt of pirate property
Whoever, without lawful authority, receives or takes into custody any vessel, goods, or other property, feloniously taken by any robber or pirate against the laws of the United States, knowing the same to have been feloniously taken, shall be imprisoned not more than ten years.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §552 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §334, 35 Stat. 1152).
Provision relating to concealment of pirate and words "is an accessory after the fact to such robbery or piracy" were omitted in view of definitive section 3 of this title.
§1661. Robbery ashore
Whoever, being engaged in any piratical cruise or enterprise, or being of the crew of any piratical vessel, lands from such vessel and commits robbery on shore, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §493 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §302, 35 Stat. 1147).
Transposition of several words was made.
https://www.un.org/depts/los/
Piracy Under International Law
Updated 24 May 2012
Introduction
Acts of piracy threaten maritime security by endangering, in particular, the welfare of seafarers and the security of navigation and commerce. These criminal acts may result in the loss of life, physical harm or hostage-taking of seafarers, significant disruptions to commerce and navigation, financial losses to shipowners, increased insurance premiums and security costs, increased costs to consumers and producers, and damage to the marine environment. Pirate attacks can have widespread ramifications, including preventing humanitarian assistance and increasing the costs of future shipments to the affected areas.
The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides the framework for the repression of piracy under international law, in particular in its articles 100 to 107 and 110. The Security Council has repeatedly reaffirmed “that international law, as reflected in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 (‘The Convention’), sets out the legal framework applicable to combating piracy and armed robbery at sea, as well as other ocean activities” (Security Council resolution 1897 (2009), adopted on 30 November 2009). Article 100 of UNCLOS provides that “[a]ll States shall cooperate to the fullest possible extent in the repression of piracy on the high seas or in any other place outside the jurisdiction of any State.” The General Assembly has also repeatedly encouraged States to cooperate to address piracy and armed robbery at sea in its resolutions on oceans and the law of the sea. For example, in its resolution 64/71 of 4 December 2009, the General Assembly recognized “the crucial role of international cooperation at the global, regional, subregional and bilateral levels in combating, in accordance with international law, threats to maritime security, including piracy”.
The Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, as the secretariat of UNCLOS, has a mandate to provide information and advice on the uniform and consistent application of the provisions of UNCLOS, including those relevant to the repression of piracy. It also has a mandate to provide information on relevant developments in oceans and the law of the sea to the General Assembly, as well as to the Meeting of States Parties to UNCLOS, in the annual reports of the Secretary-General on oceans and the law of the sea. These reports provide updated information on developments in respect of piracy and other crimes at sea.
“This Militaristic Approach Has Been a Failure”: Meet Hala Rharrit, First U.S. Diplomat to Quit over Gaza
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Neutral Nation to Neutral Nations/Other Nations Legal Directive/Notice No. 2024 - 0502 About the Pirate Nations U.S., Great Britain, and France as documented for Breaching the Neutrality Law of 1854, etc. from Amelia Gora, a Royal Person, a Royal Family Representative, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, etc. - Kingdom of Hawaii
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: U.S., Great Britain, and France Breaches Against the Kingdom of Hawaii Recorded and Remain Unresolved
- Piracy Recorded Since 1893 - Cases for the United Nations International Court of Justice, etc. -
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
The U.S., Great Britain, and France were documented Pirates in 1893 and their titles were disregarded /hidden or removed from the World to see.
The ongoing pursuit of funding others such as Israel, Ukraine has resulted in the U.S. denying the jurisdiction of the World Court to prosecute as War Crimes - Israel, etc.
It is important that everyone take a look at the historical wrongs documented in the Kingdom of Hawaii and recognize that the label of Pirates are to be maintained for the United States, Great Britain, and France who have funded others to Plunder Upon Innocents such as Palestine, and others.
Kamehameha III did document that nations who violated the Neutrality Law of 1854 were Pirates.
The United States, Great Britain, and France violated/breached the Neutrality Law, breached the Protectorate of 1854, violated their Treaties.
Also, the U.S. Constitution of 1787 was violated due to Article 6, the Supremacy clause because Treaties are the 'supreme law of the land'.
In 1893, the U.S. Junta made an agreement with Queen Liliuokalani saying that
all would be returned' if it was found that the U.S. had a part in her usurpation, etc.
The U.S. invaded Hawaii in 1893 as documented in the 1969 article in the Hawaii newspapers. See: Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Vol. 58, No. 32, Saturday, February 1, 1969
also see: https://maoliworld.com/
Therefore, the status of Pirates must be utilized for the three (3) Nations, the United States, Great Britain, and France.
The United Nations International Court of Justice must use the term of Pirates for the three (3) nations who are funding monies to plunder upon innocents including Palestine, etc.
The handling of Pirates becomes an issue other than viewing the nations as democratic, fair nations in the World today.
The U.S. are occupiers in Hawaii /the Kingdom of Hawaii without annexation, without jurisdiction and all taxes are pirated and funds Wars against innocent people who are unaware that Pirate Nations are supporting their enemies.
It is not O.K. to utilize monies, lands of a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation to plunder upon innocents in the World. Taxes are collected by a documented Pirate Nation who has done wrong to so many over time.
See: https://en.wikipedia.
Also see all the False Flag Operations that the U.S. has engaged in is shown as follows:
https://independentaustralia.
and https://www.
Kindly review the following information found in research because the U.S., Great Britain, and France have operated under a Pirates Flag since 1893:
The Kingdom of Hawaii Introduction:
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: "Religion and Morality is the first interest" - Kamehameha III
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: "Religion and Morality is the first interest" - Kamehameha III
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
Kamehameha III's first and foremost emphasis is on "Religion and Morality":
aloha.
Reference: Speech of 1848 by Kamehameha III.
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The Military Enterprise or Expedition and Piracies By the U.S., Great Britain, and France Evidence
- Evidence -
It appears that the following violations have been hidden from the public over time by pirate nations who have had a part in pirating lands, assets, taxes, etc. from the Kingdom of Hawaii.... these issues are posted for the World to see because the Hawaiian Islands are occupied by White Annexationists, Supporters/White Supremacists, Supporters who have animosities against the Hawaiian people/kanaka maoli/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina people who are people of color , also called "Niggers" or Indians even today (see " Niggers or Indians " article below):
U.S. President Cleveland's Warning to Americans exposed the Neutrality Law that was breached in 1896:
1896 - August 26. U.S. President Cleveland: Warned About a Military enterprise or Expedition = Breach of Neutrality
Reference:
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The U.S. is in Violation & Breached these Laws
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
The United States of America are occupiers, due to military invasion since 1893.
There was No Annexation meaning they have No Jurisdiction and are documented occupiers who have supported treasonous persons who were white annexationists/supremacists, the haters of people of color.
They are documented pirates as documented by Kamehameha III in his Neutrality law of 1854.
Indoctrinating everyone was the plan and through research the following are important evidence of their War Crimes, Genocide, Warring against our Neutral, friendly, non-violent, innocent people since 1893.
The following evidence is for all to know, be aware of because the U.S. is on record along with Great Britain and France in failing to following rule of law, including international laws:
The U.S. (and company) is In Violation/Breaches of the following laws:
1) Treaty of 1849 ratified in 1850 - Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America
"There shall be perpetual peace and amity between the United States of America and the King of the Hawaiian Islands, his heirs and successors"
Reference: http://punawaiola.
Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation and Extradition, 1849.
On December 20, 1849, the U.S. and the Kingdom of Hawaii signed a Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation and Extradition. The treaty, negotiated by U.S. Secretary of State John M. Clayton and the Hawaiian special Commissioner to the Government of the United States James Jackson Jarves, was signed in Washington, D.C.
****************************
2) Kingdom of Hawaii - Neutrality Law of 1854
" Privateering will be charged as Pirates - from Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli:
********************
3) Kingdom of Hawaii - Protectorate of 1854 by U.S., Great Britain, and France
December 8, 1854.
The last Public Proclamation made by His late Majesty King Kamehameha III.
PROCLAMATION.
Whereas, It has come to my knowledge from the highest official sources, that my Government has been recently threatened with overthrow by lawless violence; and whereas the representatives at my Court, of the United States, Great Britain and France, being cognizant of these threats, have offered me the prompt assistance of the Naval forces of their respective countries, I hereby publicly proclaim my acceptance of the aid thus proffered in support of my Sovereignty. My independence is more firmly established than ever before.
KAMEHAMEHA.
Keoni Ana.
Palace, 8th December, 1854.
By the King and Kuhina Nui.
R. C. WYLLIE
December 15th, 1854.
Reference: https://www.
****************
4) U.S. JUNTA
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: U.S. Bound to Contracts Recorded in 2023
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: U.S. Legally Bound to Contracts Recorded in 2023
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2023)
The following is a list of Legal Contracts that the U.S. is Bound to since 1843:
* 1843 - Recognition of the Kingdom of Hawaii as a Sovereign Nation
* 1850 - Ratified Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States
* 1854 - Protectorate by the U.S., Great Britain, and France.
* 1854 - Neutrality Law passed by Kamehameha III.
* 1883 - Postal Treaty with the U.S. completed. Savings were made by many and stolen.
* 1893 - Breach of the Stipulations of the Protectorate by the U.S., Great Britain and France.
* 1893 - Breach of the Neutrality Law by the U.S., Great Britain, and France.
* 1893 - Gold stolen.
* 1893 - Government monies stolen.
* 1893 - Crown Lands stolen by non-owners.
* 1893 - Government Lands stolen by non-owners.
* 1893 - Lands conveyed by non-owners.
* 1893 - Contract between Queen Liliuokalani and the U.S. Junta found.
See: https://iolani-theroyal.
"
/
MEANING OF THE U.S. Junta
- 1.a military or political group that rules a country after taking power by force."the country's ruling military junta"
- 2.HISTORICALa deliberative or administrative council in Spain or Portugal.
U.S. Junta Operations Documented
U.S.Junta - in Puerto Rico 1881 also in 1836, etc.
U.S. Junta - Hawaiian Islands 1893
See above............
Note: Looked for the article again at the chroniclingamerica website and it's gone! There were other articles before and the same happened..............missing.
******************
Reference:
This article shows that a Protectorate was given to the usurpers in 1896. This is evidence that the three (3) nations, the U.S., Great Britain, and France did breach the Treaties, the Protectorate, and the Neutrality law of Kamehameha III:
SUMMARY
It is important for everyone to know that the U.S. was bankrupt in 1893 and nearly out of gold.
The U.S. Representative had asked the Kingdom of Hawaii for a loan and the House of Nobles denied the request because the U.S. would not pay the loan back for thousands of years.
The Jews had loaned the U.S. monies expecting a 10% interest back, instead the Jews were killed in World War II and the loans? what became of the debts?
The U.S. funds genocide activists even today likened to the genocide activists in Hawaii who helped themselves to lands, monies, etc. based on piracies.
Funding wars at the expense of our peaceful, neutral, non-violent nation is not O.K.
Annexation claims are lies. Evidence has been uncovered that there was no Annexation, the entity created the U.S. President McKinley are documented Pirates supported by the U.S., Great Britain, and France who were parties too the crimes against a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation which happens to be people of color viewed as niggers and Indians.
Rule of Law Fail documented for entry into the International arena records showing hate crimes, genocide, war against peace, pirating activities which includes collection of taxes by non-owners who have No Annexation and are documented occupiers, the haters of people of peace, etc.
Research incomplete.
aloha.
Reference............more Evidence:
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: More Evidence, Five (5) More times of the U.S. Breach of the Neutrality Law Totaling 13 Times; The Failed Annexation - Another Perspective
Review of the Failed Annexation from
Pacific Strife by Kees Van Djik, Amsterdam University Press
For Evidence - Review by Amelia Gora (2021)
********************
1854
Protectorate over the Kingdom of Hawaii:
Friday, June 30, 2023
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Queen Liliuokalani Asked for a U.S. Protectorate on November 14, 1892; the U.S. Military Invaders Proclaimed a Protectorate over the Provisional Government
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Queen Liliuokalani Asked for a U.S. Protectorate on November 14, 1892; the U.S. Military Invaders Proclaimed a Protectorate over the Provisional Government on February 1, 1893
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2023)
************
Reference:
Thursday, June 29, 2023
The Legal Government in Hawaii Series: Great Britain and France Stipulations with the Kingdom of Hawaii
The Legal Government in Hawaii Series: Great Britain and France Stipulations with the Kingdom of Hawaii
- a Breach of the Stipulations -
Review by Amelia Gora (2023)
Ignoring Legal Stipulations by Nations does not mean that it will go away:
Note: Conspiracy within the Kingdom of Hawaii is documented in 1843 due to the failure of observing that both Great Britain and France had recognized the independence of a sovereign nation, the Kingdom of Hawaii.
The Minister of Foreign Relations/Affairs failed to point out to Kamehameha III that there was indeed a stipulation documented affecting the independence of the Kingdom of Hawaii, etc.
This also shows that the Minister of Foreign Affairs conspired against the Kingdom of Hawaii's Kamehameha III due to his failure of informing him that the Stipulation was in place since 1843.
Kamehameha III obtained a Three way Protectorate from the U.S., Great Britain, and France in 1854.
In 1893, the usurpers/Provisional Government gained the support of the United States on February 1, 1893. The United States removed the Protectorate from the already recognized nation known as the Kingdom of Hawaii, ignored Queen Liliuokalani's request of November 14, 1892..
This stipulation of 1843 remains legal, lawful, and to be held accountable.
It appears Great Britain and France breached their stipulations on record, etc.
It also appears that the United States, Great Britain, and France failed to follow the Protectorate signed with Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli in 1854.
The Breach of the Neutrality Law has been breached by the United States, Great Britain, and France in 1893. The Neutrality Law was passed by Kamehameha III - Kauikeauouli in 1854.
U.S. President Grover Cleveland in 1897 did remind Americans of the breach of the Neutrality. Law of 1854.
Research incomplete.
aloha.
Tuesday, February 27, 2024
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The Native Hawaiians or Kanaka Maoli Defined
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The Native Hawaiians or Kanaka Maoli Defined
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2024)
Alien occupiers claims Native Hawaiians/kanaka maoli are Niggers/Slaves or Indians :
The Independent. [volume] (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1905, August 06, 1897, Image 2
Conclusion:
Because there was No Annexation, the Natives of Hawaii do not have the same privileges of Americans and are to be compared with Niggers and Indians..
The Natives of Hawaii are to be treated as American Indians or Slave/Niggers because the entity State of Hawaii is a created government directed by U.S. President McKinley to be a territory of the United States "developed" by the U.S. Army, Navy, and others which was placed under the American Empire with other territories that had no Sovereignty.
The native Hawaiians, kanaka maoli are the legitimate people living and owning Allodial lands in the Kingdom of Hawaii, the Legitimate Royal Government in the Hawaiian Islands, the Hawaiian archipelago.
Kamehameha III in 1852 passed the anti-slavery laws which were disregarded by the white annexationists/white supremacists who moved against the Constitutional Monarchy government in Hawaii supported by the U.S. who failed to follow rule of law, the U.S. Constitution, the 1854 Protectorate, the 1854 Neutrality Law, and the agreement made by the U.S. Junta in 1893.
The entity created by the U.S. called the State of Hawaii has only a fractional sovereignty a 1/50 interest in the 100% sovereignty of the U.S. and is not a legal state, yet, the desire to call our Native Hawaiians/kanaka maoli "Niggers or Indians" continues on even today.
As the U.S. Junta had agreed with Queen Liliuokalani, if it was found that the U.S. had something to do with her usurpation, etc., then all shall be returned.
Evidence has been found, so therefore, all shall be returned.
Validation of the U.S. involvement can be obtained by downloading all articles of evidence posted on the internet for more than 10 years under the news on the web: IOLANI - the Royal Hawk, all articles by Amelia Gora, and other whistleblowers. Also pamphlets, books, articles written are also proof of the moves against a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation since the time of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli.
Queen Liliuokalani maintained the neutrality, non-violent, friendly status of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli.
aloha.
*************************
References:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: Important Articles Documenting Fraud, Conspiracies, Piracy, Pillaging by Aliens, Pirates, etc.
IMPORTANT ARTICLES TO KEEP
Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2020)
The following articles support all kanaka maoli today:
*Evidence of Premeditation to Take Over a Neutral, Friendly, Non-Violent Nation
1892 -
8 days before dethroning Queen Liliuokalani -
The Hawaiian Islands ARE NOT Part of the United ... - OpEdNews
https://www.opednews.com/
Jun 27, 2011 · Premeditation to Assume Pearl Harbor Coaling Station/the Hawaiian Islands - a Standing Order by Congress Eight (8) days BEFORE DETHRONING QUEEN LILIUOKALANI in 1893:
Author: Amelia Gora
Diary: WARS AGAINST THE WORLD ... - OpEdNews
https://www.opednews.com/
May 14, 2011 · 1) The Premeditation to assume Pearl Harbor, take over Pearl Harbor which has owners was made by a standing order of U.S. Congress and documented in the NEW YORK TIMES on January 9, 1893 or 6-7 ...
Author: Amelia Gora
*Story of Treason, Conspiracy - Princess Kaiulani, Bernice Pauahi Bishop and Charles Reed Bishop
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, August 02, 1895, Page 9, Image 9
Image provided by Library of Congress, Washington, DC
Persistent link: http://
Print this image | Download this image
*STORY OF PREMEDITATION, CONSPIRACY, PIRACY, PILLAGING, RACKETEERING ETC. SINCE the MISSIONARIES, U.S. PRESIDENTS SINCE 1840, ETC.
Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, March 27, 1897, Page 17, Image 17
Image provided by Library of Congress, Washington, DC
Persistent link: http://
Print this image | Download this image
* FOREIGNERS/Aliens - POLICE, SHERIFFS, STATE/City EMPLOYEES SUCH AS JUDGES, ETC. UTILIZING A FOREIGN ALIEN REGISTRATION, AND ANTI - BRIBERY
STATEMENT FOR THEIR PROTECTION
Foreign Agent Registration Statement & Anti-Bribery ...
https://iolani-theroyalhawk.
The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) is a United States law passed in 1938 requiring that agents representing the interests of foreign powers in a "political or quasi-political capacity" disclose their relationship with the foreign government and information about related activities and finances.
"
Monday, June 10, 2019
Foreign Agent Registration Statement & Anti-Bribery Statement - FAR Act of 1938 - Keep With your ID's, Passport, etc.
Adam Asing
June 6 at 8:17 AM
How to shut down the sheriffs, DHHL, HPD, National Guard, BLNR, DLNR, or just about any asshole that comes up the Mauna or ANYWHERE ELSE FOR WHATEVER REASON.
Oh and win every court case right out the gate.
No need to oli, haka, sing songs, or hand cuff yourselves with pvc pipes anymore. This will be easier. Very easy.
Simply demand to see their
Foreign Agent Registration Statement
& Anti-Bribery Statement in accordance to the Foreign Agent Registration Act of 1938.
Send them home to mama real fast."
Research by the Asings
*Hawaiian Kingdom SEIZED - INFORMATION HIDDEN AND RELEASED 71 YEARS LATER
1969
Amelia Gora About the United States: The following Lies are documented in the 1898 Senate transcript exposed in the article: "Secret debate on U.S. seizure of Hawaii revealed" (1) U.S. debate on whether to take over Hawaii occurred five (5) years AFTER taking over
IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: Pirate Eyes On Hawaii Series ...
iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.
"Archives takes wraps off 1899 Senate transcript, Secret debate on U.S. seizure of Hawaii revealed"
Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Vol. 58, No. 32, Saturday, February 1, 1969
The following are important excerpts of the above article:
"WASHINGTON (AP) - Now it can be told--what happened during the longest of three secret Senate cessions, during the Spanish-American War, a debate over whether to take over Hawaii."
"The debate of nearly three hours on that day - May 31, 1898 - and in two secret sessions the previous month had remained locked up until last week. Then at the request of a historian who noted gaps in the Congressional Record, the Senate passed a resolution authorizing the National Archives to take the wraps off the debate transcript."
"The government's only explanation for the long suppression of the debate records is that they had been long forgotten."
"THE SECRECY WAS clamped on during a debate over whether to seize the Hawaiian Islands - called the Sandwich Islands then - or merely developing leased areas of Pearl Harbor to reinforce the U.S. fleet iat Manila Bay."
"PEARL HARBOR, ALREADY UNDER LEASE, Stewart argued, wouldn't be much use until costly dredging operations opened the entrance channel. "Either we must have the Sandwich Islands," he declared, "or the administration must recall Dewey."
"THE UNITED STATES ANNEXED the Hawaiian Islands five weeks after that debate. But before the Senate reopened its doors that day, Morgan steered the discussion back to Cuba, the original cause of the war with Spain."
"The first secret session, April 25, 1898, involved technical and emotional debate over wording the declaration of war and why it or some accompanying resolution did not formally recognize the independence of Cuba or at least declare the Cubans to have the rights of belligerents in the conflict."
"THE SENATE ENDED UP BY ACCEPTING the House passed version reading that "war and the same is hereby declared to exist and that war has existed since the 21st of April" - four days earlier."
"Dropped from the final declaration was a Senate proposed tagline requiring the administration to "prosecute said war to a successful conclusion."
"Sen. Stephen White of California joined the unanimous vote for war "even with that mild prevarication" about when the war started."
**************
Note - The following Lies are documented in the above article:
U.S. debate on whether to take over Hawaii occurred five (5) years AFTER taking over
Hawaii, a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation in a planned move since 1840.
PEARL HARBOR WAS UNDER LEASE
ANNEXATION OF HAWAII WAS A LIE
WAR WITH SPAIN WAS MADE WITHOUT THE SENATE APPROVAL because War
started/existed "four days earlier"
* NO ANNEXATION MEANING THAT LIES AND FRAUD PERPETUATED OVER TIME
2000
* Recognizing Land Ownership in Hawaii
2011 -
* EVIDENCE OF A SEIZURE, PIRACY, PILLAGING, RACKETEERING, WITH NO AUTHORITY
2014 -
*NO ANNEXATION - EVIDENCE OF DECEIT, LIES PERPETUATED, FRAUD, CONSPIRACY FOUND
2015 - Three (3) PDF's:
[PDF]
Darkness over Hawaii: The Annexation Myth Is the Greatest ...
blog.hawaii.edu/aplpj/files/
NATION (2014); Williamson B.C. Chang, Federal Jurisdiction, 16 GOLDEN GATE U. L. REV. (1986); KEANU SAI, UA MAU KE EA-SOVEREIGNTY ENDURES: AN OVERVIEW OF THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL HISTORY OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS (2011 ); Keanu Sai, American Occupation of the Hawaiian State: A Century Unchecked, HAW. J. OF LAW AND POL. (2004).
File Size: 399KB
Author: Williamson B.C. Chang
Page Count: 46
Publish Year: 2015
[PDF]
1 Williamson B.C. Chang Professor of Law University of ...
www.law.hawaii.edu/files/
8d609792b9c.pdf, Williamson Chang, “In Praise of Addison Bowman: The Ideal of Equality in the American Tradition in the Pacific” 18 University of Hawai‘i Law Review (1996) Williamson Chang, “The Wasteland in the Western Exploitation of Race and the Environment” 63 …
[PDF]
Williamson B.C. Chang Professor of Law Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822
https://hawaiiankingdom.org/
Williamson B.C. Chang Professor of Law William S. Richardson School of Law University of Hawai‘i, Mānoa 2515 Dole Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822 September 17, 2014 Eric Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 FedEx Tracking Number 8061 7191 0836
File Size: 951KB
Page Count: 5
LAND OWNERSHIP WITH ROUTHE BOLOMET & University of Hawaii - Law Professor Williamson Chang
2019
2019 -
Important Letters from Dr. Alfred deZayas of the United Nations to Routhe Bolomet affecting All lands in the Hawaiian Kingdom, which never went away....
Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter to Routhe Bolomet ...
https://iolani-theroyalhawk.
May 09, 2019 · Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter, and the First Letter to Routhe Bolomet Validating the Existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom etc. posted by Amelia Gora (2019)
GENOCIDE: 1893 SHARPSHOOTERS WHO KILLED KANAKA MAOLI REVEALED
2020 - Entered onto the Judicial Tribunal List Applicable to the 1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States:
Nation to Nation Legal Notice No. 2020-0217 969 Pirates
Feb 18, 2020 - 2020-0217 969 Pirates, Pillagers Recorded Affecting the 1849/1850 Treaty of the ... 2020-0217 - 969 Persons/Entities Documented on the Judicial Tribunal List ... to Queen Liliuokalani Thrice (3x) researched by Amelia Gora, a Royal person, ... The Judicial Tribunal of the Hawaiian Kingdom/ Kingdom of …
The 50 Sharpshooter's names are included here:
Forty-First Session (41st) - List of eighty-two (82) persons/entities were added on the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/He Mokupuni Pae Aina o Hawaii/Hawaii
Tribunal dated February 17, 2020 with a Sub Total of eighty-two (82) persons/ entities documented guilty
******
No comments:
Post a Comment