Friday, May 21, 2021

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The Lorenzo Land Case and Williamson Chang, Representative

 

The following posts were made on Facebook.  The discussions below are posted for the purpose of showing how the entity created State of Hawaii dealt with kanaka maoli/Kanaka Hawaii Maoli over land titles.

Note that Title Guaranty documented that the State of Hawaii has No clear land titles as shown in the article below:


Also contrary to the State of Hawaii's claim that there was an Annexation, the following U.S. Supreme Court Memo shows otherwise:

 
 The following is a discussion on Facebook:

https://it-it.facebook.com/groups/2111058639035276/permalink/3066650180142779/?comment_id=3066682136806250

Hailama Ani ha condiviso un post.

7ftSd gtcehponenarifno sorcrf202eddh0ne 
Crooks

6ftSd gtcehponenarifno sorcrf202eddh0ne 
https://www.ilind.net/…/intermediate-court-of-appeals-agai…/
Appeals Court again rules against claim that annexation was illegal
Posted on January 4, 2020 by Ian Lind
On the morning of December 11, 2019, three judges of the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals convened in the Supreme Court Courtroom in downtown Honolulu to hear oral arguments in an appeal in the case of State of Hawaii vs. Windyceslau D. Lorenzo, also known as Kamehameha VI.
Yes, you read that right.
Since at least the early 1990s, Lorenzo has claimed to be “His Majesty Kamehameha VI, King of the Hawaiian Islands, seventh Great Grandson of Kamehameha I, duly recognized and confirmed by the Alii Nui Konohiki Council of Chiefs under the Constitution of 1840, in the Kingdom of Hawaii.”
Of course, despite the pretensions, he’s only one of many claimants competing to speak for a kingdom that in hard reality ceased to exist with the overthrow in 1893.
In 2013, Lorenzo filed warranty deeds in the Bureau of Conveyances transferring title to three parcels of Waimanalo land, a total of approximately 335 acres, to his wife. The source of Lorenzo’s ownership of the property was identified as an earlier 1998 deed:
Deed of Rose P. Lukela, “Grantor”, to Windyceslau Donato Lorenzo, dated August 26, 1998 and recorded at the Bureau of Conveyances as Document No. 98-126382, conveying all claims of the grantor in and to the lands of the Hawaiian Kingdom.
Lukela was also known as Rose P. Lorenzo. The basis of Lukela’s claim of ownership in the Waimanalo properties was not identified.
The state later challenged the 1998 deed in court and succeeded in having declared frivolous. It was expunged from the state’s records.
The state then challenged Lorenzo’s 2013 deeds, which were based on the on the deed that had already been throw out. Following a June 2015 hearing before Judge Victoria Crandall, title was found to be properly vested in the State of Hawaii. The three deeds were found to be frivolous and ordered to be expunged from the state’s land title records. In addition, Lorenzo was fined $5,000, and was enjoined from filing any further related deeds without prior authorization from the court.
Lorenzo then filed an appeal to the Intermediate Court seeking to reverse Crandall’s ruling.
Lorenzo was represented in this appeal by Williamson Chang, a professor at the University of Hawaii’s William S Richardson School of Law, who has become a widely quoted advocate of the theory that Hawaii was never legally annexed by the United States, one result being that therefore post-Kingdom land titles granted under the authority of the territory and state are invalid.
Chang had touted his opening brief in the appeal for its presentation of evidence of “the failure of the United States to acquire Hawaii….”
The judges of the Intermediate Court initially said oral arguments would not be held in the case, but Chang strongly objected. In a legal motion filed on September 30, 2019, Chang pressed the court to reinstate oral arguments because there were, in his words, “numerous issues that had not been covered.” Chang said he was prepared to address the legislative intent of the 1959 Admissions Act by which Hawaii became a state, as well as details of the Congressional debate over annexation in 1898.
In response to Chang’s motion, the court reversed itself, and on November 14 issued a notice setting the oral arguments for 10 a.m. on December 11. The stage was set for Chang to expound his theories.
But when the case was called, neither Williamson Chang or his client, Windyceslau D. “Kamehameha VI” Lorenzo, responded. Neither was present for the hearing that had been scheduled specifically at Chang’s request.
Less than two weeks later, the three-judge panel issued a summary disposition order rejecting each of the arguments raised by Chang and dismissing Lorenzo’s appeal.
The court found that the idea “that the 1898 Joint Resolution did not actually convey the islands of Hawaii to the United States, has been considered and rejected by the Hawaii Supreme Court,” citing the recent decision In re Conservation Dist. Use Application HA-3568.
https://law.justia.com/…/supreme-…/2018/scot-17-0000777.html
In that case, the Hawaii Supreme Court explicitly rejected Williamson Chang’s position that annexation was faulty because it was not accomplished through a treaty of annexation.
Citing relevant cases, the court held: “The United States Supreme Court has thus indicated that the process by which Hawaii was incorporated into the United States was lawful and binding, and we are bound by this determination.”
And as to the ownership of the Waimanalo parcels that were the subject of Lorenzo’s deeds, the court noted the history of the properties prepared by E. Mahoe Collins, the state’s abstractor, which traced the title back to the Great Mahele. The court noted that the history had not been challenged.
“Collins did not find any transfers or conveyances made by the State or its predecessors to Lorenzo or Rose P. Lukela (aka Rose P. Lorenzo), from whom Lorenzo claims he received transfer of the Parcels,” the court wrote in its decision. “Other than Lorenzo’s argument that the 1898 Joint Resolution failed to transfer the lands of Hawaii to the United States, which has been rejected by the Hawaii Supreme Court…he does not assert any challenge to Collins’s affidavit.”
Williamson Chang was ordered to pay $100 for his failure to appear for the December 11, 2019 oral arguments without good cause.
NEW HAWAIIAN - Kamehameha Lost!
FACEBOOK.ANYIMAGE.TOP
NEW HAWAIIAN - Kamehameha Lost!
Supreme Court rules the annexation of Hawaii was legal.
Commenti: 47
Condivisioni: 5
Mi piace
Commenta
Condividi

Commenti: 47

  • Jazzmin Cabanilla
    That's so disrespectful why would they post something like this? Even if they want to be recognized as Hawaiian Americans why would they create something so ignorant and dismiss their own mo'i so sad this kine
    8
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
    • Vee Santana Torres
      Jazzmin Mahinatea Because Kudo loves attention drawn to his hate group, New Hawaiian. He has deep issues.
      7
      • Condividi
      • 1 a
      • Modificato
    • Maka O Kalani Minihan
      Vee Santana Torres yes he does...borderline mental. He attempted other things, then found Ian Lind article as something to jump on to! Really sad
      3
      • Condividi
      • 1 a
    • Vee Santana Torres
      Maka O Kalani Minihan That guy is a former Star Bulletin writer. I think he writes for Civil Beat it now. They get boners on anti-Hawaiian rhetoric.
      5
      • Condividi
      • 1 a
      • Modificato
    • Hailama Ani
      Sista i was fuming ready to smash somebody
      2
      • Condividi
      • 1 a
    • Maka O Kalani Minihan
      Hailama Ani donʻt let these losers take your power - give it your ancestors. They all wanna beʻs! 😂
      6
      • Condividi
      • 1 a
    • Hailama Ani
      Oh yeah!! Rajah maka
      2
      • Condividi
      • 1 a
  • Maka O Kalani Minihan
    Losers without a purpose. I feel sorry for them, honestly.
    1
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Hau'oli Yockeman
    Looks like Iges look alike wants to be “bounded” just saying
    3
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Tutu Watson
    Does anyone know why the two folks didn't show up for hearing?
    2
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Cy K Mullen Sr.
    We Need The International Law and Rulings..Not Judged By False Representation Of Illegal Occupiers..Of Course They Gonna Rule Against Our Kingdom..AutoMatic!!! HEWA!!!!
    3
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Les Enriquez Rosehill
    Ryan Thompson (who runs Disruptarian Radio where he breeds hate for Hawaiians, and has announced running for county council 🙄) he lives in Puna for the last 3 years from America and is an affiliate with Ken Kudo and Lisa Malakaua.
    5
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Duane N Row
    Our lahui is better then these Hawaiians who chose too still listen too the haole and believe they are American brainwashed.
    But that's ok because they will all see when tbe mighty wave rises....
    7
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
    Frank Park ha risposto
     
    2 risposte
  • Kristal Wahine
    As the rest of the world leaders that already acknowledge that it was in fact illegal and is war crimes... this is irrelevant why would anyone further appeal or persue judicial process within the corrupt system that is admittedly and illegally responsible for the offence? Of course it was going to find a joint resolution a-okay and legal the judicial system is the roots and original offender... that's why we are not worried about criminals trying to exert illegal power thinking they are being fair and just to the Hawaiians cause the Supreme Court Ruling Said🤣.. international law supersedes the United States Corporate Corruption and Bullying tactics.. clown sad you trying to add confusions to the situation.. educate yourself you throwing statements around like a scholar but use the sense of a port-a-potty🤦🤙
    3
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • E Kaahui
    They didnt come against Kamehameha because Kamehameha would have died fighting and killing as many foreigners as possible.They came against our queen and extorted her into signing documents beyond her will.So they need to get that through their f@#kin heads especially the coconut kanakas.They should be killed for treason and betrayal of the Hawaiian Kingdom.Death to our enemies long live the Hawaiian Kingdom!!!!!!
    9
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • E Kaahui
    Pro Hawaii means pro Hawaiian no middle ground either you are for us in liberation and freedom of oppression or you are against us and chosen to be an enemy.
    9
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Frank Silva
    Wrong court
    6
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Alexander Kalauokalani Pea
    Who would win in a man to man fight? 7 foot tall Kamehameha... Who fought along side his own warriors and one his civil war on the battle field... who rumored to lift the 2 ton Naha stone... Or 6'3 243 Donald Trump who avoided the draft. Kamehameha would turn the Donald into Donald's Thumped.
    Id love to see these two in a UFC cage
    Ken Kudo you're such an antagonist. You better not hope Hawaii is never deoccupied because I have a feeling you're going to get voted off the island.
    The US won huh? Intresting because you know supporting the US in Hawaii is no different than supporting the US in Iraq. There were no lives being threatened when the USS Boston Landed... In Hawaii... And there were no weapons of mass distraction... When the US invaded Iraq...
    3
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
    E Kaahui ha risposto
     
    1 risposta
  • Ric Parish
    In America Slavery was legal. Until it wasn't. Banning women from voting was legal. Jailing interracial couples was legal. America and their cronies have had legal atrocities since its beginning. Fkk Amelika.
    3
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
    • Modificato
  • Elizabeth Sand Amen
    I love how they make a claim and say to click but you cannot actually see what it says without joining a private private group. Cowards to make a claim and not allow for rebuttal.
    1
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Tane Inciong
    A primary case of the fox guarding the henhouse syndrome. Wrong court. USA court will not rule against itself.
    This should be in a neutral court and under international laws and jurisdiction.
    3
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
    E Kaahui ha risposto
     
    1 risposta
  • Amelia Gora
    the entity State does Not have the court of "original jurisdiction".... The Hawaiian Kingdom Supreme Court has the original jurisdiction still…. https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/.../hawaiian...
    Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Legal Documents: Court of Original Jurisdiction - Researched Evidence by Amelia Gora (2019)
    IOLANI-THEROYALHAWK.BLOGSPOT.COM
    Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Legal Documents: Court of Original Jurisdiction - Researched Evidence by Amelia Gora (2019)
    Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Legal Documents: Court of Original Jurisdiction - Researched Evidence by Amelia Gora (2019)
    3
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Amelia Gora
    U.S. Supreme Court justices documented there was no annexation...
    Nessuna descrizione della foto disponibile.
    3
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Amelia Gora
    Joyclynn Costa documented that the Doctrine of Political Question shows that two (2) nations - U.S. and the Hawaiian Kingdom were part of her case...the judge released 15+ of kanaka maoli.. see: IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: Updated: "The Doctrine of ...
    Amelia Gora Mahalo..."Doctrine of Political Question" ... Joyclynn Costa Yes when you look at, especially developments they claim to own portions of LCA/RP according to the Doctrine it may appear to be with in the courts jurisdiction but it is not, It is of a political matter. 1.
    Updated: "The Doctrine of Political Question" Applies to All Land Cases.....Important, Mahalo Joyclynn Costa!
    IOLANI-THEROYALHAWK.BLOGSPOT.COM
    Updated: "The Doctrine of Political Question" Applies to All Land Cases.....Important, Mahalo Joyclynn Costa!
    Updated: "The Doctrine of Political Question" Applies to All Land Cases.....Important, Mahalo Joyclynn Costa!
    3
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
    Joyclynn Costa ha risposto
     
    4 risposte
  • Amelia Gora
    Joyclynn Costa
    · 22 hrs · … 
    Altro...
    Updated: "The Doctrine of Political Question" Applies to All Land Cases.....Important, Mahalo Joyclynn Costa!
    IOLANI-THEROYALHAWK.BLOGSPOT.COM
    Updated: "The Doctrine of Political Question" Applies to All Land Cases.....Important, Mahalo Joyclynn Costa!
    Updated: "The Doctrine of Political Question" Applies to All Land Cases.....Important, Mahalo Joyclynn Costa!
    5
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Angie Merola
    Why not we make our own courts...there is enough of us believe.. so why not.. what are we waiting for!!!🤙
    1
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • John Keohohina Jr.
    If Kamehameha was alive n Trump was looking at him like that he would have broke him in half n feedum to the mano MOKU O KEAWE 🔥 💪🏽
    1
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • John Keohohina Jr.
    Kekuhaupio would have smashed him before Kamehameha would get to him in loyalty n royalty MOKU O KEAWE 🔥 💪🏽
    2
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Frank Park
    Windyceslau Lorenzo
    1
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Vernal Stevens
    So if annexation is not necessary, why not use the joint resolution to force all countries with natural resources wanted by the US, to become states of the US Union. That way it will eliminate the need for war, there would be no cries for independence, native languages can be banned, religions can be converted to US preferences, US military can occupy huge areas of these countries and not have to pay for damages, you could even force them to pay taxes, AND. the US Supreme court would make it all legal. Don't think for a moment this is bullshit, they've done exactly that to Hawaii.
    3
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Amelia Gora
    btw we brought together the House of Nobles years ago, got sued by the entity State over the Crown Lands, found the actual deeds for the Crown Lands and the Government Lands, formed the Judicial Tribunal as instructed in land deed of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli --yep, instructions when there's problems, then found that the court of original jurisdiction remains in the Hawaiian Kingdom Supreme Court and no other...research, research, research....combined with Jocylynn Joyclynn Costa info, Williamson Chang's info, Routhē B Pololei, Mahelani Asing Kahau, Dr. Alfred deZayas of the U.N., and our reseach including the fact that the Hawaiian Kingdom never went away - see REX vs. BOOTH case, HAWAIIAN REPORTS, Supreme Court Law Library/ Archives/Main Library - you'll see that because the Kamehameha's are here means that the 2 parts of the 3 part Hawaiian Government never went away because the 2 parts are permanent parts and the 3rd temporary part were the ones who basically overthrew/dethroned the Queen..... now wondering what other contribution - positive parts have others done? have seen a lot of problematic issues that some at the "forefront" have been churning up out of their own doing, which has nothing to do with the rule of law....we also found that it is the Kamehameha's who are part of the contract/Treaty of 1850 with the United States and no other kanaka maoli included.....it is a permanent treaty of friendship and amity with the United States.....and the Supremacy Clause applies which states that "The constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound...." Reference: THE CONSTITUTION of the United States of America ISBN 978-1-55709-105 ...note: appears on the internet, there are tampered versions of the ...hmmm.. also recent research shows that the U.S. operates as two (2) nations: (1) United States - deals with nations and treaties and (2) the American Empire - deals with territories AND there are three (3) Constitutions for the U.S.: (1) Constitution of 1787 (2) 1871 - a secret constitution by the bankers and (3) 1980 constitution signed by U.S. President James Carter and Congress without the approval of the people... https://iolani-theroyal.blogspot.com/.../exposing-us...
    Remembering Queen Liliuokalani and Her Usurpers Today and Exposing the U.S. which operates two (2) Nations and three (3) Constitutions and Why Trump Cannot Be Impeached
    IOLANI-THEROYAL.BLOGSPOT.COM
    Remembering Queen Liliuokalani and Her Usurpers Today and Exposing the U.S. which operates two (2) Nations and three (3) Constitutions and Why Trump Cannot Be Impeached
    Remembering Queen Liliuokalani and Her Usurpers Today and Exposing the U.S. which operates two (2) Nations and three (3) Constitutions and Why Trump Cannot Be Impeached
    2
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Truth Highlighted from the Kamehameha Descendants/Heirs Representative Amelia Gora, Contributors: Williamson Chang, Dr. Alfred deZayas, Joyclynn Costa, Routhe Bolomet, Mahealani Asing Kahau's Relative Adam Asing, et. als.
    IOLANI-THEROYALHAWK.BLOGSPOT.COM
    Truth Highlighted from the Kamehameha Descendants/Heirs Representative Amelia Gora, Contributors: Williamson Chang, Dr. Alfred deZayas, Joyclynn Costa, Routhe Bolomet, Mahealani Asing Kahau's Relative Adam Asing, et. als.
    Truth Highlighted from the Kamehameha Descendants/Heirs Representative Amelia Gora, Contributors: Williamson Chang, Dr. Alfred deZayas, Joyclynn Costa, Routhe Bolomet, Mahealani Asing Kahau's Relative Adam Asing, et. als.
    1
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Amelia Gora
    Riproduci GIF
    Tenor
    1
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Kaulana Na Pua - I Ku Mau Mau
    YOUTUBE.COM
    Kaulana Na Pua - I Ku Mau Mau
    Kaulana Na Pua - I Ku Mau Mau
    2
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • John Keohohina Jr.
    ur pala pala sila nui ready that's what's winning in court today all by blood bloodline means Koko if your heirs to the Hawaiian kingdom kingdom of Hawaii you are valuable in the kingdoms eyes but ur are unvaluble in the fake states eyes know your gyniolgy really really important for the KANAKA MAOLI today we are lineal decadents with birth rites n ancestrial rites to the lands it's stamped.with HOA AILONA stamp and not no fake ass after 1893.bull shit robber stamp going work in court I not talking bout the fake ass courts im talking bout the world courts all by KEAKUA
    2
    • Condividi
    • 1 a
  • Frank Park
    Wait. What? So professor Chang requested a hearing for himself and his client, but never showed up for the hearing? Really? Why? Somebody lieing because this don't make sense.. Aloha all
    1
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)