The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: "NO ANNEXATION " EVIDENCE - 1897; 1898; 1969; 2000; 2015; 2018
The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: "NO ANNEXATION " EVIDENCE - 1897; 1898; 1969; 2000; 2015; 2018
Review by Amelia Gora (2022)
The following are Evidence found in researchshowing that there was No Annexation for Hawaii/theHawaiian Islands/Hawaiian Kindom/Kindom of Hawaii/Sandwich Islands:
1897 - ANNEXATION IS NOW DEAD FOREVER...
The following article supports the article "U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani" :
February 7, 1897. " Annexation temporarily suspended by President Cleveland, is now dead forever...." documented by Mr. Palmer. This article also supports the article that U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani.
The morning times. (Washington, D.C.) 1895-1897, February 07, 1897, PART 2, Page 9, Image 9
Image provided by Library of Congress, Washington, DC
Nov 08, 2020 · Review posted by Amelia Gora (2019) The following articles were posted affecting the United States: 1) Pertaining to the Seizure of Hawaii, War with Spain, etc.: "Archives takes wraps off 1899 Senate transcript, Secret debate on U.S. seizure of Hawaii revealed" Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Vol. 58, No. 32, Saturday, February 1, 1969
John Goemans' February 27th op-ed essay about the recent Supreme Court decision in Rice, rests on his core belief that what "was annexed to the United States in 1898 was the Republic of Hawaii." He further clarified this point by referring to the "annexation of that foreign nation to the United States." Unfortunately for Mr. Goemans, however, these comments are premised upon an erroneous article of faith rather than on historical legal fact.
In 1988, the U.S. Justice Department issued an advisory memorandum to the Department of State, in which the unconstitutional and illegal nature of the 1898 Newlands Resolution is quite clearly spelled out. The memo explains that the Senate rejected an annexation treaty that had been negotiated by President McKinley with the "Republic of Hawaii." In an effort to by-pass the treaty process, Senator Newlands of Nevada sponsored a joint resolution of annexation.
A Senate Foreign Relations Committee report, issued at the time, explained that the Newlands Resolution relied on the annexation of Texas as a precedent. The Justice Department memo, however, points out a major difference between the case of Texas and that of Hawaii. Because Texas was acquired as a new state, the joint resolution annexing Texas relied on Congress' constitutional power to admit new states. For this reason, says the memo, "the method of annexing Texas did not constitute a proper precedent for the annexation of a land and people to be retained as a possession or in a territorial condition," namely, Hawaii.
The right to annex the Hawaiian Islands by treaty was not denied at the time of the Newlands Resolution, the memo says. But it was denied that annexation could be achieved in a constitutional manner by a simple legislative act. The memo quotes a constutional law scholar as observing that "only by means of treaties...can the relations" between nations "be governed," for "a legislative act is necessarily without extraterritorial force." A legislative act, such as a joint resolution, is "confined in its application to the territory of the" nation "by whose legislature it is enacted."
The Hawaiian Islands were foreign soil in 1898, some 2,100 miles beyond U.S. territory. Therefore, based on the international law principle of extraterritoriality, a U.S. joint resolution to annex Hawaii could not legally extend there. The 1988 memo fails to identify any provision in the U.S. Constitution, or any principle in international law, which could have provided a proper legal basis for the U.S. to acquire the Hawaiian Islands as a territory by joint resolution. In fact, the memo says that during the annexation debates Congressman Ball characterized the effort to annex Hawaii by joint resolution as "a deliberate attempt to do unlawfully that which can not be lawfully done."
As Mr. Goemans notes in his essay, the Supreme Court said last month in Rice that the United States Constitution "has become the heritage of all the citizens of Hawaii." If only this had been understood a generation ago, he complains, before the creation of a whole universe of unconstitutional laws--state and federal--began." But as the Justice Department memo documents, the issue of unconstitutionality cuts Goemans' rhetorical legs out from under him, and directly contradicts the Court's claim.
The Justice Department memo enables us to arrive at a number of conclusions highly disturbing to the status quo. No annexation of the Hawaiian Islands ever legally occurred in 1898. The "Territory of Hawaii" was not established in 1900, despite congressional legislation purporting the contrary. The Hawaiian statehood vote was a sham attempt to hide the historical illegality that began in 1893, with full U.S. complicity. And, the Kanaka Maoli (indigenous Hawaiians), virtually all of whom opposed U.S. annexation, and most of whom did not become citizens of the so-called Republic of Hawaii, have never been rightfully subject to the constitution of the United States."
Williamson Chang * I. INTRODUCTION: ... Annexation of Hawaii was taken down in the fall of 2014 and replaced with the following notice to the public. This need for a revision of the history of
TO LIE. That which is proper, is fit; as, an action on the case lies for an injury committed without force; corporeal hereditaments lie in livery, that is, they pass by livery; incorporeal hereditaments lie in grant, that is, pass by the force of the grant, and without any livery. Vide Lying in grant.
Hypocrites meaning
Definition of hypocrite. 1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion. 2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings. —.
26. Theodore Roosevelt 1901-1909 27. William Howard Taft 1909-1913 28. Woodrow Wilson 1913-1921 29. Warren Gamaliel Harding 1921-1923 30. Calvin Coolidge 1923-1929 31. Herbert Clark Hoover 1929-1933 32. Franklin Delano Roosevelt 1933-1945 33. Harry S. Truman 1945-1953 34. Dwight David Eisenhower 1953-1961 35. John Fitzgerald Kennedy 1961-1963 36. Lyndon Baines Johnson 1963-1969 37. Richard Milhous Nixon 1969-1974 38. Gerald Rudolph Ford 1974-1977 39. James Earl Carter Jr. 1977-1981 40. Ronald Wilson Reagan 1981-1989 41. George Herbert Walker Bush 1989-1993 42. William Jefferson Clinton 1993-2001 43. George Walker Bush 2001-2009 44. Barack Hussein Obama 2009-2017
Note:
45. Donald Trump 2017 - Present is different from the rest of the U.S. Presidents because he admitted that the U.S. has lied and Caused the Death of Millions...etc.
The above U.S. Presidents 25-44 - U.S. Presidents William McKinley through Barack Obama Failed to follow the Rule of Law, International Laws, the 1787 U.S. Constitution, and the 1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States when it came to the Hawaiian Kingdom.
EVIDENCE DOCUMENTED THAT THERE WAS NO ANNEXATION
1969 - Secret about the claimed annexation of Hawaii revealed in a 1969 article releasing information from the Library of Congress after obtaining approval from U.S. Congress.
The information was released after 71 years which means Lies to the people was made by the United States.
Review posted by Amelia Gora (2019) The following articles were posted affecting the United States: 1) Pertaining to the Seizure of Hawaii, War with Spain, etc.: "Archives takes wraps off 1899 Senate transcript, Secret debate on U.S. seizure of Hawaii revealed" Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Vol. 58, No. 32, Saturday, February 1, 1969
Amelia Gora About the United States: The following Lies are documented in the 1898 Senate transcript exposed in the article: "Secret debate on U.S. seizure of Hawaii revealed" (1) U.S. debate on whether to take over Hawaii occurred five (5) years AFTER taking over
1993 - U.S. President William Clinton perjured in Public Law 103-150 by saying that "President McKinley signed the Newlands Joint Resolution that provided for the annexation of Hawaii."
"Whereas, on July 7, 1898, as a consequence of the Spanish-American War, President McKinley signed the Newlands Joint Resolution that provided for the annexation of Hawaii;"
2000 - There was No Annexation/annexation of Hawaii.
Reference:
2014 - University of Hawaii at Manoa Law Professor Williamson Chang's research shows that there was no annexation and it was impossible for another nation to annex an independent, already recognized nation.
NATION (2014); Williamson B.C. Chang, Federal Jurisdiction, 16 GOLDEN GATE U. L. REV. (1986); KEANU SAI, UA MAU KE EA-SOVEREIGNTY ENDURES: AN OVERVIEW OF THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL HISTORY OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS (2011 ); Keanu Sai, American Occupation of the Hawaiian State: A Century Unchecked, HAW. J. OF LAW AND POL. (2004).
8d609792b9c.pdf, Williamson Chang, “In Praise of Addison Bowman: The Ideal of Equality in the American Tradition in the Pacific” 18 University of Hawai‘i Law Review (1996) Williamson Chang, “The Wasteland in the Western Exploitation of Race and the Environment” 63 Colorado Law Review 849 (1996)
Williamson Chang, Do not Distribute or Quote without Permission Page 4 The Appendix to the Testimony of Williamson B.C. Chang April 16, 2015 “A Rope of Sand:” A Documentary History1 of the Failure of the United States to Annex the Hawaiian Islands Part I By Williamson Chang, Professor of Law University of Hawaii School of Law at Manoa
Williamson B.C. Chang Professor of Law William S. Richardson School of Law University of Hawai‘i, Mānoa 2515 Dole Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822 September 17, 2014 Eric Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 FedEx Tracking Number 8061 7191 0836
BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES STATE OF HAWAI’I IN THE MATTER OF ) CASE No. BLNR-CC-16-002 Contested Case Hearing ) Re Conservation District Use ) WRITTEN DIRECT TESTIMONY Application (CDUA) HA -33568 ) OF WILLIAMSON B. C. CHANG for the Thirty Meter Telescope ) AS TO APPLICANT'S LACK OF at the Mauna Kea Science Reserve , ) TITLE TO THE SUMMIT Ka'ohe Mauka, …
2017 -
Updated: "The Doctrine of Political Question" Applies to All Land Cases.....Important, Mahalo Joyclynn Costa!
11 years ago on April 13th on a Friday myself and 3 others stood in front a Judge. We were accused of Criminal Trespass II reduced to Simple Trespass. The day we got arrested they put it on the 10 news about activist fighting for "Hawaiian" land. Wrong, we were standing for our rights and kuleana. After being looped in the system for months we had our day in court. The Prosecutor said if we could prove separation of jurisdiction and powers from both the State of Hawaii a...nd the United States the Judge could recognize our claim. Our point was they could not apply their authority on Hawaiian Nationals. There were 16 arrested that day. On April 13 on a Friday I delivered what the prosecutor requested. I handed the clerk, to hand to the Judge, a letter from the late Senator Inouye. He was a United State Senator for the State of Hawaii. (two birds w/ one stone) He could not come to our trial due to a mandated Constitutional Separation of Powers. I looked it up and found within the Separation of Powers was "The Doctrine of Political Question". In this doctrine it speaks of land if created by another Country can not be decided in court. It is of a political matter between the Executives. The Judge took a look at the letter asked a few questions flipped thru his books and accepted my oral motion to dismiss with prejudice. The prosecutor had nothing else to rebut and the Judge rendered a decision to grant the Dismissal with Prejudice. I know this was not of my doing but the grace of ke Akua that worked this case. You see we were not suppose to appear that because the case was already dismissed w/out prejudice. The Judge asked why our names were on the calendar and all they could say was it was a mistake. My dad stood with me and he had his say in court. A week later all others were also dismissed w/prejudice. All 16!!!! Since then we have lost a few of those warriors.
2018 - Dr. Alfred deZayas documented that there was no annexation and the Hawaiian Kingdom exists:
May 09, 2019 · Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter to Routhe Bolomet - Important Keeper Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter, and the First Letter to Routhe Bolomet Validating the Existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom etc. posted by Amelia Gora (2019)
Alfred Maurice de Zayas {born 31 May 1947 in Havana, Cuba), also known as Alfred de Zayas, is an American lawyer, writer, historian, a leading expert in the field of human rights and international law.
May 09, 2019 · Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter, and the First Letter to Routhe Bolomet Validating the Existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom etc. posted by Amelia Gora (2019) GENOCIDE: 1893 SHARPSHOOTERS WHO KILLED KANAKA MAOLI REVEALED
Because there was NO ANNEXATION, that means the U.S. has NO JURISDICTION.
Also, the Kingdom of awaii/awaiian Kindom remains a full sovereign nation vs. the Provisional overnment - ad no sovereinty, turned into the Republic wic ad no sovereignty, turned to the Territory of the United States ten the Territory of awaii wic ad no sovereignty, ten made into a State wit 1/50 or sared sovereignty wit the other 49 states trou U.S. President Dwit D. Eisenowers Executive Order in 1959.
Know that the U.S. became two (2) nations: (1) American Empire - dealt with territories. The full sovereign nation the Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom was placed under this status along with some of the other islands captured under a non-treaty status and (2) the U.S. - dealt with nations that had treaties.
Note: There is a permanent friendship and amity which was signed and ratified by Kamehameha III in 1850 with U.S. President Zachary Taylor and U.S. Congress. The Supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution documents that Treaties are the supreme law of the land and Judges were also to comply. See article 6.
Also the U.S. breached the Neutrality law and assumed and occupied a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation, a fully sovereign nation through the military enterprise or expedition who supported the white supremacists, bigots, genocide activists, with animosities towards people of color, etc..
Jun 27, 2021 · Posted by Amelia Gora on June 27, 2021 at 1:47am in Politics View Discussions The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: More Evidence, Five (5) More times of the U.S. Breach of the Neutrality Law Totaling 13 Times; The Failed Annexation - Another Perspective
Sep 19, 2021 · Posted by Amelia Gora on September 19, 2021 at 1:48am in Politics; ... McKinley failed to follow U.S. President Grover Cleveland's return of Hawaii to Queen Liliuokalani and proceeded to breach the Neutrality Laws, and was a documented pirate and was a party to the pirates, pillagers, frauds, and thieves covered in Article XIV of the 1850 ...
Dec 26, 2021 · Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2021) The following was posted on Facebook: Rikki TorresPestana. t 5 D e c e m b e r 2 0 g 2 S 0 2 4 n c c s t f u c a t r ...
Mar 23, 2019 · john w. foster: loads of lies out of washington, d.c. As Secretary of State, Foster "helped direct the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy." Review by Amelia Gora (2018)
No comments:
Post a Comment