Tuesday, August 26, 2025

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Allodial Landowners/Generational Land Owners Manual

 The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  Allodial Landowners/Generational Land Owners Manual

            

                                                          by Amelia Gora (2025)                           


Introduction

 I.  Brief History

II.  Constitution of the Kingdom of Hawaii - a Constitutional Monarchy Government

III. Allodial Lands/ Generational Trusts for Kanaka Maoli Only; Less than Allodial Lands for Aliens

* Royal Patent/Grant No.

* Land Commission Award No.

* Survey

* Other Information


* Konohiki Lands 

* Survey

* Other Information


IV. Treaties; Protectorate Treaties; Neutrality Law

V.  United States Constitution - Supremacy Clause

VI..  Kingdom of Hawaii - Case Precedence also Applicable to Occupiers

Note:  Occupiers have to use the laws of the occupied nation - Both Kingdom of Hawaii Laws and International laws also supports the rule of law


The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Case Precedence for Allodial Lands, Fraud, Conspiracies, etc.

  

                  Updated CASE PRECEDENCE for Allodial Lands,                                                Fraud, Conspiracies, Etc.

 

                                         Researched and Updated by Amelia Gora (2025)


 

1.       Rex vs. Booth (1863) – Explanation of the Hawaiian Government

Reference:  REX vs. BOOTH , 1863, HAWAIIAN REPORTS pages 616-644


2.       Kekiekie vs. Dennis – No one can take your lands away applicable to Kanaka Maoli only - Kanaka Maoli who are documented Allodial Title owners /"Forever" Land Owners/Generational Trust Land Owners.  

Note:  Aliens could never own Allodial Titles and were assigned only 30 years, less than Allodial, freehold, Fee Simple, or Leasehold lands.

Reference:  KEKIEKIE vs. DENNIS, 1851, HAWAIIAN REPORTS pages 69-70


3.  Kepane vs. John Watson - Case similar to KEKIEKIE vs. DENNIS  except that it was not necessary to go to court.  The only documents necessary was your genealogy to the landowner, the Royal Patent, the Land Commission, and Survey.  For Grants, the Grant Number, and the Survey.

Reference:  Kepane vs. John Watson, Archives files, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.


4.       Iona Piikoi vs. Jona Kapena – Owner returned/occupied lands, case was closed

Reference:  IONA PIIKOI vs. IONA KAPENA, 1857, HAWAIIAN REPORTS

Pages 15-18


5.       Kalama vs. M. Kekuanaoa and John Ii, Guardians of Victoria Kamamalu – Evidence of ownership needed:  1) Genealogies to the original landowner; 2) Royal Patent - copies at Archives and Bureau of Conveyances 3) LCA/ Land Commission Awards - copies at Archives and Bureau of Conveyances and 4) Survey -see Archives - obtain copies at the Archives.  Note: if not at the Archives, see the Bureau of Conveyances.  

Reference:  KALAMA vs. M. KEKUANAOA AND JOHN II, Guardians of Victoria Kamamalu, HAWAIIAN REPORTS, 1859, HAWAIIAN REPORTS Pages 202-209

6.  The King vs. William Anderson and John Russell  - "Every fraudulent combination, mutual understanding, or concerting together of two or more, to do what is obviously and directly wrongfully injurious to another, is a conspiracy......and concerted together to defraud.....they were guilty."

Reference:   POLYNESIAN, January 25, 1851; also see HAWAIIAN REPORTS, 1851, Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.

7. The King vs. Kahumoku - The false, fraudulent alteration of a Royal Patent, deed, or other writing, the alteration being such as may tend to deceive and defraud any person, is equivalent to a forgery of such writing.  The jury rendered a verdict of guilty and sentenced.

Reference:  The King vs. Kahumoku, POLYNESIAN, January 25, 1851, HAWAIIAN REPORTS, Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.

8. Bankruptcy of Ching On and Co. - A Landlord's claim for rent is a lien on a bankrupt's estate, and has priority over ordinary debts.

Reference:  HAWAIIAN REPORTS, Volume 6, pages 287-288, Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.

9.       In Re Ah Ho, et. Al. – U.S. President “proclaimed” Hawaii to be a territory and assigns judges; judges to answer to him

Note:  U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani Twice (2x) – illegal on part of U.S. President McKinley

Reference:  IN RE AH HO, ET.AL., HAWAIIAN REPORTS, 1899, pages 654-667

10.       Peacock vs. Republic of Hawaii – U.S. became 2 nations/countries:  1)  American Empire (territories), 2)  United States – those with treaties (nations)  Note:  The U.S. treated Hawaii as a territory.

Reference:  PEACOCK vs. Republic of Hawaii, 1899, HAWAIIAN REPORTS, pages 27-54.


11.      In Re Title of Pa Pelekane Case – Identity Theft -  The Attorney General of the Territory claimed that the “territory is the successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii” note:  Only bloodlines of Kamehameha are the heirs and successors.

Reference:  IN RE TITLE OF PA PELEKANE, 1912, HAWAIIAN REPORTS, pages 175-192.

 

 

aloha.



                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUBTHMx1gRo


********

 The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  Kanaka Maoli Allodial Land Claims Do Not Need to Go to Court - See Case Precedence

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Case(s) Precedence of Allodial Lands in Hawaii - Forever Lands

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  Case(s) Precedence of Allodial Lands in Hawaii - Forever Lands


Guide to Reclaiming your Allodial Lands from the descendants of Kalola (w) next-of-kin

on record in the Probate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop:

     

                        Kanaka Maoli/Kanaka Hawaii Maoli " is Good Against All the World"

                                                       Review by Amelia Gora (2021)



Enter the following case precedence in your Allodial Land Case(s) which is why buyer's have to beware:

 

(1)

Polynesian. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu], Hawaii) 1844-1864, January 25, 1851, Page 146, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015408/1851-01-25/ed-1/seq-2/


(2)


Polynesian. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu], Hawaii) 1844-1864, January 25, 1851, Page 146, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015408/1851-01-25/ed-1/seq-2/

Polynesian. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu], Hawaii) 1844-1864, January 25, 1851, Page 146, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015408/1851-01-25/ed-1/seq-2/

Print this image | Download this image


Copy this article and enter it in cases if needed, and keep copies with your ownership documents.

More case precedence to follow.

The  Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina is the legitimate government in the Hawaiian Islands.


aloha.

 

\                                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUBTHMx1gRo

References:

HAWAIIAN REPORTS, 1851, Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.

POLYNESIAN Newspaper - as noted above.

IOLANI - the Royal Hawk news on the web, etc.

VII.  Kamehameha's Heirs of his body Research

 

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  A No Sovereignty Pretend Government vs.  The Legitimate Government in Hawaii, a Constitutional Monarchy GovernmentPosted by Amelia Gora on June 24, 2021 at 6:54pm in Politics

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  A No Sovereignty Pretend Government vs.  The Legitimate Government in Hawaii, a Constitutional Monarchy Government

                                                                          Review by Amelia Gora (2021)

The following shows 

A No Sovereignty Pretend Government:

1)  The Provisional government Government of the Hawaiian Islands

case IN RE SHELDON/In the Matter of the Application of G.C. Kenyon On Behalf of J.G.M. Sheldon for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Sheldon was the editor of the HAWAIIAN HOLOMUA newspaper who printed the near accurate story of the overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893.

Discussion of how long the Provisional government could last was also discussed.

The move to turn the Provisional government into a Republic was also discussed.

Note:  over the years, there appears that the file at the Archive became smaller.  There are kanaka maoli who certified the files.

There are a few who have the records who could probably be called to testify to the above.

Reference:  Habeas Corpus Case of Sheldon vs. The  Provisional Government of the Hawaiian Islands, HAWAIIAN REPORTS, 1893, Volume 9, Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.

The Provisional government was Not a recognized nation, and had no sovereignty.

2)  The Republic of Hawaii replaced the Provisional government.

The move to change the Republic of Hawaii to Territory of the United States can be seen in this case found in Volumes 11 and 12.

In Volume 12, Territories were possessions of the American Empire and not yet part of the United States.

The United States operated with Nations that had treaties.

The Republic of the United States turned Republic of Hawaii became 

The Republic of Hawaii was Not a recognized nation, and had no sovereignty.

Reference:  W.C. Peacock & Co. v. Republic of Hawaii, HAWAIIAN REPORTS, Volume 11 and Volume 12, 1898, Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii

3)  The Republic of Hawaii became the Territory of the United States then the Territory of Hawaii.

By President McKinley's Proclamation, he instructed the Republic of Hawaii's officers follow his instructions.

Reference:  In Re Ah Ho, et. al., HAWAIIAN REPORTS, Volume 11, 1899, Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.

4)  The Territory of Hawaii

"The Territories are but political subdivision of the outlying dominion of the United States  Their relation to the general government is much the same as that which counties bear to the respective States"....though strictly speaking there was no sovereignty in the Territory."

The Territory of the United States turned Territory of Hawaii was Not a recognized nation, and had no sovereignty.

Reference:  Mary A. Coffield v. The Territory of Hawaii, HAWAIIAN REPORTS, Volume 13, 1901, Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.

Note:  The Provisional Government, Republic of Hawaii, Territory of Hawaii remained an entity that was Not a Nation and had No Sovereignty.

From 1893 thru 1897 the Provisional government to Republic of Hawaii sat with no status, denied Annexation by U.S. President Grover Cleveland.

 

vs. The Legitimate Government in Hawaii:  The Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii

KUE Petition in 1897

Olelo Mua   |   "The 1897 Petitions Protesting Annexation" by Noenoe Silva

Begin browsing at first page

  • Hawaii, Women [Kona Hema, Kona 'Akau, Kohala, Waimea, Hamakua, Hilo, Puna, Ka'u]
  • Hawaii, Men [Kona, Hema, Kona, 'Akau, Kohala, Waimea, Hamakua, Hilo, Puna, Ka'u]
  • Maui, Women [Lahaina, Wailuku, Waihe'e, Waiehu, Waikapu, Honua'ula, Makawao, Hana, Honokohau]
  • Maui, Men [Lahaina, Wailuku, Waihe'e, Waiehu, Waikapu, Honua'ula, Makawao, Hana, Honokohau]
  • Molokai, Women [Kona, Halawa]
  • Molokai, Men [Pelekunu, Wailau, Kona, Halawa, Kalawao & Kalupapa]
  • Oahu, Women [Honolulu, Manoa, 'Ewa, Wai'anae, Waialua, Ko'olauloa, Ko'olaupoko]
  • Oahu, Men [Honolulu, Manoa, 'Ewa, Wai'anae, Waialua, Ko'olauloa, Ko'olaupoko]
  • Kauai, Women [Lihu'e, Koloa, Hanapepe, Waimea, Ko'olau, Hanalei, Kawaihau]
  • Kauai, Men [Lihu'e, Hanapepe, Waimea, Hanalei, Kawaihau]
  • Lists; Report of L.A. Thurston; Tables

and

Opposition to Statehood in 1959

Abel Cathcart supported by Mele Keawe Kauweloa opposed Statehood.

References:

1

  • kuepetitioncontinues.com/1897petitionagainstannex.html

    The 1897 Petition by the Hawaiian Patriotic League stands as evidence that the native Hawaiian people objected to annexation, but because the interests of the businessmen won out, over the coming decades most historians who wrote the history of Hawaii emphasized events as told by the Provisional Government and largely neglected the struggle of the Native Hawaiians.

1897 Petition Against Annexation

The 1897 Petition Against the Annexation of Hawaii ...

  • https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/hawaii-petition
    • Background
    • Resource
    • The Documents
    • When the Hawaiian islands were formally annexed by the United States in 1898, the event marked end of a lengthy internal struggle between native Hawaiians and white American businessmen for control of the Hawaiian government. In 1893 the last monarch of Hawaii, Queen Lili'uokalani, was overthrown by party of businessmen, who then imposed a provisional government. Soon after, President Benjamin Harrison submitted a treaty to annex the Hawaiian islands to the U.S. Senate for ratification. In 1897, the treaty ef…
    See more on archives.gov
    • Estimated Reading Time: 8 mins

SUMMARY

  • From 1897 to 1959 the Territory of Hawaii developed by the Army, Navy and other personnel directed by U.S. President William McKinley was illegally supported by the U.S. disregarding U.S. President Grover Cleveland's directions in 1893, 1894, and 1897 when he gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani.

    The U.S. under U.S. President William McKinley supported the "pretend" government and disregarded or breached the Neutrality Laws, disregarded the Treaty of 1850 between the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States, and disregarded International Laws.

  • The "pretend" government remained a non-state from 1893 through present day 2021.  The reason being that Oppositions were documented in 1897 by Queen Liliuokalani and her 40,000 subjects through 1959 when opposition to Statehood was made in 1959 by Abel Cathcart/ Harold Abel Cathcart supported by Kamehameha descendant Mary Keawe Kauweloa.

  • Summing it up, the period of 1893 through 1897 met with a roadblock of oppositions from Queen Liliuokalani and her 40,000 subjects (although only 21,000+ signatures were found); then in 1959 another roadblock of opposition to Statehood was made by Abel Cathcart/Harold Abel Cathcart supported by Mary Keawe Kauweloa, my maternal great grandmother.

  • In other words for 66 years 1893 to 1959 - there has been no sovereignty because territories do not have sovereignty.  

  • Then oppositions were also made in 1959 which means there is an illegal claim to sovereignty of 1/50 sovereignty, sharing the sovereignty of the U.S. as a nation by the Territory of Hawaii. 

  • The United States did breach the Neutrality laws as found in research and did fraudulently claim additional islands as Territories rightfully/legally belonging to the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii.

  • See:  

Minor Outlying Islands[edit]

  • The United States Minor Outlying Islands are small islands, atolls and reefs. Palmyra Atoll, Baker Island, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Atoll and Wake Island are in the Pacific Ocean, and Navassa Island is in the Caribbean Sea. The additional disputed territories of Bajo Nuevo Bank and Serranilla Bank are also located in the Caribbean Sea. Palmyra Atoll (formally known as the United States Territory of Palmyra Island)[112] is the only incorporated territory, a status it has maintained since Hawaii became a state in 1959.[16]

  • To date, there has been 128 years of Alien occupiers who have failed to follow rule of law, Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii laws, the 1850 Treaty of Amity and Friendship - Permanent Treaty, International laws, and breached the Neutrality law documented in research.

  •   The Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii never went away, which is also supported by the United Nations, Dr. Alfred de Zayas who documented that Hawaii is under "a strange form of occupation".

  • The Kamehameha's exists with ancestors living in the Hawaiian Islands/archipelago for more than 1,650+ years.

  • aloha.


VII.  International Laws 

Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter, and the First Letter to Routhe Bolomet Validating the Existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom etc.

                                                                   posted by Amelia Gora (2019)


Dr. Alfred DeZayas 1st Letter

Dr. Alfred deZayas wrote letters to Routhe Bolomet discussing the legal status of Hawaii and asserting that it is under a "strange form of occupation" by the U.S. These letters have been referenced by Amelia Gora in her discussions about the legitimacy of the Hawaiian Kingdom. maoliworld.com meanwhileinhawaii.org

Overview of Dr. Alfred deZayas' Letters to Routhe Bolomet

Dr. Alfred deZayas, a United Nations expert, has written three significant letters to Routhe Bolomet regarding the legal status of Hawaii. These letters address the ongoing debate about Hawaii's sovereignty and its historical context.

Key Points from the Letters

First Letter

  • Date: May 2018
  • Content: DeZayas discusses the legal governmental status of Hawaii, suggesting it is under a "strange form of occupation" by the United States. He emphasizes the importance of recognizing the Hawaiian Kingdom's existence.

Second Letter

  • Date: May 2019
  • Content: This letter reaffirms his previous statements and highlights the need for international recognition of Hawaiian sovereignty. DeZayas stresses the historical injustices faced by the Hawaiian people.

Third Letter

  • Date: Not specified
  • Content: The third letter continues to advocate for the rights of the Hawaiian Kingdom and critiques the legal frameworks that have led to its current status. It calls for a reevaluation of Hawaii's annexation and the implications of U.S. governance.

Context and Reactions

  • Historical Background: The letters are part of a broader discussion about Hawaii's annexation in 1898 and the subsequent legal and political ramifications.
  • Community Response: There is a mix of support and skepticism regarding the authenticity and implications of deZayas' letters, with some claiming they validate the Hawaiian sovereignty movement.

These letters contribute to the ongoing dialogue about Hawaii's status and the rights of its indigenous people.

 maoliworld.com meanwhileinhawaii.org


VIII.  Problematic Issues Found - 

*The Kingdom of Hawaii was Invaded Evidence;  

*The United States Secretary of State and U.S. Navy Paid Sanford B. Dole  for his part in the Planned Invasion ;

* NO ANNEXATION - LIES PERPETUATED BY THE UNITED STATES

 




* A FRAUD ENTITY DEVELOPED BY THE UNITED STATES; 


DISAPPEARED EVIDENCE: In the Matter of "Federal participation in territorial development" of Hawaii

Posted by Amelia Gora on April 30, 2016 at 8:32am in Politics

DISAPPEARED EVIDENCE:  In the Matter of "Federal participation in territorial development" of Hawaii

                                                                                     researched by Amelia Gora (2016)

What's with the Disappearing posts regarding the "Federal participation in territorial development" of Hawaii?

Incredibly, the articles posted disappears mysteriously.

So, the following are typed for your information and the References are posted below:

FORWARD WITH HAWAII!

Commemorating the

40th Anniversary

of Establishment of

TERRITORIAL GOVERNMENT

On January 1, 1940, The Star-Bulletin will publish a Pictorial Edition specially featuring Hawaii's industrial, political and social progress since territorial government was set up.

Hawaii's fight for equal rights---the campaign against discriminatory legislation or practice---will be emphasized.

This Anniversary Edition will be, further, a comprehensive review of island life and progress.

Army, Navy and other phases of federal participation in territorial development will be given much attention.

It will be an issue of vivid interest to the immediate reader, and of value as a source of information and reference........

and

Paragraph 3:

"Title to every inch of land was vested in the king by ancient feudal right, and when King Kamehameha III made a voluntary surrender of the land in 1848, it was an out and out gift to his people.  It marked the end of an era immemorially feudal, inaugurated the allodial era, and land became fee simple property for the first time in Polynesian history."

Note:

Kamehameha III shared not 'voluntary surrendered'.

Allodial/Alodio are titles given to Kamehameha III's subjects/kanaka maoli, and Not allodial era.  Referral to Fee Simple alone as land deeds in Hawaii shows a deliberate move to disenfranchise the true land owners of Allodial/Alodio titles.

The above articles shows the indoctrination of lies set up to defraud the true owners from the lands, and shows the planned development of the Territorial Government which criminally/pirated a neutral, friendly nation the Kingdom of Hawaii.

The use of the era in "allodial era" appears the beginning of the move to Equal Rights Amendment also known as ERA because of the highlighted "Hawaii's fight for equal rights --- the campaign against discriminatory legislation or practice---will be emphasized printed in the Preview to the 40th Anniversary of Establishment of TERRITORIAL GOVERNMENT" in the 1939 article.

Also note that the capitalization is used....the Territory of Hawaii appears to have been assumed as the TERRITORIAL GOVERNMENT, a Corporation entity due to the capitalization.

aloha.

References of 1939 and 1940:

Star-Bulletin/The Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Thursday, December 21, 1939 "....40th Anniversay of Establishment of Territorial Government", Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.

The Honolulu Star-Bulletin, January 1, 1940, 40th Anniversary of the Territory, Final Ed, January 1940, HSB 530 (roll), Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.

 

REFERENCES:

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)