Thursday, June 24, 2021

Nation to Nation Legal Notice/Advisory No. 2021-0624 - Documenting the Breach of Neutrality by the U.S. from Amelia Gora, Acting Liaison of Fooreign Affairs, House of Nobles member - Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii

 

  

 

 

U.S. President Biden
Secretary of State  
Governor David Ige
Honolulu Police Department
Interested Others

 Nation to Nation Legal Notice/Advisory No. 2021-0624 - Documenting the Breach of Neutrality by the U.S. from Amelia Gora, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles member - Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii

Greetings,

The U.S. has indeed breached the Neutrality Laws against the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii documented in the past and the recent present.

The evidence is shown below in this article.......Questions or Oppositions?  hwngensoc.akg@juno.com or goraamy69@gmail.com

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  Evidence of Breach of Neutrality by the U.S.

                                                      - A Military enterprise of Expedition -


                                                                                    Review by Amelia Gora (2021)


The following article shows that U.S. President Grover Cleveland warned Americans of the Neutral Nation status of the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii:


1896  - August 26. U.S. President Cleveland: Warned About a Military enterprise or Expedition = Breach of Neutrality 

The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, August 26, 1896, Page 4, Image 4

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1896-08-26/ed-1/seq-4/

Print this image Download this image

Background:

In 1892, the BOSTON was on assignment in the Hawaiian Islands based on the NEW YORK TIMES article which was posted nine (9) days before the overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani.

"

Pre-Spanish–American War (Caribbean, Mediterranean, Hawaii)[edit]

Boston, being the second cruiser of the New Navy completed, was not ready for active service until 1888. She then made a cruise to Guatemala and Haiti to protect American citizens.[9] She joined the Squadron of Evolution on 30 September 1889 and cruised to the Mediterranean and South America from 7 December 1889 to 29 July 1890, and along the east coast in 1891. Boston departed New York on 24 October 1891 for the Pacific via Cape Horn, arriving at San Francisco on 2 May 1892. Except for a prospective Pacific Squadron commanding officer's cruise to the Hawaiian Islands from 11 August 1892 to 10 October 1893 (in which she provided a shore party in January 1893 that bolstered the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy), she remained on the West Coast until laid up at Mare Island Navy Yard on 4 November 1893.[1] "


Reference:  https://www.bing.com/search?q=the+Boston+in+the+Hawaiian+Islands+in+1892&cvid=7c94aa8130a14fbabd6bb32c1f6e9c99&aqs=edge..69i57.18057j0j9&FORM=ANAB01&PC=HCTS

1893 - Premeditation which led to piracy(ies) on the high seas did occur and evidence has been found. The references follow: 

Mapping of the Pacific Ocean - Strategic Maps from the VALOR OF IGNORANCE by Lt. Homer Lea:


2) New York Times article, "Pearl Harbor Coaling Station - IMPERATIVE NECESSITY THAST THE UNITED STATES TAKE POSSESSION" dated January 8, 1893 and printed January 9, 1893 or eight (8) days before the dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani. 


 3) CHRONICLE OF AMERICA by Chronicle Publications, Mount Kisco, N.Y. article "U.S. ends coup in Hawaii" documenting that "Men from the cruiser Boston poured ashore on January 15 "to protect American lives and property," according to United States Minister John L. Stevens." This occurred two (2) days before the dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani. 


 4) The NEW YORK TIMES article, "The Story of a Crime" dated 6/21/1898 documents January 16, 1893 as the day that the troops landed "---three companies of bluejackets, one of artillery, one of marines, 154 men and 10 officers with 14,000 cartridges for rifles and the Gatling gun, 1,900 revolver cartridges, and 174 explosive shells for the revolving canon" was taken on land, a day (1) before the dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani. 

5)  American Civil War Generals (On Assignment) in Hawaii:

    1.  General Marshall

     2.  General Armstrong/General Samuel Armstrong

     3.  General W. H. Dimond

     4.  Walter Gresham

     5.  Alfred S. Hartwell

     6.  Carl Schurz

     7.  Robert E. Lee

      8.  General Schofield


6.  The Sharpshooters were given a U.S. Pamphlet with Instructions on What to Do, etc. by the U.S.

See:  U.S. Military Tactics Used by the Sharpshooters, etc.

The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, November 11, 1896, Page 6, Image 6

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015415/1896-11-11/ed-1/seq-6/

Print this image Download this image

The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, November 11, 1896, Page 6, Image 6

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015415/1896-11-11/ed-1/seq-6/

Print this image Download this image

The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, November 11, 1896, Page 6, Image 6

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015415/1896-11-11/ed-1/seq-6/

Print this image Download this image

7.  U.S. President William McKinley had the Army, Navy, and other personnel to develop the Territory of the United States in 1898 disregarding the facts that U.S. Grover Cleveland had given Hawaii back to Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, 1894, and 1897.

8.  The Booz and Allen Co. gave advice to the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees in 20  .  The Company works with the NSA/National Security Administration, the CIA/Central Intelligence Agency, etc.  Their former employee Sheldon is a Whistleblower who lives in Russia for asylum to avoid prosecution by the U.S. for releasing secrets, etc.

Background:  The Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees helped to plan the overthrow of King Kalakaua, Queen Liliuokalani in 1893.

The Trustees also helped to plan the overthrow in 1893.  Focus:  William O. Smith, Sanford B. Dole, Charles Reed Bishop, etc.

In 1909, William O. Smith, et. als. set up a Fraud Trust for Queen Liliuokalani.  The Queen denied signing a Trust with them and recorded it in her Will.

The monies fraudulently obtained is sent to the U.S. for stocks and bonds.  Approximately $14 million per year is collected from rents and sent the the U.S.


SUMMARY

With the military assistance in aiding the Pirates, pillagers, genocide activities, racketeering, the Trustees of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates have perpetuated the crimes since 1884 or the development of the Trust which benefited the White Supremacists, moving on to the overthrow of a neutral, friendly, non violent nation, and even assuming the Queen's lands, assets since the Fraud Trust was created in 1909.

Further assistance continued by the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees who sought the assistance of the company Booz and Allen who also works for the NSA/ National Security Administration, the CIA/Central Intelligence Agency which equates to ongoing military support for those who helped to breach he Neutrality laws documented by U.S. President Grover Cleveland in 1896.

As found and documented in research, the U.S. did indeed breach the Neutrality Laws and continue to breach the Neutrality Laws even today.

Prosecution of parties involved is due a three (3) year prison sentence.

In Hawaii, many are guilty and the prisons would be overflowing with White Supremacists including the Trustees of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates, the Liliuokalani Trustees, and other Alii Trustees.

Ramifications ongoing.


aloha.




References:  

PARASITES IN PARADISE: American Civil War Generals In the Hawaiian Islands Documented

PARASITES IN PARADISE


False Flag Operations: American Civil War Generals Operating In the Hawaiian Islands


                                                   researched by Amelia Gora (2017)
The following American Civil War Generals were found in the Hawaiian Islands:
1)  General Marshall
2) General Armstrong/General Samuel Armstrong
Reference:

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, January 02, 1892, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1892-01-02/ed-1/s...

Page 
3)  General  W.H. Dimond

Reference:

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, November 15, 1893, Image 5

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1893-11-15/ed-1/s...

Page 
4)  Walter Gresham
5)  Alfred Hartwell
6)  Carl Schurz
7)  Robert E. Lee
8)  General Schofield
SUMMARY
The above American Civil War Generals have been uncovered in the Hawaiian Islands. This is evidence of premeditation, conspiracies, piracy etc.
Research incomplete.


********

References:

https://demclubathr.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/overthrow.pdf

  • Diary: EVIDENCE: WHY THE ENTITY STATE OF HAWAII IS NOT …

    https://www.opednews.com/Diary/EVIDENCE-WHY-THE...

    Aug 19, 2011 · - Evidence of breach of Treaty under International laws by U.S. Military-1893 read articles, pamphlets, books, the IOLANI-The Royal Hawk by Amelia Gora 1893 - Queen Liliuokalani destroyed the ...

    • Estimated Reading Time: 8 mins
  • Diary: The Royal Families In The Hawaiian Islands and the ...

    https://www.opednews.com/Diary/The-Royal-Families...

    Jan 17, 2012 · -Other Evidence - see articles, pamphlets, books, the IOLANI - The Royal Hawk news on the web by Amelia Gora Queen Liliuokalani's supporters of 40,000 also opposed Annexation.

    • Estimated Reading Time: 6 mins
  • IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: Treason on Mauna Kea, and ...

    https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2017/10/...

    Jul 1, 2015 - I, Amelia Gora, deny that the State of Hawaii is the "successor of the ... or Why Defenders and Supporters of Mauna Kea, Haleakala Cannot Be Arrested ... I, Amelia Gora, am one of the land owners of Mauna Kea, ... The Treaty of 1850 - Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America article …

  • IOLANI - the Royal Hawk: Historical Evidence: Exposing ...

    https://iolani-theroyal.blogspot.com/2019/12/...

    researched by Amelia Gora (2019) The following article shows the relationship of U.S. President Cleveland to a treasonous person in Hawaii. ... The military buildup began in August of 1898 with the first army base in Waikiki called Camp McKinley. Today there are 118 military sites throughout the Hawaiian Islands and it serves as the ...

  • Liar Alfred S. Hartwell - U.S. Military Operative ...

    https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2018/06/...

    Aug 30, 2014 · Review by Amelia Gora (2018) The following article was written after an interview with General Alfred S. Hartwell, former attorney general of the Hawaiian Kingdom, former Judge who claimed that the Crown Lands belonged to the seat of office, contrary to law.

    • Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
    • IOLANI - the Royal Hawk: 2019

      https://iolani-theroyal.blogspot.com/2019

      Jan 30, 2020 · Researched by Amelia Gora (2019) The article below is very telling because the characters at play were keys in usurping Queen Liliuokalani in 1893. The list of characters follow: * U.S. Secretary John Foster. John Foster. 32nd United States Secretary of State. In office. June 29, 1892 – February 23, 1893.

    • IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: U.S. President Trump Said that ...

      https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/10/...

      Oct 17, 2019 · Review posted by Amelia Gora (2019) The following articles were posted affecting the United States: 1) Pertaining to the Seizure of Hawaii, War with Spain, etc.: "Archives takes wraps off 1899 Senate transcript, Secret debate on U.S. seizure of Hawaii revealed" Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Vol. 58, No. 32, Saturday, February 1, 1969

    • More on the American Civil War Generals:
    • American Civil War Losers and their Effects on Society Today or Historical and Inbred Anger Influencing Southern U.S. Presidents and Hawaii Since 1863

                                              American Civil War Losers and their Effects on Society Today

                                                                                      or

                                           Historical and Inbred Anger Influencing Southern U.S. Presidents
                                                                        and Hawaii Since 1863


                                                                                        Review by Amelia Gora (2017)


      Have you noticed how the Southerner's attitude plays a role in Society today and the moves to Plunder Upon Innocents in the U.S., Hawaii, and Abroad?

      The following excerpts about the Northern and Southern perspectives from a book REFLECTIONS AND COMMENTS written by Edwin Lawrence Godkin (1877) under the Chapter:  The South After the War, brought on curiosities leading to the idea that war losers in this case the American Civil War has been influential in Southern born U.S. Presidents attitudes when interacting with "People of Color":

      Godkin wrote:  "as one Southerner expressed it to me on my mentioning the change, "Yes, sir, we have been brought into intellectual and moral relations with the rest of the civilized world." All subjects are now open at the South in conversation.

      Is this true? it will probably be asked, with regard to the late war. Can you talk freely about that? Not exactly; but then the limitations on your discourse on this point are not peculiar to the South; they are such as would be put upon the discourse of two parties to a bloody contest in any civilized country among well-bred men or women. The events of the war you can discuss freely, but you are hardly at liberty to denounce Southern soldiers or officers, or accuse them of "rebellion," or to assume that they fought for base or wicked motives. Moreover, in a certain sense, all Southerners are still "unrepentant rebels." Doubtless, in view of the result, they will acknowledge that the war was a gigantic mistake; but I found that if I sought for an admission that, if it was all to do over again, they would not fight, I was touching on a very tender point, and I was gently but firmly repelled. The reason is plain enough.

      In confessing this, they would, they think, be confessing that their sons and brothers and fathers had perished miserably in a causeless struggle on which they ought never to have entered, and this, of course, would look like a slur on their memory, and their memory is still, after the lapse of twelve years, very sacred and very dear.

      I doubt if many people at the North have an adequate notion of the intensity of the emotions with which Southerners look back on the war; and I mean tender and not revengeful or malignant emotions. The losses of the battle-field were deeply felt at the North—in many households down to the very roots of life; but on the whole they fell on a large and prosperous population, on a community which in the very thick of the fray seemed to be rolling up wealth, which revelled as it fought, and came out of the battle triumphant, exultant, and powerful.

      At the South they swept through a scanty population with the most searching destructiveness, and when all was over they had to be wept over in ruined homes and in the midst of a society which was wrecked from top to bottom, and in which all relatives and friends had sunk together to common perdition. There has been no other such cataclysm in history.

      Great states have been conquered before now, but conquest did not mean a sudden and desolating social revolution; so that to a Southerner the loss of relatives on the battle-field or in the hospital is associated with the loss of everything else.

      A gentleman told me of his going, at the close of the war, into a little church in South Carolina on Sunday, and finding it filled with women, who were all in black, and who cried during the singing. It reminded one of the scene in the cathedral at Leyden, when the people got together to chant a Te Deum on hearing that the besieging army was gone; but, the music suddenly dying out, the air was filled with the sounds of sobbing.

      The Leydeners, however, were weak and half-starved people, weeping over a great deliverance; these South Carolinians were weeping before endless bereavement and hopeless poverty. I doubt much if any community in the modern world was ever so ruthlessly brought face to face with what is sternest and hardest in human life; and those of them who have looked at it without flinching have something which any of us may envy them.

      But then I think it would be a mistake to suppose that Southerners came out of the war simply sorrowful. At the close, and for some time afterward, they undoubtedly felt fiercely and bitterly, and hated while they wept; and this was the primal difficulty of reconstruction. Frequently in conversation I heard some violent speech or act occurring soon after the war mentioned with the parenthetical explanation, "You know, I felt very bitterly at that time." But, then, I have always heard it from persons who are to day good-tempered, conciliatory, and hopeful, and desirous of cultivating good relations with Northerners; from which the inference, which so many Northern politicians find it so hard to swallow, is easy—viz., that time produces on Southerners its usual effects.

      What Mr. Boutwell and Mr. Blaine would have us believe is that Southerners are a peculiar breed of men, on whom time produces no effect whatever, and who feel about things that happened twenty years ago just as they feel about things which happened a month ago.


      The fact is, however, that they are in this respect like the rest of the human race. Time has done for their hearts and heads what it has done for the old Virginia battle-fields. There was not in 1865 a fence standing between the Potomac and Gordonsville, and but few, if any, undamaged houses. When I passed Manassas Junction the other day there was a hospitable-looking tavern and several houses at the station; the flowers were blooming in the yard, and crowds of young men and women in their Sunday clothes were gathered from the country around to see a base-ball match, and a well-tilled and well-fenced and smiling farming country stretched before my eyes in every direction. The only trace of the old fights was a rude graveyard filled, as a large sign informed us, with "the Confederate dead." All the rest of the way down to the springs the road ran through farms which looked as prosperous and peaceful as if the tide of war had not rolled over them inside a hundred years, and it is impossible to talk with the farmers ten minutes without seeing how thoroughly human and Anglo-Saxon they are.

      With them the war is history—tender, touching, and heroic history if you will, but having no sort of connection with the practical life of to-day. Some of us at the North think their minds are occupied with schemes for the assassination and spoliation of negroes, and for a "new rebellion." Their minds are really occupied with making money, and the farms show it, and their designs on the negro are confined to getting him to work for low wages. His wages are low—forty cents a day and rations, which cost ten cents—but he is content with it. I saw negroes seeking employment at this rate, and glad to get it; and in the making of the bargain nothing could be more commercial, apparently, than the relations of the parties. They were evidently laborer and employer to each other, and nothing more."

      Reference:
      http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/7257/pg7257-images.html


      Highlighted Information or the Dynamics of Southern Attitudes

      "Southerners are a peculiar breed of men, on whom time produces no effect whatever, and who feel about things that happened twenty years ago just as they feel about things which happened a month ago."

      "Some of us at the North think their minds are occupied with schemes for the assassination and spoliation of negroes, and for a "new rebellion." Their minds are really occupied with making money, and the farms show it, and their designs on the negro are confined to getting him to work for low wages."

      "They were evidently laborer and employer to each other, and nothing more."


      Add the Southern States:

      "Eleven states left the United States in the following order and formed the Confederate States of America: South CarolinaMississippiFloridaAlabamaGeorgiaLouisianaTexasVirginiaArkansasNorth Carolina, and Tennessee."


      Add the U.S. Presidents Since 1861 (Confederate States of America formed) through 2017:

      Name of President                                              State Born In

      15. James Buchanan                                              Pennsylvania
      16. Abraham Lincoln                                            Kentucky
      17. Andrew Johnson                                             North Carolina                      Confederate State
      18. Ulysses S. Grant                                              Ohio
      19. Rutherford B. Hayes                                        Ohio
      20. James Garfield                                                 Ohio
      21. Chester A. Arthur                                            Vermont
      22. Grover Cleveland                                             New Jersey
      23. Benjamin Harrison                                           Ohio
      24. Grover Cleveland                                             New Jersey
      25. William McKinley                                            Ohio                          20th Century
      26. Theodore Roosevelt                                          New York - banking influence
      27. William Howard Taft                                        Ohio
      28. Woodrow Wilson                                              Virginia                              Confederate State
      29. Warren G. Harding                                            Ohio
      30. Calvin Coolidge                                                 Vermont
      31. Herbert Hoover                                                   Iowa
      32. Franklin D. Roosevelt                                         New York - banking influence
      33. Harry S. Truman                                                 Missouri
      34. Dwight D. Eisenhower                                       Texas                                  Confederate State
      35. John F. Kennedy                                                 Massachusetts
      36. Lyndon B. Johnson                                             Texas                                  Confederate State
      37. Richard M. Nixon                                               California
      38. Gerald R. Ford                                                    Nebraska
      39. James Carter                                                       Georgia                               Confederate State
      40. Ronald Reagan                                                    Illinois              
      41. George H. W. Bush                                             Massachusetts-lived in Texas Confederate State
      42. William J. Clinton                                               Arkansas                             Confederate State
      21st Century
      43. George W. Bush                                                  Connecticut -lived in Texas  Confederate State
      44. Barack Obama                                                     Kenya or Kingdom of Hawaii
      45. Donald J. Trump                                                 New York


      References:  
      https://www.whitehouse.gov/1600/Presidents
      bing.com
      other researches by Amelia Gora


      Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/Hawaiian archipelago 

      Pirates

      Charles Reed Bishop                                  Born In:  New York - banking influence
      William Little Lee                                      Born In:  New York - banking influence

      Governors Appointed by the U.S. President

      Sanford B. Dole                                           Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
      George R. Carter                                          Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
      Walter F. Frear                                             Born In:  California
      Lucius E. Pinkham                                       Born In:  Massachusetts
      Charles J. McCarthy                                     Born In:  Massachusetts
      Wallace R. Farrington                                  Born In:  Maine
      Lawrence M. Judd                                        Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
      Joseph Poindexter                                         Born In:  Oregon
      Ingram Stainback                                          Born In:  Tennessee                  Confederate State
      Oren E. Long                                                Born In:  Kansas
      Samuel Wilder King                                     Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
      William F. Quinn                                          Born In:  New York
      Elected by the People                                  
      William F. Quinn                                          Born In:  New York
      John A. Burns                                             Born In:  Montana
      George Ariyoshi                                          Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii
      John D. Waihee III                                     Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii

      Ben Cayetano                                              Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii
      Linda Lingle                                                Born In:  Missouri
      Neil Abercrombie                                       Born In:  New York
      David Ige                                                     Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii


      Note:  U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani Twice: In 1894 and 1897
      See:  http://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2017/11/overview-of-us-president-cleveland-gave.html

      U.S. President McKinley had the Army, Navy, and Federal personnel "develop" the Territory.
      U.S. President McKinley "Proclaimed" Hawaii to be a Territory of the U.S.

      In 1912, the Territory's Attorney General documented that 'the Territory is the successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii'.

      See:  Updating the ILLEGAL U.S. Documented in Hawaii -A Review- by Amelia Gora (2016)

      SUMMARY

      Hawaii became infiltrated with People of Color haters.

      Kamehameha III passed the anti-slavery law in 1852.

      The U.S. passed their anti-slavery law in 1865 or 13 years later.

      There were only a few word changes.

      The philosophies of the Confederate States were taken on by those arriving in Hawaii.

      It was the sugar planters of Hawaii who moved over to the Mexican's territory, then had the U.S. assist in claiming lands of the Mexicans.

      The territory was renamed Texas and they were part of the Confederate States who fought the Union Army.

      The attitudes taken on in the Hawaiian Islands and the U.S.:

      "Southerners are a peculiar breed of men, on whom time produces no effect whatever, and who feel about things that happened twenty years ago just as they feel about things which happened a month ago."


      "Some of us at the North think their minds are occupied with schemes for the assassination and spoliation of negroes, and for a "new rebellion." Their minds are really occupied with making money, and the farms show it, and their designs on the negro are confined to getting him to work for low wages."

      "They were evidently laborer and employer to each other, and nothing more."
    • also posted at:  https://amelia-gora.blogspot.com/2017/12/american-civil-war-losers-and-their.html
    • Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: Important Articles Documenting Fraud, ... Amelia Gora About the United States: The following Lies are documented in the 1898 ... GENOCIDE: 1893 SHARPSHOOTERS WHO KILLED KANAKA MAOLI REVEALED.
      Feb 18, 2020 — Hawaiian Kingdom Facts/EVIDENCE: Sharpshooters Pictures Revealed by Whistleblowers ... posted by Amelia Gora (2020) ... Articles were found showing U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani ...
      The Crown Lands make up nearly a million acres of lands which belonged to Kamehameha, his descendants and heirs. Since the premeditation moves by the ...
       Rating: 5 · ‎2 reviews
      Missing: Sharpshooters ‎articles
      Dec 6, 2020 — Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2020). The following article was printed in 1969 : "Archives takes wraps off 1899 Senate transcript, Secret debate on ...
      You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 6/11/21
      Oct 27, 2009 — 2009-0317 from Amelia Gora, a Royal person and Acting Liaison of. Foreign Affairs. I, Amelia Gora, am one of the owners of the Crown Lands because I ... New York Times article, "Pearl Harbor Coaling Station - IMPERATIVE ...
      4 pages
       
      Mar 6, 2010 — from Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, Amelia Gora. REASONS WHY ... Noted by author of the NEW YORK TIMES article, "The Story of a Crime":.
       
      The latest Tweets from amelia gora (@hwnwahine). One of Kamehameha's descendants, Researcher, author, ... proof posted - the Sharpshooters in Hawaii ...
       
      Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: Important Articles Documenting Fraud, ... Amelia Gora About the United States: The following Lies are documented in the 1898 ... GENOCIDE: 1893 SHARPSHOOTERS WHO KILLED KANAKA MAOLI REVEALED
      Feb 23, 2020 — The Photos shows the Sharpshooters who killed kanaka maoli and ... by Amelia Gora (2020) Articles John Foster -Directed the overthrow of ...
       

      Neutrality Act of 1794

      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      Jump to navigationJump to search

      The Neutrality Act of 1794 makes it illegal for an American citizen to wage war against any country at peace with the United States. The Act declares in part:[1]

      If any person shall within the territory or jurisdiction of the United States begin or set on foot or provide or prepare the means for any military expedition or enterprise ... against the territory or dominions of any foreign prince or state of whom the United States was at peace that person would be guilty of a misdemeanor.

      The act also forbids foreign war vessels to outfit in American waters and sets a three-mile territorial limit at sea.[2]

      The act was amended several times and remains in force.[3]

      Origins and evolution[edit]

      One reason for the act was to create a liability for violation of Section 8 of Article One of the United States Constitution, which reserves to the United States Congress the power to decide to go to war.[4]

      The Continental Congress previously had an alliance with France in 1778[5] that France accused the United States of violating with the 1794 American Jay Treaty with Great Britain. The French Ambassador to the United States, Edmond-Charles Genêt, had been actively recruiting American privateers for attacks on Spain and Great Britain, with whom the French Republican Government was at war.

      Some individuals in America were supporting the French Republican Government by engaging in privateering[6] and other Americans were engaging in filibuster military operations against British Canada and Spanish possessions in Florida and South America.

      This led to George Washington's Proclamation of Neutrality in 1793 and the act of 1794.

      The Act was used in the trials of Aaron BurrWilliam S. Smith and Etienne Guinet, who, with Frenchman Jean Baptist LeMaitre, were convicted of outfitting an armed ship to take part in France's war against Great Britain.[7]

      The Act of 1794 was superseded by the Neutrality Act of 1817[8] that included States that had recently become independent from Spain that were not mentioned in the original act.[9] Unrecognised governments such as "colonies, districts, or people" are given the same recognition as "states and princes" in the last clause of section 5.[10] Henry Clay called it "an Act for the benefit of Spain against the republics of America."[10]

      The Neutrality Act of 1817 also prescribes maximum penalties of three years imprisonment and up to a three thousand dollar fine.[11]

      The Act was updated again in 1838 during the 1837 Rebellions in Canada.

      The Neutrality Act was reenacted and amended several times since, and remains in force as 18 U.S.C. § 960.[12]

      Recent applications[edit]

      In 1981, nine men involved in Operation Red Dog were sentenced to three years in prison under the Neutrality Act; they had planned to overthrow the government of Dominica.[13][14]

      In the 2007 Laotian coup d'état conspiracy allegation, the US government alleged after a sting operation that a group of conspirators planned to violate the Neutrality Act by overthrowing the government of Communist Laos.[15] The United States Government has since dropped all charges against these defendants.

      In May 2016 four US residents were convicted of violating the Neutrality Act for their role in the 2014 Gambian coup d'état attempt[16]

      References[edit]

      1. ^ Kwakwa, Edward K. (1992). The International Law of Armed Conflict: Personal and Material Fields of Application. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 116. ISBN 0-7923-1558-8.
      2. ^ Kim, Sun Pyo (2004). Maritime Delimitation and Interim Arrangements in North East Asia. Martinus Nijhoff. pp. 225ISBN 90-04-13669-X.
      3. ^ Application of the Neutrality Act to Official Government Activities
      4. ^ Boyle, Francis A. (2007). Protesting Power: War, Resistance, and Law. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. p. 78. ISBN 978-0-7425-3892-4.
      5. ^ Cunliffe, Marcus; Kenneth W. Leish (1968). The American Heritage History of the Presidency. American Heritage Pub. Co.
      6. ^ Benton, Thomas Hart (1857). Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856: Dec. 5. 1796-March 3, 1803. D. Appleton. p. 126.
      7. ^ U S v. GUINET2 U.S. 321 (U.S. Supreme Court 1795).
      8. ^ Evans, Lawrence Boyd (1922). Leading Cases on International Law. Callaghan and Co.
      9. ^ Wheaton, Henry; Richard Henry (1866). Elements of International Law. Little, Brown & Company. pp. 439.
      10. Jump up to:a b Beamis, George (1864). Precedents of American Neutrality. The University of Michigan. p. 38.
      11. ^ May, Robert E. (2002). Manifest Destiny's Underworld: Filibustering in Antebellum America. University of North Carolina Press. pp. Chapter 1. ISBN 0-8078-2703-7.
      12. ^ Jules Lobel (1983), "The Rise and Decline of the Neutrality Act: Sovereignty and Congressional War Powers in United States Foreign Policy"Harvard International Law Journal24
      13. ^ "2 Guilty in New Orleans for Plot on Dominica Invasion"The New York Times, June 21, 1981
      14. ^ "Klansmen Get 3-year Terms", Boston Globe, July 23, 1981
      15. ^ Weiner, Tim (2008-05-11). "Gen. Vang Pao's Last War"The New York Times Magazine.
      16. ^ https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/four-americans-sentenced-failed-gambian-coup-n573371
      May 24, 2012 — Acts of piracy threaten maritime security by endangering, in particular, the welfare of seafarers and the security of navigation and commerce.
      International piracy law is international law that is meant to protect against piracy. It was enacted primarily by the United Nations and UNCLOS, and defines ...
      by T Treves2009Cited by 294 — The definition of piracy is rather narrow, as it includes only action on the high seas ...
      Any nation can arrest suspected pirates on the high seas—piracy is the oldest international crime—yet international law defines only the crime, not the penalty. As ...
      by L Azubuike2009Cited by 106 — Azubuike, Lawrence (2009) "International Law Regime Against Piracy," Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law: Vol. 15: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at:​ ...
      by D GuilfoyleCited by 3 — international law sense. From 2003-2004 onward, there was a significant increase in pirate attacks off Somalia. This form of piracy focused on hijacking vessels ...
      15 pages
      Oct 7, 2020 — The volatile humanitarian crisis in Somalia allows more and more citizens to conduct acts of piracy and this makes it almost impossible to enforce ...
      by D Chang2010Cited by 29 — This Note analyzes the current international legal framework for the punishment and prosecution of maritime piracyPiracy is an international problem that ...
      Maritime Piracy is a crime under international law, although in order to meet the criteria set out by UNCLOS Article 101, the attack needs to occur on the high ...  
      The definition of the crime of genocide as contained in Article II of the Genocide Convention was the result of a negotiating process and reflects the compromise ...
      The Genocide Convention was the first human rights treaty adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 9 December 1948 and signified the ...
      7(3); Krstic, ICTY, Appellate Judgment § 140]. Genocidal intent requires that acts must be committed against members of a group specifically because they belong ...
      (a) Basic Offense.—Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, ...
      The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG), or Genocide Convention, is an international treaty that criminalizes ...
      Signed: 9 December 1948
      Parties: 152 (complete list‎)‎
      Signatories: 39
      Effective: 12 January 1951
      In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious ...
      In her first address to the UN Human Rights Council in September 2008, High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay informed the Council that she will be​ ...
      by WA SchabasCited by 35 — This article discusses genocide as a legal concept. The crime of genocide has been incorporated within the national legal systems of many countries, where ...
      Mar 11, 2021 — Genocide is among the gravest crimes against humanity, but there is debate over which historical crimes qualify.
      '' Following the mass atrocities committed before and during World War II, the international community sought to condemn genocide. The slaughtering of ...



    • The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  Evidence of Breach of Neutrality by the U.S.

                                                            - A Military enterprise of Expedition -


                                                                                          Review by Amelia Gora (2021)


      The following article shows that U.S. President Grover Cleveland warned Americans of the Neutral Nation status of the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii:


      1896  - August 26. U.S. President Cleveland: Warned About a Military enterprise or Expedition = Breach of Neutrality 

      The Pacific commercial advertiser. [volume] (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, August 26, 1896, Page 4, Image 4

      Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

      Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1896-08-26/ed-1/seq-4/

      Print this image Download this image

      Background:

      In 1892, the BOSTON was on assignment in the Hawaiian Islands based on the NEW YORK TIMES article which was posted nine (9) days before the overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani.

      "

      Pre-Spanish–American War (Caribbean, Mediterranean, Hawaii)[edit]

      Boston, being the second cruiser of the New Navy completed, was not ready for active service until 1888. She then made a cruise to Guatemala and Haiti to protect American citizens.[9] She joined the Squadron of Evolution on 30 September 1889 and cruised to the Mediterranean and South America from 7 December 1889 to 29 July 1890, and along the east coast in 1891. Boston departed New York on 24 October 1891 for the Pacific via Cape Horn, arriving at San Francisco on 2 May 1892. Except for a prospective Pacific Squadron commanding officer's cruise to the Hawaiian Islands from 11 August 1892 to 10 October 1893 (in which she provided a shore party in January 1893 that bolstered the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy), she remained on the West Coast until laid up at Mare Island Navy Yard on 4 November 1893.[1] "


      Reference:  https://www.bing.com/search?q=the+Boston+in+the+Hawaiian+Islands+in+1892&cvid=7c94aa8130a14fbabd6bb32c1f6e9c99&aqs=edge..69i57.18057j0j9&FORM=ANAB01&PC=HCTS

      1893 - Premeditation which led to piracy(ies) on the high seas did occur and evidence has been found. The references follow: 

      Mapping of the Pacific Ocean - Strategic Maps from the VALOR OF IGNORANCE by Lt. Homer Lea:


      2) New York Times article, "Pearl Harbor Coaling Station - IMPERATIVE NECESSITY THAST THE UNITED STATES TAKE POSSESSION" dated January 8, 1893 and printed January 9, 1893 or eight (8) days before the dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani. 


       3) CHRONICLE OF AMERICA by Chronicle Publications, Mount Kisco, N.Y. article "U.S. ends coup in Hawaii" documenting that "Men from the cruiser Boston poured ashore on January 15 "to protect American lives and property," according to United States Minister John L. Stevens." This occurred two (2) days before the dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani. 


       4) The NEW YORK TIMES article, "The Story of a Crime" dated 6/21/1898 documents January 16, 1893 as the day that the troops landed "---three companies of bluejackets, one of artillery, one of marines, 154 men and 10 officers with 14,000 cartridges for rifles and the Gatling gun, 1,900 revolver cartridges, and 174 explosive shells for the revolving canon" was taken on land, a day (1) before the dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani. 

      5)  American Civil War Generals (On Assignment) in Hawaii:

          1.  General Marshall

           2.  General Armstrong/General Samuel Armstrong

           3.  General W. H. Dimond

           4.  Walter Gresham

           5.  Alfred S. Hartwell

           6.  Carl Schurz

           7.  Robert E. Lee

            8.  General Schofield


      6.  The Sharpshooters were given a U.S. Pamphlet with Instructions on What to Do, etc. by the U.S.

      See:  U.S. Military Tactics Used by the Sharpshooters, etc.

      The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, November 11, 1896, Page 6, Image 6

      Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

      Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015415/1896-11-11/ed-1/seq-6/

      Print this image Download this image

      The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, November 11, 1896, Page 6, Image 6

      Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

      Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015415/1896-11-11/ed-1/seq-6/

      Print this image Download this image

      The Hawaiian star. [volume] (Honolulu [Oahu]) 1893-1912, November 11, 1896, Page 6, Image 6

      Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

      Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015415/1896-11-11/ed-1/seq-6/

      Print this image Download this image

      7.  U.S. President William McKinley had the Army, Navy, and other personnel to develop the Territory of the United States in 1898 disregarding the facts that U.S. Grover Cleveland had given Hawaii back to Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, 1894, and 1897.

      8.  The Booz and Allen Co. gave advice to the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees in 20  .  The Company works with the NSA/National Security Administration, the CIA/Central Intelligence Agency, etc.  Their former employee Sheldon is a Whistleblower who lives in Russia for asylum to avoid prosecution by the U.S. for releasing secrets, etc.

      Background:  The Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees helped to plan the overthrow of King Kalakaua, Queen Liliuokalani in 1893.

      The Trustees also helped to plan the overthrow in 1893.  Focus:  William O. Smith, Sanford B. Dole, Charles Reed Bishop, etc.

      In 1909, William O. Smith, et. als. set up a Fraud Trust for Queen Liliuokalani.  The Queen denied signing a Trust with them and recorded it in her Will.

      The monies fraudulently obtained is sent to the U.S. for stocks and bonds.  Approximately $14 million per year is collected from rents and sent the the U.S.


      SUMMARY

      With the military assistance in aiding the Pirates, pillagers, genocide activities, racketeering, the Trustees of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates have perpetuated the crimes since 1884 or the development of the Trust which benefited the White Supremacists, moving on to the overthrow of a neutral, friendly, non violent nation, and even assuming the Queen's lands, assets since the Fraud Trust was created in 1909.

      Further assistance continued by the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees who sought the assistance of the company Booz and Allen who also works for the NSA/ National Security Administration, the CIA/Central Intelligence Agency which equates to ongoing military support for those who helped to breach he Neutrality laws documented by U.S. President Grover Cleveland in 1896.

      As found and documented in research, the U.S. did indeed breach the Neutrality Laws and continue to breach the Neutrality Laws even today.

      Prosecution of parties involved is due a three (3) year prison sentence.

      In Hawaii, many are guilty and the prisons would be overflowing with White Supremacists including the Trustees of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates, the Liliuokalani Trustees, and other Alii Trustees.

      Research ongoing.


      aloha.

      Amelia Gora, a Royal person, one of Kamehameha's descendants, heirs, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles Member 




      References:  

      PARASITES IN PARADISE: American Civil War Generals In the Hawaiian Islands Documented

      PARASITES IN PARADISE


      False Flag Operations: American Civil War Generals Operating In the Hawaiian Islands


                                                         researched by Amelia Gora (2017)
      The following American Civil War Generals were found in the Hawaiian Islands:
      1)  General Marshall
      2) General Armstrong/General Samuel Armstrong
      Reference:

      The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, January 02, 1892, Image 2

      Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

      Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1892-01-02/ed-1/s...

      Page 
      3)  General  W.H. Dimond

      Reference:

      The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, November 15, 1893, Image 5

      Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

      Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1893-11-15/ed-1/s...

      Page 
      4)  Walter Gresham
      5)  Alfred Hartwell
      6)  Carl Schurz
      7)  Robert E. Lee
      8)  General Schofield
      SUMMARY
      The above American Civil War Generals have been uncovered in the Hawaiian Islands. This is evidence of premeditation, conspiracies, piracy etc.
      Research incomplete.


      ********

      References:

      https://demclubathr.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/overthrow.pdf

    • Diary: EVIDENCE: WHY THE ENTITY STATE OF HAWAII IS NOT …

      https://www.opednews.com/Diary/EVIDENCE-WHY-THE...

      Aug 19, 2011 · - Evidence of breach of Treaty under International laws by U.S. Military-1893 read articles, pamphlets, books, the IOLANI-The Royal Hawk by Amelia Gora 1893 - Queen Liliuokalani destroyed the ...

      • Estimated Reading Time: 8 mins
    • Diary: The Royal Families In The Hawaiian Islands and the ...

      https://www.opednews.com/Diary/The-Royal-Families...

      Jan 17, 2012 · -Other Evidence - see articles, pamphlets, books, the IOLANI - The Royal Hawk news on the web by Amelia Gora Queen Liliuokalani's supporters of 40,000 also opposed Annexation.

      • Estimated Reading Time: 6 mins
    • IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: Treason on Mauna Kea, and ...

      https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2017/10/...

      Jul 1, 2015 - I, Amelia Gora, deny that the State of Hawaii is the "successor of the ... or Why Defenders and Supporters of Mauna Kea, Haleakala Cannot Be Arrested ... I, Amelia Gora, am one of the land owners of Mauna Kea, ... The Treaty of 1850 - Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America article …

    • IOLANI - the Royal Hawk: Historical Evidence: Exposing ...

      https://iolani-theroyal.blogspot.com/2019/12/...

      researched by Amelia Gora (2019) The following article shows the relationship of U.S. President Cleveland to a treasonous person in Hawaii. ... The military buildup began in August of 1898 with the first army base in Waikiki called Camp McKinley. Today there are 118 military sites throughout the Hawaiian Islands and it serves as the ...

    • Liar Alfred S. Hartwell - U.S. Military Operative ...

      https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2018/06/...

      Aug 30, 2014 · Review by Amelia Gora (2018) The following article was written after an interview with General Alfred S. Hartwell, former attorney general of the Hawaiian Kingdom, former Judge who claimed that the Crown Lands belonged to the seat of office, contrary to law.

      • Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
      • IOLANI - the Royal Hawk: 2019

        https://iolani-theroyal.blogspot.com/2019

        Jan 30, 2020 · Researched by Amelia Gora (2019) The article below is very telling because the characters at play were keys in usurping Queen Liliuokalani in 1893. The list of characters follow: * U.S. Secretary John Foster. John Foster. 32nd United States Secretary of State. In office. June 29, 1892 – February 23, 1893.

      • IOLANI - The Royal Hawk: U.S. President Trump Said that ...

        https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/10/...

        Oct 17, 2019 · Review posted by Amelia Gora (2019) The following articles were posted affecting the United States: 1) Pertaining to the Seizure of Hawaii, War with Spain, etc.: "Archives takes wraps off 1899 Senate transcript, Secret debate on U.S. seizure of Hawaii revealed" Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Vol. 58, No. 32, Saturday, February 1, 1969

      • More on the American Civil War Generals:
      • American Civil War Losers and their Effects on Society Today or Historical and Inbred Anger Influencing Southern U.S. Presidents and Hawaii Since 1863

                                                American Civil War Losers and their Effects on Society Today

                                                                                        or

                                             Historical and Inbred Anger Influencing Southern U.S. Presidents
                                                                          and Hawaii Since 1863


                                                                                          Review by Amelia Gora (2017)


        Have you noticed how the Southerner's attitude plays a role in Society today and the moves to Plunder Upon Innocents in the U.S., Hawaii, and Abroad?

        The following excerpts about the Northern and Southern perspectives from a book REFLECTIONS AND COMMENTS written by Edwin Lawrence Godkin (1877) under the Chapter:  The South After the War, brought on curiosities leading to the idea that war losers in this case the American Civil War has been influential in Southern born U.S. Presidents attitudes when interacting with "People of Color":

        Godkin wrote:  "as one Southerner expressed it to me on my mentioning the change, "Yes, sir, we have been brought into intellectual and moral relations with the rest of the civilized world." All subjects are now open at the South in conversation.

        Is this true? it will probably be asked, with regard to the late war. Can you talk freely about that? Not exactly; but then the limitations on your discourse on this point are not peculiar to the South; they are such as would be put upon the discourse of two parties to a bloody contest in any civilized country among well-bred men or women. The events of the war you can discuss freely, but you are hardly at liberty to denounce Southern soldiers or officers, or accuse them of "rebellion," or to assume that they fought for base or wicked motives. Moreover, in a certain sense, all Southerners are still "unrepentant rebels." Doubtless, in view of the result, they will acknowledge that the war was a gigantic mistake; but I found that if I sought for an admission that, if it was all to do over again, they would not fight, I was touching on a very tender point, and I was gently but firmly repelled. The reason is plain enough.

        In confessing this, they would, they think, be confessing that their sons and brothers and fathers had perished miserably in a causeless struggle on which they ought never to have entered, and this, of course, would look like a slur on their memory, and their memory is still, after the lapse of twelve years, very sacred and very dear.

        I doubt if many people at the North have an adequate notion of the intensity of the emotions with which Southerners look back on the war; and I mean tender and not revengeful or malignant emotions. The losses of the battle-field were deeply felt at the North—in many households down to the very roots of life; but on the whole they fell on a large and prosperous population, on a community which in the very thick of the fray seemed to be rolling up wealth, which revelled as it fought, and came out of the battle triumphant, exultant, and powerful.

        At the South they swept through a scanty population with the most searching destructiveness, and when all was over they had to be wept over in ruined homes and in the midst of a society which was wrecked from top to bottom, and in which all relatives and friends had sunk together to common perdition. There has been no other such cataclysm in history.

        Great states have been conquered before now, but conquest did not mean a sudden and desolating social revolution; so that to a Southerner the loss of relatives on the battle-field or in the hospital is associated with the loss of everything else.

        A gentleman told me of his going, at the close of the war, into a little church in South Carolina on Sunday, and finding it filled with women, who were all in black, and who cried during the singing. It reminded one of the scene in the cathedral at Leyden, when the people got together to chant a Te Deum on hearing that the besieging army was gone; but, the music suddenly dying out, the air was filled with the sounds of sobbing.

        The Leydeners, however, were weak and half-starved people, weeping over a great deliverance; these South Carolinians were weeping before endless bereavement and hopeless poverty. I doubt much if any community in the modern world was ever so ruthlessly brought face to face with what is sternest and hardest in human life; and those of them who have looked at it without flinching have something which any of us may envy them.

        But then I think it would be a mistake to suppose that Southerners came out of the war simply sorrowful. At the close, and for some time afterward, they undoubtedly felt fiercely and bitterly, and hated while they wept; and this was the primal difficulty of reconstruction. Frequently in conversation I heard some violent speech or act occurring soon after the war mentioned with the parenthetical explanation, "You know, I felt very bitterly at that time." But, then, I have always heard it from persons who are to day good-tempered, conciliatory, and hopeful, and desirous of cultivating good relations with Northerners; from which the inference, which so many Northern politicians find it so hard to swallow, is easy—viz., that time produces on Southerners its usual effects.

        What Mr. Boutwell and Mr. Blaine would have us believe is that Southerners are a peculiar breed of men, on whom time produces no effect whatever, and who feel about things that happened twenty years ago just as they feel about things which happened a month ago.


        The fact is, however, that they are in this respect like the rest of the human race. Time has done for their hearts and heads what it has done for the old Virginia battle-fields. There was not in 1865 a fence standing between the Potomac and Gordonsville, and but few, if any, undamaged houses. When I passed Manassas Junction the other day there was a hospitable-looking tavern and several houses at the station; the flowers were blooming in the yard, and crowds of young men and women in their Sunday clothes were gathered from the country around to see a base-ball match, and a well-tilled and well-fenced and smiling farming country stretched before my eyes in every direction. The only trace of the old fights was a rude graveyard filled, as a large sign informed us, with "the Confederate dead." All the rest of the way down to the springs the road ran through farms which looked as prosperous and peaceful as if the tide of war had not rolled over them inside a hundred years, and it is impossible to talk with the farmers ten minutes without seeing how thoroughly human and Anglo-Saxon they are.

        With them the war is history—tender, touching, and heroic history if you will, but having no sort of connection with the practical life of to-day. Some of us at the North think their minds are occupied with schemes for the assassination and spoliation of negroes, and for a "new rebellion." Their minds are really occupied with making money, and the farms show it, and their designs on the negro are confined to getting him to work for low wages. His wages are low—forty cents a day and rations, which cost ten cents—but he is content with it. I saw negroes seeking employment at this rate, and glad to get it; and in the making of the bargain nothing could be more commercial, apparently, than the relations of the parties. They were evidently laborer and employer to each other, and nothing more."

        Reference:
        http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/7257/pg7257-images.html


        Highlighted Information or the Dynamics of Southern Attitudes

        "Southerners are a peculiar breed of men, on whom time produces no effect whatever, and who feel about things that happened twenty years ago just as they feel about things which happened a month ago."

        "Some of us at the North think their minds are occupied with schemes for the assassination and spoliation of negroes, and for a "new rebellion." Their minds are really occupied with making money, and the farms show it, and their designs on the negro are confined to getting him to work for low wages."

        "They were evidently laborer and employer to each other, and nothing more."


        Add the Southern States:

        "Eleven states left the United States in the following order and formed the Confederate States of America: South CarolinaMississippiFloridaAlabamaGeorgiaLouisianaTexasVirginiaArkansasNorth Carolina, and Tennessee."


        Add the U.S. Presidents Since 1861 (Confederate States of America formed) through 2017:

        Name of President                                              State Born In

        15. James Buchanan                                              Pennsylvania
        16. Abraham Lincoln                                            Kentucky
        17. Andrew Johnson                                             North Carolina                      Confederate State
        18. Ulysses S. Grant                                              Ohio
        19. Rutherford B. Hayes                                        Ohio
        20. James Garfield                                                 Ohio
        21. Chester A. Arthur                                            Vermont
        22. Grover Cleveland                                             New Jersey
        23. Benjamin Harrison                                           Ohio
        24. Grover Cleveland                                             New Jersey
        25. William McKinley                                            Ohio                          20th Century
        26. Theodore Roosevelt                                          New York - banking influence
        27. William Howard Taft                                        Ohio
        28. Woodrow Wilson                                              Virginia                              Confederate State
        29. Warren G. Harding                                            Ohio
        30. Calvin Coolidge                                                 Vermont
        31. Herbert Hoover                                                   Iowa
        32. Franklin D. Roosevelt                                         New York - banking influence
        33. Harry S. Truman                                                 Missouri
        34. Dwight D. Eisenhower                                       Texas                                  Confederate State
        35. John F. Kennedy                                                 Massachusetts
        36. Lyndon B. Johnson                                             Texas                                  Confederate State
        37. Richard M. Nixon                                               California
        38. Gerald R. Ford                                                    Nebraska
        39. James Carter                                                       Georgia                               Confederate State
        40. Ronald Reagan                                                    Illinois              
        41. George H. W. Bush                                             Massachusetts-lived in Texas Confederate State
        42. William J. Clinton                                               Arkansas                             Confederate State
        21st Century
        43. George W. Bush                                                  Connecticut -lived in Texas  Confederate State
        44. Barack Obama                                                     Kenya or Kingdom of Hawaii
        45. Donald J. Trump                                                 New York


        References:  
        https://www.whitehouse.gov/1600/Presidents
        bing.com
        other researches by Amelia Gora


        Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/Hawaiian archipelago 

        Pirates

        Charles Reed Bishop                                  Born In:  New York - banking influence
        William Little Lee                                      Born In:  New York - banking influence

        Governors Appointed by the U.S. President

        Sanford B. Dole                                           Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
        George R. Carter                                          Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
        Walter F. Frear                                             Born In:  California
        Lucius E. Pinkham                                       Born In:  Massachusetts
        Charles J. McCarthy                                     Born In:  Massachusetts
        Wallace R. Farrington                                  Born In:  Maine
        Lawrence M. Judd                                        Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
        Joseph Poindexter                                         Born In:  Oregon
        Ingram Stainback                                          Born In:  Tennessee                  Confederate State
        Oren E. Long                                                Born In:  Kansas
        Samuel Wilder King                                     Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
        William F. Quinn                                          Born In:  New York
        Elected by the People                                  
        William F. Quinn                                          Born In:  New York
        John A. Burns                                             Born In:  Montana
        George Ariyoshi                                          Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii
        John D. Waihee III                                     Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii

        Ben Cayetano                                              Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii
        Linda Lingle                                                Born In:  Missouri
        Neil Abercrombie                                       Born In:  New York
        David Ige                                                     Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii


        Note:  U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani Twice: In 1894 and 1897
        See:  http://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2017/11/overview-of-us-president-cleveland-gave.html

        U.S. President McKinley had the Army, Navy, and Federal personnel "develop" the Territory.
        U.S. President McKinley "Proclaimed" Hawaii to be a Territory of the U.S.

        In 1912, the Territory's Attorney General documented that 'the Territory is the successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii'.

        See:  Updating the ILLEGAL U.S. Documented in Hawaii -A Review- by Amelia Gora (2016)

        SUMMARY

        Hawaii became infiltrated with People of Color haters.

        Kamehameha III passed the anti-slavery law in 1852.

        The U.S. passed their anti-slavery law in 1865 or 13 years later.

        There were only a few word changes.

        The philosophies of the Confederate States were taken on by those arriving in Hawaii.

        It was the sugar planters of Hawaii who moved over to the Mexican's territory, then had the U.S. assist in claiming lands of the Mexicans.

        The territory was renamed Texas and they were part of the Confederate States who fought the Union Army.

        The attitudes taken on in the Hawaiian Islands and the U.S.:

        "Southerners are a peculiar breed of men, on whom time produces no effect whatever, and who feel about things that happened twenty years ago just as they feel about things which happened a month ago."


        "Some of us at the North think their minds are occupied with schemes for the assassination and spoliation of negroes, and for a "new rebellion." Their minds are really occupied with making money, and the farms show it, and their designs on the negro are confined to getting him to work for low wages."

        "They were evidently laborer and employer to each other, and nothing more."
      • also posted at:  https://amelia-gora.blogspot.com/2017/12/american-civil-war-losers-and-their.html
      • Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: Important Articles Documenting Fraud, ... Amelia Gora About the United States: The following Lies are documented in the 1898 ... GENOCIDE: 1893 SHARPSHOOTERS WHO KILLED KANAKA MAOLI REVEALED.
        Feb 18, 2020 — Hawaiian Kingdom Facts/EVIDENCE: Sharpshooters Pictures Revealed by Whistleblowers ... posted by Amelia Gora (2020) ... Articles were found showing U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani ...
        The Crown Lands make up nearly a million acres of lands which belonged to Kamehameha, his descendants and heirs. Since the premeditation moves by the ...
         Rating: 5 · ‎2 reviews
        Missing: Sharpshooters ‎articles
        Dec 6, 2020 — Reviewed by Amelia Gora (2020). The following article was printed in 1969 : "Archives takes wraps off 1899 Senate transcript, Secret debate on ...
        You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 6/11/21
        Oct 27, 2009 — 2009-0317 from Amelia Gora, a Royal person and Acting Liaison of. Foreign Affairs. I, Amelia Gora, am one of the owners of the Crown Lands because I ... New York Times article, "Pearl Harbor Coaling Station - IMPERATIVE ...
        4 pages
         
        Mar 6, 2010 — from Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, Amelia Gora. REASONS WHY ... Noted by author of the NEW YORK TIMES article, "The Story of a Crime":.
         
        The latest Tweets from amelia gora (@hwnwahine). One of Kamehameha's descendants, Researcher, author, ... proof posted - the Sharpshooters in Hawaii ...
         
        Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: Important Articles Documenting Fraud, ... Amelia Gora About the United States: The following Lies are documented in the 1898 ... GENOCIDE: 1893 SHARPSHOOTERS WHO KILLED KANAKA MAOLI REVEALED
        Feb 23, 2020 — The Photos shows the Sharpshooters who killed kanaka maoli and ... by Amelia Gora (2020) Articles John Foster -Directed the overthrow of ...
         

        Neutrality Act of 1794

        From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
        Jump to navigationJump to search

        The Neutrality Act of 1794 makes it illegal for an American citizen to wage war against any country at peace with the United States. The Act declares in part:[1]

        If any person shall within the territory or jurisdiction of the United States begin or set on foot or provide or prepare the means for any military expedition or enterprise ... against the territory or dominions of any foreign prince or state of whom the United States was at peace that person would be guilty of a misdemeanor.

        The act also forbids foreign war vessels to outfit in American waters and sets a three-mile territorial limit at sea.[2]

        The act was amended several times and remains in force.[3]

        Origins and evolution[edit]

        One reason for the act was to create a liability for violation of Section 8 of Article One of the United States Constitution, which reserves to the United States Congress the power to decide to go to war.[4]

        The Continental Congress previously had an alliance with France in 1778[5] that France accused the United States of violating with the 1794 American Jay Treaty with Great Britain. The French Ambassador to the United States, Edmond-Charles Genêt, had been actively recruiting American privateers for attacks on Spain and Great Britain, with whom the French Republican Government was at war.

        Some individuals in America were supporting the French Republican Government by engaging in privateering[6] and other Americans were engaging in filibuster military operations against British Canada and Spanish possessions in Florida and South America.

        This led to George Washington's Proclamation of Neutrality in 1793 and the act of 1794.

        The Act was used in the trials of Aaron BurrWilliam S. Smith and Etienne Guinet, who, with Frenchman Jean Baptist LeMaitre, were convicted of outfitting an armed ship to take part in France's war against Great Britain.[7]

        The Act of 1794 was superseded by the Neutrality Act of 1817[8] that included States that had recently become independent from Spain that were not mentioned in the original act.[9] Unrecognised governments such as "colonies, districts, or people" are given the same recognition as "states and princes" in the last clause of section 5.[10] Henry Clay called it "an Act for the benefit of Spain against the republics of America."[10]

        The Neutrality Act of 1817 also prescribes maximum penalties of three years imprisonment and up to a three thousand dollar fine.[11]

        The Act was updated again in 1838 during the 1837 Rebellions in Canada.

        The Neutrality Act was reenacted and amended several times since, and remains in force as 18 U.S.C. § 960.[12]

        Recent applications[edit]

        In 1981, nine men involved in Operation Red Dog were sentenced to three years in prison under the Neutrality Act; they had planned to overthrow the government of Dominica.[13][14]

        In the 2007 Laotian coup d'état conspiracy allegation, the US government alleged after a sting operation that a group of conspirators planned to violate the Neutrality Act by overthrowing the government of Communist Laos.[15] The United States Government has since dropped all charges against these defendants.

        In May 2016 four US residents were convicted of violating the Neutrality Act for their role in the 2014 Gambian coup d'état attempt[16]

        References[edit]

        1. ^ Kwakwa, Edward K. (1992). The International Law of Armed Conflict: Personal and Material Fields of Application. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 116. ISBN 0-7923-1558-8.
        2. ^ Kim, Sun Pyo (2004). Maritime Delimitation and Interim Arrangements in North East Asia. Martinus Nijhoff. pp. 225ISBN 90-04-13669-X.
        3. ^ Application of the Neutrality Act to Official Government Activities
        4. ^ Boyle, Francis A. (2007). Protesting Power: War, Resistance, and Law. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. p. 78. ISBN 978-0-7425-3892-4.
        5. ^ Cunliffe, Marcus; Kenneth W. Leish (1968). The American Heritage History of the Presidency. American Heritage Pub. Co.
        6. ^ Benton, Thomas Hart (1857). Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856: Dec. 5. 1796-March 3, 1803. D. Appleton. p. 126.
        7. ^ U S v. GUINET2 U.S. 321 (U.S. Supreme Court 1795).
        8. ^ Evans, Lawrence Boyd (1922). Leading Cases on International Law. Callaghan and Co.
        9. ^ Wheaton, Henry; Richard Henry (1866). Elements of International Law. Little, Brown & Company. pp. 439.
        10. Jump up to:a b Beamis, George (1864). Precedents of American Neutrality. The University of Michigan. p. 38.
        11. ^ May, Robert E. (2002). Manifest Destiny's Underworld: Filibustering in Antebellum America. University of North Carolina Press. pp. Chapter 1. ISBN 0-8078-2703-7.
        12. ^ Jules Lobel (1983), "The Rise and Decline of the Neutrality Act: Sovereignty and Congressional War Powers in United States Foreign Policy"Harvard International Law Journal24
        13. ^ "2 Guilty in New Orleans for Plot on Dominica Invasion"The New York Times, June 21, 1981
        14. ^ "Klansmen Get 3-year Terms", Boston Globe, July 23, 1981
        15. ^ Weiner, Tim (2008-05-11). "Gen. Vang Pao's Last War"The New York Times Magazine.
        16. ^ https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/four-americans-sentenced-failed-gambian-coup-n573371
        May 24, 2012 — Acts of piracy threaten maritime security by endangering, in particular, the welfare of seafarers and the security of navigation and commerce.
        International piracy law is international law that is meant to protect against piracy. It was enacted primarily by the United Nations and UNCLOS, and defines ...
        by T Treves2009Cited by 294 — The definition of piracy is rather narrow, as it includes only action on the high seas ...
        Any nation can arrest suspected pirates on the high seas—piracy is the oldest international crime—yet international law defines only the crime, not the penalty. As ...
        by L Azubuike2009Cited by 106 — Azubuike, Lawrence (2009) "International Law Regime Against Piracy," Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law: Vol. 15: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at:​ ...
        by D GuilfoyleCited by 3 — international law sense. From 2003-2004 onward, there was a significant increase in pirate attacks off Somalia. This form of piracy focused on hijacking vessels ...
        15 pages
        Oct 7, 2020 — The volatile humanitarian crisis in Somalia allows more and more citizens to conduct acts of piracy and this makes it almost impossible to enforce ...
        by D Chang2010Cited by 29 — This Note analyzes the current international legal framework for the punishment and prosecution of maritime piracyPiracy is an international problem that ...
        Maritime Piracy is a crime under international law, although in order to meet the criteria set out by UNCLOS Article 101, the attack needs to occur on the high ...  
        The definition of the crime of genocide as contained in Article II of the Genocide Convention was the result of a negotiating process and reflects the compromise ...
        The Genocide Convention was the first human rights treaty adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 9 December 1948 and signified the ...
        7(3); Krstic, ICTY, Appellate Judgment § 140]. Genocidal intent requires that acts must be committed against members of a group specifically because they belong ...
        (a) Basic Offense.—Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, ...
        The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG), or Genocide Convention, is an international treaty that criminalizes ...
        Signed: 9 December 1948
        Parties: 152 (complete list‎)‎
        Signatories: 39
        Effective: 12 January 1951
        In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious ...
        In her first address to the UN Human Rights Council in September 2008, High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay informed the Council that she will be​ ...
        by WA SchabasCited by 35 — This article discusses genocide as a legal concept. The crime of genocide has been incorporated within the national legal systems of many countries, where ...
        Mar 11, 2021 — Genocide is among the gravest crimes against humanity, but there is debate over which historical crimes qualify.
        '' Following the mass atrocities committed before and during World War II, the international community sought to condemn genocide. The slaughtering of ...

      • No comments:

        Post a Comment