The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Reposted Testimony of 2010
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1006/ML100680514.pdf
Hearing Docket
From: Amelia Gora [hawaiiahhistory@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 3:54 AM
To: comments@whitehouse.gov; president@whitehouse.gov; Docket, Hearing;
governor.lingle@hawaii.gov; john.maguire@rfi.fr; Web Japan; peace@city.hiroshima.jp
Cc: Angela Rosa; Baratta, Anthony; Barbara Moore; Klukan, Brett; Scott, Catherine; Cory Harden;
Hawkens, Roy; Isaac D. Harp; Jim Albertini; Tucker, Katie; Kent Herring, LTC, JA; Sexton,
Kimberly;. Luwella K. Leonardi; Kennedy, Michael; OCAAMAIL Resource; OGCMailCenter
Resource; Julian, Emile
Subject: Re: LB Memorandum and Order (Denying Requests for Hearing) (LBP-10-04) US Army
Installation Command
REVISIONS APPLIED DUE TO CONFUSING LANGUAGE
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Amelia Gora wrote:
Revised LEGAL NOTICE U SN. r
USNRC
March 6, 2010 CS: 5ry 1)
OFFICE OF SECRETARY
RULEMAKINGS AND
ADJUDICATIONS STAFF
U.S. President Barack Obama, Linda Lingle, Attorney General, Daniel Inouye
NRA/Nuclear Regulatory Agency; U.S. Army, military in our Hawaiian Islands
Kingdom of Hawaii Records No. 2010-0006 EVICTION NOTICE REMINDER, REMINDER of Rents, Leases Due
for land use of $500 Trillion dollars per year in gold coins retroactive to 1893 and ending through EVICTION
December 2010;
the entity State of Hawaii, City and County of Honolulu, Inouye, et. als. are not related to our families, and perpetuate
the frauds of those who conspired against our families, our people, and wrongfully/criminally assumed a neutral, nonviolent, friendly nation; Oppositions to all the above discovered criminal activities are hereby documented, and all
wrongdoing must cease, and are hereby nulled and void on this day, March 5, 2010
from Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, Amelia Gora
REASONS WHY OUR HAWAIIAN MONARCHY
GOVERNMENT EXISTS
Review by Amelia Gora, a Royal person (2010)
There are problematic issues caused by the U.S. belligerent occupation in the Hawaiian Islands in the world today, which leads
to ongoing issues affecting 191 nations in the world today.
A friendly, neutral nation headed by our Queen recognized as part of the Pacific Empire with Aetearoa, and the Samoan
Islands, and locked into permanent treaties, conventions, agreements with other nations, by the Law of Nations was criminally
usurped by a belligerent, hostile, bankrupt nation called the U.S. (supported by England and the bankers) whose military
acted on behalf of the U.S. President Benjamin Harrison, Congress, et.als.orders.
1b
. They. criminally moved to assume the private properties of our Royal families, assumed the assets, lands, resources, identities
with the help of pirates, racketeers, bankers, sugar planters, American businessmen, treasonous persons working in the
Hawaiian government positions, etc.
In a concerted effort by 2,000+ Americans and supporters who were paid $50-$500 each, hundreds of Masons/Freemasons
who arrived to celebrate a building two weeks prior and calling Honolulu their "home city", the following is part of a trail of
evidence discovered in research,
*Masons/Freemasons were set in place to break down Monarchy governments worldwide.
1893 Constitution
Queen Liliuokalani destroyed the Constitution changing
the government or the Constitutional government back to a Monarchy.
This negated the Bayonet Constitution and her own Constitution that she wanted to update.
Queen Liliuokalani utilized her Sovereign right, her Royal decree, similar to the executive order used by the U.S. Presidents.
The difference being that a Royal person can legally do as they wish, and are not subject to the laws. The U.S. Presidents use of
an executive order is by "tradition" started by George Washington, and is NOT law or legal. A tradition is not law.
(Note to Americans: This is one of the flaws, areas where the PEOPLE can make changes in government when the PEOPLE
move to take back their government.)
Genealogy Based Leadership
Because Monarchy governments are based on genealogies, these are the reasons why our Queen could apply her Royal
authority(ies):
(1) her mother Keohokalole (female),was a hanai/adopted daughter of a Kamehameha descendant.
This is How:
Kamehameha (male) - he started the Monarchy government in 1810.
/
Kaoleioku (male) /
Hanuna (male) /
Kapule (male) married Kini (female) (pio/close marriage) /
Nahuina (female)
/
hanai: Keohokalole (female) /
Kaeha/Kamakaeha/Namakaeha/Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani
2) Queen Liliuokalani attended the Royal School - with the intent that
specific children would be leaders, etc.
3) Queen Liliuokalani was a hanai/adopted child of a Kamehameha
descendant. This is how:
Kamehameha (male)>' he started the Monarchy government in 1810.
/
Kaoleioku (male) /
Konia (female) married Abner Paki (male)
2
hanai: Kaeha/Kamakaeha/Namakaeha/Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani
History Reviewed
Queen Liliuokalani utilized her Sovereign status to change the laws at her leisure. The premeditation by the U.S. government,
military, and American businessmen to dethrone her to some degree was foiled.
Our Queen Liliuokalani basically locked up the Hawaiian Kingdom as a
Monarchy government, purposefully with the intent to maintain Sovereign
rights for our people as well which also limited the rights of the foreigners (including those who conspired, did treasonous acts
against her, her subjects, others loyal to the Hawaiian Kingdom).
Amidst the drastic changes, the standing orders of the U.S. Congress, government to dethrone her, and the U.S. military's
aggressive moVe against a neutral, non-violent, friendly nation, the following are the event that occurred:
1893 - January 9. U.S. Congress gave orders to assume Pearl Harbor and "to not mention the troops" in the NEW YORK
TIMES newspaper article. (Injthe past, messages were passed through the news media.)
1893 - January 15. American Minister Stevens and men left the steamship -of-war BOSTON "to protect American lives and
property," with their "three companies of bluejackets, one of artillery, one of marines, 154 mean and 10 officers; with 14,000
cartridges for rifles'and the Gatling gun, 1,300 revolver cartridges, and 174 explosive shells for the revolving cannon.
These forces were landed, on foreign soil, not at the request of the lawful Government - the Governor of Oahu promptly sent a
formal note of protest to Minister Stevens - representing 88,000 of the population, but at the request of a committee of rebels
representing 2,000 American residents."
"One company was left at the legation where the "American life and property" were to be found, while the rest of the force
was marched to
Arlon Hall, a structure close to the palace and just across the street from the Government Building, where, of course, the
rebels would necessarily make their attack."
1893. January 16. The Rear Admiral reported that "Arlon Hall was ill=chosen for the professed purpose for which the troops
were landed. "Naturally," he adds, "if they were landed with a view to supporting the Provisional Government troops than
occupying the Government Building, it was a wise choice."
1893 - January 17. The American "conspirators signed their proclamation announcing that the Hawaiian monarchy had been
"abrogated" and a Provisional Government established, with Sanford B. Dole as Chairman of the Executive Council."
"They took this to the Government Building and there read it,, within seenty-five yards of the point where the United States
forces were stationed with their Gatling gun and small cannon."
"With only the Government Building in their hands, the Queen being at the palace and her troops in possession of the police
station, and but for the overawing force of United States troops in possession also of the city, the rebels posted off to the
American Legation with a request for recognition. They got it with extraordinary promptness. The Provisional Government
was proclaimed between 2 and 3 o'clock. Two hours later the new Government had received the following document, which, to
our shame, will live in history:
United States Legation.
Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands, Jan. 17, 1893.
A Provisional Government having been duly constituted in place of the recent Government of Queen Liliuokalani, and said
Provisional Government being in full possession of the Government buildings, the archives, and the Treasury, and in control
of the capital of the Hawaiian Islands. I hereby recognize said Provisional Government as the de facto Government of the
Hawaiian Islands.
JOHN L. STEVENS
Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States.
Noted by author of the NEW YORK TIMES article, "The Story of a Crime":
3
"The Dole conspirators were not "in full possession of the Government buildings." but of only one of them, which was
occupied only by clerks and porters at the time of their raid .............. it was still too early to apply the word "recent" to the
Government of the Queen, for the rebels did not wait on the Queen with their treasonable proclamation until after Minister
Stevens had recognized their Government."
"The Queen yielded, of course,. She could do nothing else against a rebellion that was so manifestly backed up by the superior
armed forces and by the Minister of the United States. She signed, under protest, a paper renouncing her rights."
Queen Liliuokalani in 1895 was forced to sign an abdication by conspirators, treasonous persons, pirates, Sanford B. Dole, et.
als.
Summary
Queen Liliuokalani returned the government to a Monarchy government when she destroyed the Constitution affecting King
Kalakaua's Bayonet Constitution which was signed at gun point, and a Constitution that she had put together which did not
appeal to the Americans in the Hawaiian Islands.
Queen Liliuokalani utilized her Sovereign authority based on the following:
1. Hanai/adopted relationship to the Kamehameha line, a leader who formed the monarchy government.
2. Attending the Royal School - a School for Hawaiian leaders - based on genealogies for a monarchy government.
3. Hanai/adopted daughter of a Kamehameha descendant, part of a monarchy government.
and another reason taken as an excerpt from above:
The American "conspirators signed their proclamation announcing that the Hawaiian monarchy had been "abrogated" and a
Provisional Government established, with Sanford B. Dole as Chairman of the Executive Council."
4. The American's at the time of the wrongful dethronement did proclaim and announce that the Hawaiian monarchy was
''abrogated".
In other words, the recognition of a monarchy form of government, not a Constitutional monarchy
aloha.
references:
NEW YORK TIMES articles (1) The Story of a Crime; and (2) Pearl Harbor Coaling Station - Imperative Necessity that the
United States Take Possession; AFFAIRS IN ASIA, 1st Qtr 1897 - The Republic of Hawaii, an aged article purchased off the
internet which came from GREECE! THE LIBERAL newspaper, January 28, 1893, genealogy, history researches, etc.
A CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY "IN REM" CLAIMS SOME:
The following was posted by Tane on Maoliworld.com This is his take:
It's simpler to refer to the Constitution of 1864 which is still basically in effect. The reason being that the 1887 was
never ratified but implied; Legislation was out of session at the time; the Queen attempted to restore it; it was still a
Constitutional Monarchy whereas the Bayonet Constitution of 1887 was done under duress which makes it null and
void; 1887 stripped her powers which means her veto power was nil.
She proposed the new constitution to restore the rights of the citizens and redeem the powers of the monarch enjoyed
by Lot. Her muhe'e cabinet had double-crossed her once she intended to promugate the illicit constitution and told
her to hold off. When the people gathered, she told them to be patient as she could not promulgate the Bayonet
constitution and introduce the new one which she felt had to have the approval and support of her cabinet to go
through the proper protocols as was done in 1864.
4
As far as the Kawananakoas, they are collateral relations to Queen Kapiolani who was not head of state. Queen
Regnant Lili'uokalani had the Crown Princess Kaiulani confirmed by the legislature as as successor dictated by the
constitutions. Under the Constitutions, the criteria was established on succession and eligibility of successors. Today
there would be an election as the two previous Kings were elected to the throne.
There is a catch-22 we are faced with today. The marriages had to be approved by the Monarch; if not, the eligible
would be cut from the line of succession as if he/she were dead. One could not be an idiot; and it was important for the
candidate to be above reproach and groomed as well as educated through the proper process of schooling befit for a
monarch.
Kauikeaouli had set up the pool of eligibles. None had direct descendants except for Abigail Maheha whose
decendants are still living. Nonetheless, the pool would then be open to ALL colaterals of high birth; Hawaiian system
relied on who is the mother and who is the father which determined the rank of the offspring.
On top of that, illegitimate/bastard children under the Christian guidelines that influenced the "legitimacy" of
successors as written in the constitutions, would be cut from the line as if dead and become ineligible.
So, do we set a precedent?
To answer your initial question, we can refer to the treaties ratified by over 20-25 countries including the U.S.A. which
establishes within their Constitution that ratified treaties are the Supreme law of the land. The U.S. have admitted to their
complicity by invading and conspiring to unlawfully takeover the Kingdom of Hawai'i.
Under International law, such admittance deems the invasion, a belligerent occupation with a civilian arm to govern. The U.S.
continues to violate the laws of occupation and the laws of neutrality. International law experts have declared that the
Kingdom still exists.
The Queen's formal protest, the memorial along with the Ku'e Petitions of 1897 led to the treaty of annexation to be rejected
by the U.S. Congress. Within the Turpie Resolution of 1894, it allowed the people to determine and maintain their own
governance and political policy, hence the petitions that wasgiven to U.S. Congress in 1897.
The U.S. joint resolution, considered not binding but a declaration, is null and void in a foreign country since it is outside of
their jurisdiction and any other subsequent action within that foreign country has no standing according to international law
and the laws within the U.S.A.'s constitution.
While the U.S. government considered Hawaii as4a:U.S. territory, the world including U.S. Americans recognized us as a
foreign country and under NGO status. I knew I was a Hawaii national/citizen since I was about 8 years old.
The Constitutional Monarchy of the Kingdom of Hawai'i still exists but in rem.
Third Point ............
There are problematic cases affecting our Royal families:
* Estate of Kekauluohi (1876) - Flaws in genealogy(ies)/heirs, etc.
Reference: Volume 6 Hawaii Reports
* Thurston vs. Bishop (1888) Opinions of the Court on land, konohiki laws, etc.
Reference: Volume 7 Hawaii Reports
* Bishop vs. Gulick (1889) Bishop Estates trustees become heirs.
Reference: Volume 7 Hawaii Reports
* Estate of Brenig (1889) Samuel Maikai claimed heir and Estate of Bernice Pauahi
Bishop case used as precedence.
Ref: Volume 7 Hawaii Reports
5
* Hawaiian Government vs. Cartwright (1890) Government lien on private lands of Kamehameha IV, etc.
Reference: Volume 8 Hawaii Reports
* In Re Sheldon (1893) Discussion of changeover from provisional government to Republic because provisional governments
last only 2 years
Reference: Volume 9 Hawaii Reports
* Rooke v. Queen's Hospital (1899) Note: TCB Rooke's heir C Rooke, a nephew and his heirs forever
Reference: Volume 12 Hawaii Reports
* In the Matter of....Pa Pelekane (1912) Note: Territory as successor the Hawaiian Kingdom
Reference: Volume 21 Hawaii Reports
*also see the Corporation Documents for the Queen's Hospital which documents Kamehameha IV as the perpetual trustee
allowing free health care to our kanaka maoli, sailors, and others. Note: This is the reason(s).why a change was made
eliminating sailors and others - issued a null and void order previously as a descendant of Peke Davis, whose mother was
Grace Kamaikui and both were the hanai/adopted children of Kauikeaouli/Kamehameha 111.
Reference: Archives, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii
*also note that the Bonds of the Hawaiian Kingdom is criminally utilized currently by the entity State of Hawaii to pay for the
Judges salaries, homes for many including foreigners discovered by some of the Sovereignty groups.
Additionally, kanaka maoli/aboriginal Hawaiians/Hawaiian nationals prisoners are released from prisons/jail if they sign an
interest over to the entity State of Hawaii in exchange for their release.
Reference: Credible sources.
Fourth Point ..........
Is it true that the Hawaiian Kingdom government lies in the Royal Order of Kamehameha?
I leave you with these questions:
Why did the military approach the Royal Order of Kamehameha for approval to use depleted uranium/DU? ......... . .. .. . and did
you know they accommodated and approved?
Why did Daniel Inouye/Senator Daniel Inouye, one armed bandit, invite all of the Royal Societies....the Royal Order of
Kamehameha, the Kaahumanu Society, the Sons and Daughter of Hawaii (a Missionary society), etc. to a meeting and asked
for their approval in claiming all of downtown Honolulu, Nuuanu, etc. as a Memorial? ..... and did you know they
accommodated and approved?
Well, this article documents oppositions to the U.S. Military, Daniel Inouye/Senator Daniel Inouye moves to gain approval
from the Royal Societies without the approval of the descendants and heirs of the lands.
Lastly, the entity State of Hawaii, City and County of Honolulu, Inouye, et. als. are not related to our families, and perpetuate
the frauds of those who conspired against our families, our people, and wrongfully/criminally assumed a neutral, non-violent,
friendly nation.
Eviction notices have been served to the U.S. military via U.S. President Obama, entity State of Hawaii Governor Lingle,
Attorney General, NRA/Nuclear Regulatory Agency, Jim Albertini, Isaac Harp, Luwella Leonardi, and to all whom it may
concern.
Oppositions to all the above discovered criminal activities are hereby documented. All wrongdoing must cease.
Fraud/deceit/criminal malfeasance, criminal moves/claims promoted and perpetuated by the U.S., Congress, military, entity
6
State of Hawaii, City and Counties (Honolulu, Maui, Molokai, Hawaii, Kauai, Niihau, etc.) current claims are without
jurisdiction/ legal jurisdiction. Continued claims by pirates, occupiers, belligerent occupiers are without jurisdiction/legal
jurisdiction, including further claims made by conspirators, treasonous persons since 1893 are null and void on this day,
March 5, 2010.
Sincerely,
Amelia Gora, a Royal person, Acting Liaison of
Foreign Affairs, Royal families House of Nobles,
Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/ Hawaiian
Islands/Hawaiian archipelago/He Mokupuni Pae
Aina o Hawaii, a living human being
Revised LEGAL NOTICE
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Docket, Hearing wrote:
Attached is a Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Denying Requests for Hearing) (LBP-10-04), US Army
Installation Command (Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Hawaii, and Pohakuloa Training Area, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii),
Docket No. 40-9083, served February 24, 2010.
Nancy Greathead
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff
Office of the Secretary
***************
